👤 Leonid D. Popov

DNA structure has many potential places where endogenous compounds and xenobiotics can bind. Therefore, xenobiotics bind along the sites of the nucleic acid with the aim of changing its structure, its genetic message, and, implicitly, its functions. Currently, there are several mechanisms known to be involved in DNA binding. These mechanisms are covalent and non-covalent interactions. The covalent interaction or metal base coordination is an irreversible binding and it is represented by an intra-/interstrand cross-link. The non-covalent interaction is generally a reversible binding and it is represented by intercalation between DNA base pairs, insertion, major and/or minor groove binding, and electrostatic interactions with the sugar phosphate DNA backbone. In the present review, we focus on the types of DNA–metal complex interactions (including some representative examples) and on presenting the methods currently used to study them. Show less

Based on bis-hetarylhydrazone H2L, a condensation product of 2,6-diacetylpyridine with 2-hydrazinobenzoxazole, a series of mononuclear copper(II) coordination compounds have been synthesized: [Cu(HL)NO3], [Cu(HL)(H2O)]ClO4, [Cu(HL)X] (X = Br−, X = Cl−). The structure of the compounds has been studied by means of NMR, IR, ESR, X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray single crystal diffraction methods. In the compounds the copper center is in the square pyramidal environment. All compounds have been screened in vitro for their cytotoxic activity against HepG2 and MRC-5 cell lines. The ligand H2L shows no cytotoxicity at tested concentrations (1–100 μM), while all the Cu(II) complexes exhibit significant dose-dependent cytotoxic effects with IC50 values in the range of 1.4–3.0 μM (HepG2 cells). Show less

Lipid droplet (LD) accumulation is a now well-recognised hallmark of cancer. However, the significance of LD accumulation in colorectal cancer (CRC) biology is incompletely understood under chemotherapeutic conditions. Since drug resistance is a major obstacle to treatment success, we sought to determine the contribution of LD accumulation to chemotherapy resistance in CRC. Here we show that LD content of CRC cells positively correlates with the expression of lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 2 (LPCAT2), an LD-localised enzyme supporting phosphatidylcholine synthesis. We also demonstrate that LD accumulation drives cell-death resistance to 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin treatments both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, LD accumulation impairs caspase cascade activation and ER stress responses. Notably, droplet accumulation is associated with a reduction in immunogenic cell death and CD8 + T cell infiltration in mouse tumour grafts and metastatic tumours of CRC patients. Collectively our findings highlight LPCAT2-mediated LD accumulation as a druggable mechanism to restore CRC cell sensitivity. Show less