📚 BiometalDB

The β-diketone scaffold is a commonly used synthetic intermediate, and is a functional group found in natural products such as curcuminoids. This core structure can also act as a chelating ligand for a variety of metals. In order to assess the potential of this scaffold for medicinal inorganic chemistry, seven different κ²-O,O'-chelating ligands were used to construct Ru(II) complexes with polypyridyl co-ligands, and their biological activity was evaluated. The complexes demonstrated promising structure-dependent cytotoxicity. Three complexes maintained high activity in a tumor spheroid model, and all complexes demonstrated low in vivo toxicity in a zebrafish model. From this series, the best compound exhibited a ~ 30-fold window between cytotoxicity in a 3-D tumor spheroid model and potential in vivo toxicity. These results suggest that κ²-O,O'-ligands can be incorporated into Ru(II)-polypyridyl complexes to create favorable candidates for future drug development. Show less

The rapid efflux of Pt-based chemotherapeutics by cancer cells is one of the major causes of drug resistance in clinically available drugs. Therefore, both the high cellular uptake as well as adequate retention efficiency of an anticancer agent are important factors to overcome drug resistance. Unfortunately, rapid and efficient quantification of metallic drug concentration in individual cancer cells still remains a tricky problem. Herein, with the help of newly developed single cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS), we have found that the well-known Ru(II)-based complex, Ru3, displayed remarkable intracellular uptake and retention efficiency in every single cancer cell with high photocatalytic therapeutic activity to overcome cisplatin resistance. Moreover, Ru3 has shown sensational photocatalytic anticancer properties with excellent in-vitro and in-vivo biocompatibility under light exposure. Show less

A series of arene Ru(II) complexes coordinated with phenanthroimidazole derivatives, [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(l)Cl]Cl(1b L = p-ClPIP = 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)imidazole[4,5f] 1,10-phenanthroline; 2b L = m-ClPIP = 2-(3-Chlorophenyl)imidazole[4,5f] 1,10-phenanthroline; 3b L = p-NPIP = 2-(4-Nitrophenyl)imidazole[4,5f] 1,10-phenanthroline; 4b L = m-NPIP = 2-(3-Nitrophenyl) imidazole [4,5f] 1,10-phenanthroline) were synthesized in yields of 89.9%-92.7% under conditions of microwave irradiation heating for 30 min to liberate four arene Ru(II) complexes (1b, 2b, 3b, 4b). The anti-tumor activity of 1b against various tumor cells was evaluated by MTT assay. The results indicated that this complex blocked the growth of human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells with an IC₅₀ of 16.59 μM. Flow cytometric analysis showed that apoptosis of A549 cells was observed following treatment with 1b. Furthermore, the in vitro DNA-binding behaviors that were confirmed by spectroscopy indicated that 1b could selectively bind and stabilize bcl-2 G-quadruplex DNA to induce apoptosis of A549 cells. Therefore, the synthesized 1b has impressive bcl-2 G-quadruplex DNA-binding and stabilizing activities with potential applications in cancer chemotherapy. Show less

The four novel Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes of [Ru(Hdpa)2dmbip](2+) (1), [Ru(Hdpa)2NO2-dmbip](2+) (2), [Ru(Hdpa)2debip](2+) (3) and [Ru(Hdpa)2OH-debip](2+) (4) where Hdpa = 2,2'-bipyridylamine, dmbip = 2-(4-N,N-dimethylbenzenamine)1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline, debip = 2-(4-N,N-diethylbenzenamine)1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline, NO2-dmbip = NO2-2-(4-N,N-dimethylbenzenamine)1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline, OH-debip = OH-2-(4-N,N-diethylbenzenamine)1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline were synthesized and fully characterized using elemental analysis, Mass, NMR and FT-IR. The DNA binding behavior of all synthesized complexes were investigated by using electronic absorption spectra, emission spectra, cyclic light switch on and off, sensor studies, electrochemical method and viscosity titrations. Docking studies were performed with human DNA TOP1 by using LibDock. Furthermore explore antimicrobial activity, photocleavage and in vitro cytotoxicity assay of four Ru(II) complexes. Show less

Title: Selective and Efficient Photoinactivation of Intracellular Abstract: Novel antibacterial agents capable of efficiently sterilizing intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) but with low cytotoxicity and low resistance development are quite appealing. In this work, three Ru(II) complexes with photolabile ligands were explored to realize such a goal. Complex 3 (5 μM) can inhibit more than 90% growth of S. aureus/MRSA that has invaded in J774A.1 cells upon visible light irradiation, being much more efficient than vancomycin. In similar conditions, negligible dark- and phototoxicity were found toward the host cells. The bactericidal activity is highly correlated with DNA covalent binding by the Ru(II) fractions generated after ligand photodissociation. Moreover, S. aureus quickly developed resistance toward vancomycin, while negligible resistance toward complex 3 even after 700 generations was obtained. These appealing results may pave a new way for fighting against intracellular antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Show less

Subtle ligand modifications on Ru^II -polypyridyl complexes may result in different excited-state characteristics, which provides the opportunity to tune their photo-physicochemical properties and subsequently change their biological functions. Here, a DNA-targeting Ru^II -polypyridyl complex (named Ru1) with highly photosensitizing ³ IL (intraligand) excited state was designed based on a classical DNA-intercalator [Ru(bpy)₂ (dppz)]⋅2 PF₆ by incorporation of the dppz (dipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine) ligand tethered with a pyrenyl group, which has four orders of magnitude higher potency than the model complex [Ru(bpy)₂ (dppz)]⋅2 PF₆ upon light irradiation. This study provides a facile strategy for the design of organelle-targeting Ru^II -polypyridyl complexes with dramatically improved photobiological activity. Show less

Halogenido and carboxylato Ru(II) half-sandwich complexes of the general composition [Ru(η⁶-p-cym)(dpa)X]PF₆ (1-5) were prepared and thoroughly characterized with various techniques (e.g., mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy and X-ray analysis); dpa = 2,2'-dipyridylamine; p-cym = p-cymene; X = Cl^- (for 1), Br^- (for 2), I^- (for 3), valproate(1-) (for 4) or 4-phenylbutyrate(1-) (for 5). A single-crystal X-ray analysis showed a pseudo-octahedral piano-stool geometry of [Ru(η⁶-p-cym)(dpa)I]PF₆ (3), with a η⁶-coordinated p-cymene, bidentate N-donor dpa ligand and iodido ligand coordinated to the Ru(II) atom. The results of the ¹H-NMR solution behaviour studies proved that the complexes 1-5 hydrolyse were in the mixture of solvents used (10% MeOD-d₄/90% D₂O). Complexes 1-5 were in vitro inactive against the A2780 human ovarian carcinoma cell line, up to the highest tested concentration (IC₅₀ > 100 μM). Show less

We have synthesized a series of novel substituted sulfonyl ethylenediamine (en) Ru^II arene complexes 1-8 of [(η⁶-arene)Ru(R¹-SO₂-EnBz)X], where the arene is benzene, HO(CH₂)₂O-phenyl or biphenyl (biph), X = Cl or I, and R¹ is phenyl, 4-Me-phenyl, 4-NO₂-phenyl or dansyl. The 'piano-stool' structure of complex 3, [(η⁶-biph)Ru(4-Me-phenyl-SO₂-EnBz)I], was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. The values of their aqua adducts were determined to be high (9.1 to 9.7). Complexes 1-8 have antiproliferative activity against human A2780 ovarian, and A549 lung cancer cells with IC₅₀ values ranging from 4.1 to >50 μM, although, remarkably, complex 7 [(η⁶-biph)Ru(phenyl-SO₂-EnBz)Cl] was inactive towards A2780 cells, but as potent as the clinical drug cisplatin towards A549 cells. All these complexes also showed catalytic activity in transfer hydrogenation (TH) of NAD⁺ to NADH with sodium formate as hydride donor, with TOFs in the range of 2.5-9.7 h^-1. The complexes reacted rapidly with the thiols glutathione (GSH) and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), forming dinuclear bridged complexes [(η⁶-biph)₂Ru₂(GS)₃]^2- or [(η⁶-biph)₂Ru₂(NAC-H)₃]^2-, with the liberation of the diamine ligand which was detected by LC-MS. In addition, the switching on of fluorescence for complex 8 in aqueous solution confirmed release of the chelated DsEnBz ligand in reactions with these thiols. Reactions with GSH hampered the catalytic TH of NAD⁺ to NADH due to the decomposition of the complexes. Co-administration to cells of complex 2 [(η⁶-biph)Ru(4-Me-phenyl-SO₂-EnBz)Cl] with L-buthionine sulfoximine (L-BSO), an inhibitor of GSH synthesis, partially restored the anticancer activity towards A2780 ovarian cancer cells. Complex 2 caused a concentration-dependent G1 phase cell cycle arrest, and induced a significant level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in A2780 human ovarian cancer cells. The amount of induced ROS decreased with increase in GSH concentration, perhaps due to the formation of the dinuclear Ru-SG complex. Show less

Three new bis(2,2'-bipyridine)-heteroleptic Ru(II) dyads incorporating thienyl groups (n = 1-3, compounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively) appended to 1,10-phenanthroline were synthesized and characterized to investigate the impact of n on the photophysical and photobiological properties within the series. All three complexes showed unstructured emission near 618 nm from a triplet metal-to-ligand charge transfer (³ MLCT) state with a lifetime (τ_em ) of approximately 1 μs. Transient absorption measurements revealed an additional excited state that was nonemissive and long-lived (τ_TA  = 43 μs for 2 and 27 μs for 3), assigned as a triplet intraligand (³ IL) state that was accessible only in 2 and 3. All three complexes were strong singlet oxygen (¹ O₂ ) sensitizers, with quantum yields (Φ_∆ ) for 2 and 3 being the largest (74-78%), and all three were photocytotoxic to cancer cells with visible light activation in the order: 3 > 2 > 1. Cell-free DNA photodamage followed the same trend, where potency increased with decreasing ³ IL energy. Compounds 2 and 3 also showed in vitro photobiological effects with red light (625 nm), where their molar absorptivities were <100 m^-1  cm^-1 . These findings highlight that Ru(II) dyads derived from α-oligothiophenes directly appended to 1,10-phenanthroline-namely 2 and 3-possess low-lying ³ IL states that are highly photosensitizing, and they may therefore be of interest for photobiological applications such as photodynamic therapy (PDT). Show less

A series of ruthenium(II)-arene complexes of several bipyridine and phenanthroline derivatives have been synthesized by employing a green and efficient protocol involving water as a solvent under sonication. The structures of all the complexes were elucidated by the spectroscopic analysis. The geometry of the chlorido and PTA (1,3,5-Triaza-7-phosphaadamantane) complexes were further confirmed by DFT and single crystal XRD. The stability study in various solvents, specifically in the intracellular one was conducted. Most of the compounds exhibited significant potency and selectivity against MCF7 and HeLa cell lines with respect to normal HEK-293 cells compared to cisplatin and RAPTA-C (Ruthenium(II)-arene PTA complex). Complex [(η6-hexamethylbenzene)RuCl(κ2-N,N-4,4'-di-n-nonyl-2,2'-bpy)]Cl (3e) presented best anticancer profiles against all the human cancer cells. Interestingly, few complexes turned up to be highly fluorescent depicted by the quantum yield values. Remarkably, [(η6-p-cymene)RuCl(κ2-N,N-bpy)]Cl (3i) was identified as most significant anticancer theranostic agent interms of potency, selectivity and fluorescence quantum yield. This complex also represented itself as significant cellular imaging agent in live U-87 MG cells which was monitored by confocal microscope. Absorption and emission spectral studies of bypyridine and phenanthroline complex series revealed that the complexes interacted with calf thymus DNA through groove binding as well as intercalative mode. In addition to this, strong binding efficacy of these scaffolds wih BSA (Bovin Serum Albumin) also enhanced their transportation property inside the cells. Show less

Aims

Ruthenium-based compounds exhibit critical biochemical properties making them suitable for diverse pharmacological applications. The aim of this work was to study the anticancer effects of three ruthenium complexes on a human gastric cancer cell line.

Main methods

We synthetized three [Ru(η⁶-anethole)(en)X]PF₆ complexes, where (en) is ethylenediamine and X is Cl (1), Br (2) or I (3), which were then evaluated by MTT assay, RT-qPCR and flow cytometry on the human gastric cancer cell line AGS.

Key findings

Compound 3 exhibited the highest cytotoxicity (IC₅₀ = 11.27 ± 1.08 μM) of the series, with an activity almost three-fold more potent than the commercial drug cisplatin, and also revealed a 4.5-fold less potent cytotoxicity in the human normal gastric cell line GES-1. The exchange of the halogen (Cl, Br or I) on the organometallic compound slightly alters its solubility in PBS and lipophilicity (expressed as Log P). Studies of gene expression revealed that compound 3 induces a significant overexpression of the pro-apoptotic genes Caspase-3, PUMA and DIABLO in the gastric cancer cell line AGS after 6 h. In contrast, only PUMA was significantly overexpressed in the normal gastric cell line GES-1. Compound 3 induced the activation of multiple caspases in AGS cells: a sign of apoptosis. Characterization via single-crystal X-ray diffraction for compound 3 confirmed the key structural features for this type of organometallic complexes.

Significance

Our data suggests that compound 3 may be an interesting anticancer molecule for the treatment of gastric cancer. Show less

Using photodynamic therapy (PDT) to trigger nonconventional cell death pathways has provided a new scheme for highly efficient and non-side effects to drug-resistant cancer therapies. Nonetheless, the unclear targets of available photosensitizers leave the manner of PDT-induced tumor cell death relatively unpredictable. Herein, we developed a novel Ru(II)-based photosensitizer, Ru-Poma. Possessing the E3 ubiquitin ligase CRBN-targeting moiety and high singlet oxygen yield of 0.96, Ru-Poma was demonstrated to specifically photodegrade endogenous CRBN, increase lipid peroxide, downregulate GPX4 and GAPDH expression, and consequently induce ferroptosis in cisplatin-resistant cancerous cells. Furthermore, with the deep penetration of two-photon excitation, Ru-Poma achieved drug-resistant circumvention in a 3D tumor cell model. Thus, we describe the first sample of the CRBN-targeting Ru(II) complex active in PDT. Show less

Herein, we describe and investigate biological activity of three octahedral ruthenium(II) complexes of the type [Ru(C^∧N)(phen)₂]⁺, RuL1-RuL3, containing a π-expansive cyclometalating substituted benzo[g]quinoxaline ligand (C^∧N ligand) (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline). Compounds RuL1-RuL3 in cervical, melanoma, and colon human cancer cells exhibit high phototoxicity after irradiation with light (particularly blue), with the phototoxicity index reaching 100 for the complex RuL2 in most sensitive HCT116 cells. RuL2 accumulates in the cellular membranes. If irradiated, it induces lipid peroxidation, likely connected with photoinduced ROS generation. Oxidative damage to the fatty acids leads to the attenuation of the membranes, the activation of caspase 3, and the triggering of the apoptotic pathway, thus implementing membrane-localized photodynamic therapy. RuL2 is the first photoactive ruthenium-based complex capable of killing the hardly treatable colon cancer stem cells, a highly resilient subpopulation within a heterogeneous tumor mass, responsible for tumor recurrence and the metastatic progression of cancer. Show less

We report on the synthesis of novel water-soluble [(arene)Ru(II)(Q)Cl] and [(arene)Ru(II)(Q)(X)]BF4 compounds (arene = p-cymene, benzene, hexamethylbenzene; HQ = 1,3-dimethyl-4-R-(C═O)-5-pyrazolone, HQ(Me), R = methyl, HQ(Ph), R = phenyl, HQ(Naph), R = naphthyl; X = H2O, 9-ethylguanine), and their in vitro antitumor activity toward the cell lines MCF7 (HTB-22, human breast adenocarcinoma), HCT116 (CCL-247, human colorectal carcinoma), A2780 (human ovarian carcinoma), A549 (CCL-185, human lung carcinoma), and U87 MG (HTB-1, human glioblastoma). The X-ray crystal structures of two complexes were determined. One of them, {chlorido-(p-cymene)-[(1,3-dimethyl-4-(1-naphthoyl)-pyrazolon-5-ato]ruthenium(II)}, was also studied with density functional theory methods and was selected for docking on a DNA octamer showing intercalation between DNA bases by the naphthyl moiety and for Ru-N7(guanine) bonding. Show less

We have synthesized and evaluated the biological properties of a compound of the type [η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(EtATSC)Cl]Cl (1) where EtATSC = 2-anthracen-9-ylmethylene-N-ethylhydrazinecarbothioamide, a thiosemicarbazone. The complex has been characterized by elemental analysis, spectroscopically (NMR, UV-Vis, and IR) and structurally by XRD. The in vitro anticancer activity of 1 has been evaluated against two human colon cancer cell lines. The IC(50) value for activity against HCT-116 was 224 ± 7 μM and 205 ± 5 μM against the Caco-2 cell line. The proficiency of 1 as an antibacterial agent was also evaluated against six bacterial strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration for Bacillus cereus was determined to be 5 μM and for Enterococcus faecalis it was 20 μM. At the maximum concentration tested the complex showed no activity against the Gram-negative strains. The complex binds strongly to human serum albumin with a binding constant of 1.37 ± 0.02 M(-1) at 308 K on a single binding site. It is also a strong binder to DNA with an apparent binding constant of 2.82 × 10(5) M(-1) at 308 K. 1 shows very good activity as a catalytic inhibitor of human topoisomerase II at concentrations as low as 20 μM. Show less

Ruthenium(II/III) metal complexes have been widely recognized as the alternative chemotherapeutic agents to overcome the drug resistance and tumor recurrence associated with platinum derivatives. In this work, a novel ruthenium(II) triazine complex namely, 1 ([Ru(bdpta)(tpy)]²⁺) was synthesized and spectroscopically characterized. Drug resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of Ru(II) complex 1. The complex 1 showed a greater cytotoxic potential with IC₅₀ values lower than that of cisplatin. The intracellular localization assay confirmed that the complex 1 was effectively distributed into mitochondria as well as endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and executed a ROS-mediated calcium and Bax/Bak dependent intrinsic apoptosis. Interestingly, direct interaction between complex 1 and glucose regulated protein 78 (GRP78), a protein associated with drug resistance caused the ROS-mediated ubiquitination of GRP78. Notably, western blot and confocal microscopy analysis confirmed that complex 1 significantly reduced the protein levels of GRP78. Dose-dependent in vivo antitumor efficacy against CD133+HCT-116 CSCs derived tumor xenograft further validated that complex 1 could be an effective chemotherapeutic agent. Show less

Many terpyridines and their metal complexes are known to exhibit remarkable potential for the interaction of biological targets. Notably, a subtle change in the structure of the ligand can influence these interactions significantly. In this regard, it would be very interesting to assess the binding affinity of functionalized molecules with DNA/BSA. In this work, a novel ester-based terpyridine (L) and the corresponding four metal complexes with Ni(II) (MC1), Cu(II) (MC2), Fe(III) (MC3) and Ru(III) (MC4) were prepared and structurally characterized using various spectroscopic and analytical techniques including the validation of molecular structures of ligand (L) and Ni(II)-Tpy complex (MC1). The EPR data demonstrate that MC1 is diamagnetic and other complexes (MC2-MC4) exhibit paramagnetic behavior. Additionally, the structures of ligands and metal complexes were determined using DFT studies and the same were utilized for the docking studies. Interestingly, MC3 and MC4 exhibit a predominant lowest binding energy of -9.62 Kcal/mol (with DNA) and -10.05 Kcal/mol (with BSA) respectively. The binding affinity of the ligand and its complexes with protein and DNA was evaluated by spectroscopic techniques. Notably, the cytotoxicity studies of L and MC1-MC4 were performed against the MCF-7 (human breast cancer) cell lines. The complex MC4 displayed great activity with an IC₅₀ of 3.5 ± 1.75 μM among all synthesized compounds and comparable with cisplatin. Show less

Treatments of N-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyrazine-2-carboxamide (HL₁) and N-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)pyrazine-2-carboxamide carboxamide ligands (HL₂) with [Ru(p-cymene)Cl₂]₂ and [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] precursors afforded the respective Ru(ii) complexes [Ru(L₁)(p-cymene)Cl] (Ru1), [Ru(L₂)(p-cymene)Cl] (Ru2), [Ru(L₁)(PPh₃)₂Cl] (Ru3), and [Ru(L₂)(PPh₃)₂Cl] (Ru4). These complexes were characterized by NMR, FT-IR spectroscopies, mass spectrometry, elemental analyses, and crystal X-ray crystallography for Ru2. The molecular structure of complex Ru2 contains one mono-anionic bidentate bound ligand and display pseudo-octahedral piano stool geometry around the Ru(ii) atom. The interactions with calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were investigated by spectroscopic techniques. The experimental binding studies suggest that complexes Ru1-Ru4 interact with DNA, primarily through minor groove binding, as supported by molecular docking results. Additionally, these complexes exhibit strong quenching of the fluorescence of tryptophan residues in BSA, displaying static quenching. The in vitro cytotoxicity studies of compounds Ru1-Ru4 were assessed in cancer cell lines (A549, PC-3, HT-29, Caco-2, and HeLa), as well as a non-cancer line (KMST-6). Compounds Ru1 and Ru2 exhibited superior cytotoxicity compared to Ru3 and Ru4. The in vitro cytotoxicity and selectivity of compounds Ru1 and Ru2 against A549, PC-3, and Caco-2 cell lines surpassed that of cisplatin. Show less

Title: Insights into the anticancer photodynamic activity of Ir(III) and Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes bearing β-carboline ligands. Abstract: Ir(III) and Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes are promising photosensitizers (PSs) for photodynamic therapy (PDT) due to their outstanding photophysical properties. Herein, one series of cyclometallated Ir(III) complexes and two series of Ru(II) polypyridyl derivatives bearing three different thiazolyl-β-carboline N^N' ligands have been synthesized, aiming to evaluate the impact of the different metal fragments ([Ir(C^N)2]+ or [Ru(N^N)2]2+) and N^N' ligands on the photophysical and biological properties. All the compounds exhibit remarkable photostability under blue-light irradiation and are emissive (605 < λem < 720 nm), with the Ru(II) derivatives displaying higher photoluminescence quantum yields and longer excited state lifetimes. The Ir PSs display pKa values between 5.9 and 7.9, whereas their Ru counterparts are less acidic (pKa > 9.3). The presence of the deprotonated form in the Ir-PSs favours the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) since, according to theoretical calculations, it features a low-lying ligand-centered triplet excited state (T1 = 3LC) with a long lifetime. All compounds have demonstrated anticancer activity. Ir(III) complexes 1-3 exhibit the highest cytotoxicity in dark conditions, comparable to cisplatin. Their activity is notably enhanced by blue-light irradiation, resulting in nanomolar IC50 values and phototoxicity indexes (PIs) between 70 and 201 in different cancer cell lines. The Ir(III) PSs are also activated by green (with PI between 16 and 19.2) and red light in the case of complex 3 (PI = 8.5). Their antitumor efficacy is confirmed by clonogenic assays and using spheroid models. The Ir(III) complexes rapidly enter cells, accumulating in mitochondria and lysosomes. Upon photoactivation, they generate ROS, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and lysosomal damage and ultimately cell apoptosis. Additionally, they inhibit cancer cell migration, a crucial step in metastasis. In contrast, Ru(II) complex 6 exhibits moderate mitochondrial activity. Overall, Ir(III) complexes 1-3 show potential for selective light-controlled cancer treatment, providing an alternative mechanism to chemotherapy and the ability to inhibit lethal cancer cell dissemination. Show less

Two ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(bpy)(2)(bfipH)](2+) (1) and [Ru(phen)(2)(bfipH)](2+) (2) have been synthesized and characterized. The DNA-binding behaviors of complexes were studied by using spectroscopic and viscosity measurements. Results suggested that the two complexes bind to DNA in an intercalative mode. Complexes 1 and 2 can efficiently photocleave pBR322 DNA in vitro under irradiation, singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)) was proved to contribute to the DNA photocleavage process. Topoisomerase inhibition and DNA strand passage assay confirmed that two Ru(II) complexes acted as efficient dual inhibitors of topoisomerases I and II. In MTT cytotoxicity studies, two Ru(II) complexes exhibited antitumor activity against BEL-7402, HeLa, MCF-7 tumor cells. The AO/EB staining assay indicated that Ru(II) complexes could induce the apoptosis of HeLa cells. Show less

Antineoplastic ruthenium(III) complexes are generally regarded as prodrugs, being activated by reduction. Within a homologous series of ruthenium(III) complexes, cytotoxic potency is therefore expected to increase with increasing ease of reduction. Complexes of the general formula [Ru(III)Cl((6-n))(ind)n](3-n)- (n = 0-4; ind = indazole; counterions = Hind(+) or Cl(-)) and the compound trans-[Ru(II)Cl(2)(ind)(4)] have been prepared and characterized electrochemically. Lever's parametrization method predicts that a higher indazole-to-chloride ratio results in a higher reduction potential, which is confirmed by cyclic voltammetry. In vitro antitumor potencies of these complexes in colon cancer cells (SW480) and ovarian cancer cells (CH1) vary by more than 2 orders of magnitude and increase in the following rank order: [Ru(III)Cl(6)](3-) < [Ru(III)Cl(4)(ind)(2)](-) < [Ru(III)Cl(5)(ind)](2-) << [Ru(III)Cl(3)(ind)(3)] < [Ru(III)Cl(2)(ind)(4)](+) approximately [Ru(II)Cl(2)(ind)(4)]. Thus, the observed differences in potency correlate with reduction potentials largely, though not perfectly, pointing to the influence of additional factors. Differences in the cellular uptake (probably resulting from different lipophilicity) contribute to this correlation but cannot solely account for it. Show less