👤 Menezes ACS

Title: Terpyridine-based ruthenium complexes containing a 4,5-diazafluoren-9-one ligand with light-driven enhancement of biological activity. Abstract: There has been growing effort in the scientific community to develop new antibiotics to address the major threat of bacterial resistance. One promising approach is the use of metal complexes that provide broader opportunities. Among these systems, polypyridine-ruthenium(II) complexes have received particular attention as drug candidates. Here, we prepared two new ruthenium(II) complexes with the formulation [Ru(DFO)(phtpy-R)Cl](PF6), where phtpy = 4'-phenyl-2,2':6',2''-terpyridine; R = -H(MPD1), -CH3(MPD2); and DFO = 4,5-diazafluoren-9-one, and investigated their chemical, biochemical and antibacterial activities. These compounds exhibit photoreactivity and produce reactive oxygen species (ROSs). Photogeneration of singlet oxygen (1O2) was measured in acetonitrile with significant quantum yields using blue light, Φ = 0.40 and 0.39 for MDP1 and MPD2, respectively. Further studies have shown that MPD1 and MPD2 can generate superoxide radicals. Antibacterial assays demonstrated a significant enhancement in MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) upon blue light irradiation (>32-fold), with MICs of 15.6 μg mL-1 (S. aureus, ATCC 700698) and 3.9 μg mL-1 (S. epidermidis, ATCC 35984) for both metal complexes. Interestingly, an MIC of 15.6 μg mL-1 for MPD1 and MPD2 was observed against S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 under red light irradiation. The latter results are encouraging, considering that red light penetrates deeper into the skin. In addition, no significant cytotoxicity was observed in some mammalian cells, even upon light irradiation, supporting their potential safety. Altogether, these data show evidence of the potential use of these compounds as antimicrobial photodynamic therapeutic agents, enriching our arsenal to combat this worldwide bacterial threat. Show less

This work describes the synthesis of three new ruthenium(ii) complexes with gallic acid and derivatives of the general formula [Ru(L)(dppb)(bipy)]PF₆, where L = gallate (GAC), benzoate (BAC), and esterified-gallate (EGA), bipy = 2,2'-bipyridine and dppb = 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane. The complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, molar conductivity, NMR, cyclic voltammetry, UV-vis and IR spectroscopy, and two of them by X-ray crystallography. Cell viability assays show promising results, indicating higher cytotoxicity of the complexes in MDA-MB-231 cells, a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line, compared with the hormone-dependent MCF-7 cell line. Studies in vitro with the MDA-MB-231 cell line showed that only Ru(BAC) and Ru(GAC) interacted with BSA. Besides that, the Ru(GAC) complex, which has a polyphenolic acid, interacted in an apo-Tf structure and function dependent manner and it was able to inhibit the formation of reactive oxygen species. Ru(GAC) was able to cause damage to the cellular cytoskeleton leading to inhibition of some cellular processes of TNBC cells, such as invasion, migration, and adhesion. Show less

The triple-negative breast cancer subtype (TNBC) is highly aggressive and metastatic and corresponds to 15-20% of diagnosed cases. TNBC treatment is hampered, because these cells usually do not respond to hormonal therapy, and they develop resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. On the other hand, the severe side effects of cisplatin represent an obstacle for its clinical use. Ruthenium (Ru)-based complexes have emerged as promising antitumor and antimetastatic substitutes for cisplatin. In this study, we demonstrated the effects of a Ru/biphosphine complex, containing gallic acid (GA) as a ligand, [Ru(GA)(dppe)₂]PF₆, hereafter called Ru(GA), on a TNBC cell line, and compared them to the effects in a nontumor breast cell line. Ru(GA) complex presented selective cytotoxicity against TNBC over nontumor cells, inhibited its migration and invasion, and induced apoptosis. These effects were associated with the increased amount of transferrin receptors (TfR) on tumor cells, compared to nontumor ones. Silencing of TfR decreased Ru(GA) effects on TNBC cells, demonstrating that these receptors were at least partially responsible for Ru(GA) delivery into tumor cells. The Ru(GA) compound must be further studied in different in vivo assays in order to investigate its antitumor properties and its toxicity in complex biological systems. Show less