👤 Moraes CAF

Title: Terpyridine-based ruthenium complexes containing a 4,5-diazafluoren-9-one ligand with light-driven enhancement of biological activity. Abstract: There has been growing effort in the scientific community to develop new antibiotics to address the major threat of bacterial resistance. One promising approach is the use of metal complexes that provide broader opportunities. Among these systems, polypyridine-ruthenium(II) complexes have received particular attention as drug candidates. Here, we prepared two new ruthenium(II) complexes with the formulation [Ru(DFO)(phtpy-R)Cl](PF6), where phtpy = 4'-phenyl-2,2':6',2''-terpyridine; R = -H(MPD1), -CH3(MPD2); and DFO = 4,5-diazafluoren-9-one, and investigated their chemical, biochemical and antibacterial activities. These compounds exhibit photoreactivity and produce reactive oxygen species (ROSs). Photogeneration of singlet oxygen (1O2) was measured in acetonitrile with significant quantum yields using blue light, Φ = 0.40 and 0.39 for MDP1 and MPD2, respectively. Further studies have shown that MPD1 and MPD2 can generate superoxide radicals. Antibacterial assays demonstrated a significant enhancement in MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) upon blue light irradiation (>32-fold), with MICs of 15.6 μg mL-1 (S. aureus, ATCC 700698) and 3.9 μg mL-1 (S. epidermidis, ATCC 35984) for both metal complexes. Interestingly, an MIC of 15.6 μg mL-1 for MPD1 and MPD2 was observed against S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 under red light irradiation. The latter results are encouraging, considering that red light penetrates deeper into the skin. In addition, no significant cytotoxicity was observed in some mammalian cells, even upon light irradiation, supporting their potential safety. Altogether, these data show evidence of the potential use of these compounds as antimicrobial photodynamic therapeutic agents, enriching our arsenal to combat this worldwide bacterial threat. Show less

Cancer resistance to chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin presents a significant challenge, leading to treatment failure and poor outcomes. Novel metal-based compounds offer a promising strategy to overcome drug resistance and to enhance efficacy. Four Ru(II) complexes with fenamic acid derivatives were synthesized and characterized: [Ru(L)(bipy)(dppp)]PF₆, where L represents fenamic acid (HFen, complex 1), mefenamic acid (HMFen, complex 2), tolfenamic acid (HTFen, complex 3), and flufenamic acid (HFFen, complex 4). Their composition was supported by molar conductivity, elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and ³¹P{¹H}, ¹H, and ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance, with the crystal structure of complex 1 confirmed via X-ray diffraction. Complexes 1-4 exhibited notable cytotoxicity against tested cell lines, particularly A2780 and A2780cisR (cisplatin-resistant ovarian tumors), compared to MDA-MB-231 (breast) and A549 (lung) lines. Mechanistic studies revealed weak DNA interactions through minor grooves or electrostatic binding. Cellular uptake assays showed effective internalization of complexes 1 (3.6%) and 2 (4.5%), correlating with potent IC₅₀ values. These complexes also altered cell morphology, reduced cell density, and inhibited colony formation in the A2780 cells. Staining assays indicated induced cell death and organelle damage, highlighting their potential as promising antitumor agents. Show less

Title: "Half-Sandwich" Ruthenium Complexes with Alizarin as Anticancer Agents: Abstract: Upon exploration of the chemistry of the combination of ruthenium/arene with anthraquinone alizarin (L), three new complexes with the general formulas [Ru(L)Cl(η6-p-cymene)] (C1), [Ru(L)(η6-p-cymene)(PPh3)]PF6 (C2), and [Ru(L)(η6-p-cymene)(PEt3)]PF6 (C3) were synthesized and characterized using spectroscopic techniques (mass, IR, and 1D and 2D NMR), molar conductivity, elemental analysis, and X-ray diffraction. Complex C1 exhibited fluorescence, such as free alizarin, while in C2 and C3, the emission was probably quenched by monophosphines and the crystallographic data showed that hydrophobic interactions are predominant in intermolecular contacts. The cytotoxicity of the complexes was evaluated in the MDA-MB-231 (triple-negative breast cancer), MCF-7 (breast cancer), and A549 (lung) tumor cell lines and MCF-10A (breast) and MRC-5 (lung) nontumor cell lines. Complexes C1 and C2 were more selective to the breast tumor cell lines, and C2 was the most cytotoxic (IC50 = 6.5 μM for MDA-MB-231). In addition, compound C1 performs a covalent interaction with DNA, while C2 and C3 present only weak interactions; however, internalization studies by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy showed that complex C1 does not accumulate in viable MDA-MB-231 cells and is detected in the cytoplasm only after cell permeabilization. Investigations of the mechanism of action of the complexes indicate that C2 promotes cell cycle arrest in the Sub-G1 phase in MDA-MB-231, inhibits its colony formation, and has a possible antimetastatic action, impeding cell migration in the wound-healing experiment (13% of wound healing in 24 h). The in vivo toxicological experiments with zebrafish indicate that C1 and C3 exhibit the most zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity (inhibition of spontaneous movements and heartbeats), while C2, the most promising anticancer drug in the in vitro preclinical tests, revealed the lowest toxicity in in vivo preclinical screening. Show less

We report here on three new ruthenium(II) complexes, [Ru(DPEPhos)(mtz)(bipy)]PF₆ (Ru1), [Ru(DPEPhos)(mmi)(bipy)]PF₆ (Ru2) and [Ru(DPEPhos)(dmp)(bipy)]PF₆ (Ru3). DPEPhos = bis-[(2-diphenylphosphino)phenyl]ether, mtz = 2-mercapto-2-thiazoline, mmi = 2-mercapto-1-methylimidazole, dmp = 4,6-diamino-2-mercaptopyrimidine and bipy = 2,2'-bipyridine. The compounds were characterized by several spectroscopic techniques, and the molecular structure of Ru1 complex was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The cytotoxicity of Ru1 - Ru3 complexes were tested against the A549 (human lung) and the MDA-MB-231 (human breast) cancer cell lines and against MRC-5 (non-tumor lung) and MCF-10A (non-tumor breast) cell lines through the MTT assay. All three complexes are cytotoxic against the cell lines studied, with IC₅₀ values lower than those found for the cisplatin. Among them, the Ru2 complex has shown the best selectivity against MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines, with an IC₅₀ value 12 times lower than that on MCF-10A. The complex Ru2 was capable to induce changes in MDA-MB-231 cells morphology, with loss of cellular adhesion, inhibited colony formation and induce an accumulation of cells at the sub-G1 phase, with an increase in S-phase and decrease of cells at G2 phase. Viscosity, electrochemical and Hoechst 33258 displacement experiments for Ru1 - Ru3 complexes with calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) showed an electrostatic and groove binding mode of interaction. Additionally, the complexes interact with the protein Human Serum Albumin (HSA) by static mechanism. The negative values for ΔH and ΔS indicate that van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding may occurs between the complexes and HSA. Therefore, this class of complexes are promising anticancer candidates and may be selected to further detailed studies. Show less

For the first time, we herein report on the syntheses of two new Ru(II)/bipyridine/phenanthroline complexes containing lapachol as ligand: complex (1), [Ru (bipy)₂(Lap)]PF₆ and complex (2), [Ru(Lap)(phen)₂]PF₆, where bipy = 2,2'-bipyridine and ph en = 1,10-phenanthroline; Lap = lapachol (2-hydroxy-3-(3-methylbut-2-en-1- yl)naphthalene-1,4-dione). The complexes were synthesized and characterized by elemental analyses, molar conductivity, mass spectrometry, ultraviolet-visible and infrared spectroscopies, nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H, ¹³C), and single crystal X-ray diffraction, for complex (2). In addition, in vitro cytotoxicity was tested against six cancer cells: A549 (lung carcinoma); DU-145 (human prostate carcinoma); HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma), PC-3 (human prostate adenocarcinoma); MDA-MB-231 (human breast adenocarcinoma); Caco-2 (human colorectal adenocarcinoma), and against two non-cancer cells, FGH (human gingival normal fibroblasts) and PNT-2 (prostate epithelial cells). Complex (1) was slightly more toxic and selective than complex (2) for all cell lines, except against the A549 cells, where (2) was more potent than complex (1). The complexes induced an increase in the reactive oxygen species, and the co-treatment with N-acetyl-L-cysteine remarkably suppressed the ROS generation and prevented the reduction of cell viability, suggesting that the cytotoxicity of the complexes is related to the ROS-mediated pathway. Further studies indicated that the complexes may bind to DNA via minor groove interaction. Our studies also revealed that free Lap induces gene mutations in Salmonella Typhimurium, nevertheless, the complexes demonstrated the absence of genotoxicity by the Ames test. The present study provides a relevant contribution to understanding the anti-cancer potential and genetic toxicological events of new ruthenium complexes containing the lapachol molecule as a ligand. Show less