👤 Manzano BR.

One approach to reduce the side effects of chemotherapy in cancer treatment is photodynamic therapy (PDT), which allows spatiotemporal control of the cytotoxicity. We have used the strategy of coordinating π-expansive ligands to increase the excited state lifetimes of Ir(III) half-sandwich complexes in order to facilitate the generation of ¹O₂. We have obtained derivatives of formulas [Cp*Ir(C^∧N)Cl] and [Cp*Ir(C^∧N)L]BF₄ with different degrees of π-expansion in the C^∧N ligands. Complexes with the more π-expansive ligand are very effective photosensitizers with phototoxic indexes PI > 2000. Furthermore, PI values of 63 were achieved with red light. Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations nicely explain the effect of the π-expansion. The complexes produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) at the cellular level, causing mitochondrial membrane depolarization, cleavage of DNA, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) oxidation, as well as lysosomal damage. Consequently, cell death by apoptosis and secondary necrosis is activated. Thus, we describe the first class of half-sandwich iridium cyclometalated complexes active in PDT. Show less

Despite their outstanding properties as potential photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy (PDT), Ir(III) biscyclometalated complexes need both further developments to overcome remaining limitations and in-depth investigations into their mechanisms of action to reach clinic application in the treatment of cancer. This work describes the synthesis of a family of Ir(III) complexes of general formula [Ir(C^N)₂(N^N')]Cl (N^N' = thiabendazole-based ligands; C^N = ppy (2-phenylpyridinate) (Series A), or dfppy (2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridinate) (Series B)) and their evaluation as potential PDT agents. These complexes are partially soluble in water and exhibit cytotoxic activity in the absence of light irradiation versus several cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the cytotoxic activity of derivatives of Series A is enhanced upon irradiation, particularly for complexes [1a]Cl and [3a]Cl, which show phototoxicity indexes (PI) above 20. Endocytosis was established as the uptake mechanism for [1a]Cl and [3a]Cl in prostate cancer cells by flow cytometry. These derivatives mainly accumulate in the mitochondria as shown by colocalization confocal microscopy experiments. Presumably, [1a]Cl and [3a]Cl induce death on cancer cells under irradiation through apoptosis triggered by a multimodal mechanism of action, which likely involves damage over mitochondrial DNA and mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Both processes seem to be the result of photocatalytic oxidation processes. Show less

A new family of neutral ruthenium(II) arene complexes of the type [Ru(η⁶-arene)X(κ²- O, N-L)] (η⁶-arene = p-cym, bz; X = Cl^-, SCN^-; HL1 = 2-(2'-hydroxyphenyl)benzimidazole, HL2 = 2-(2'-hydroxyphenyl)benzothiazole) has been synthesized and characterized. The cytotoxic activity of the Ru(II) complexes was evaluated in several tumor cell lines (A549, HepG2 and SW480) both in the dark and after soft irradiation with UV and blue light. None of the complexes bearing benzimidazole (HL1) as a ligand displayed phototoxicity, whereas the complexes with a benzothiazole ligand (HL2) exhibited photoactivation; the sensitivity observed for UV was higher than for blue light irradiation. The interesting results displayed by HL2 and [Ru(η⁶- p-cym)(NCS)(κ²- O, N-L2)], [3a], in terms of photo cytotoxicity prompted us to analyze their interaction with DNA, both in the dark and under irradiation conditions, in an effort to shed some light on their mechanism of action. The results of this study revealed that HL2 interacts with DNA by groove binding, whereas [3a] interacts by a dual mode of binding, an external groove binding, and covalent binding of the metal center to the guanine moiety. Interestingly, both HL2 and [3a] display a clear preference for AT base pairs, and this causes fluorescence enhancement. Additionally, cleavage of the pUC18 plasmid DNA by the complex is observed upon irradiation. The study of the irradiated form demonstrates that the arene ligand is released to yield species such as [Ru(κ²- O, N-L2)(κ¹- S-DMSO)₂(μ-SCN)]₂ [3c] and [Ru(κ²- O, N-L2)(κ¹- S-DMSO)₃(SCN)] [3d]. Such photo dissociation occurs even in the absence of oxygen and leads to cytotoxicity enhancement, an effect attributed to the presence of [3d], thus revealing the potential of [3a] as a pro-drug for photoactivated anticancer chemotherapy (PACT). Show less

The synthesis and characterization of Pt(II) (1 and 2) and Ru(II) arene (3 and 4) or polypyridine (5 and 6) complexes is described. With the aim of having a functional group to form bioconjugates, one uncoordinated carboxyl group has been introduced in all complexes. Some of the complexes were selected for their potential in photodynamic therapy (PDT). The molecular structures of complexes 2 and 5, as well as that of the sodium salt of the 4'-(4-carboxyphenyl)-2,2':6',2″-terpyridine ligand (cptpy), were determined by X-ray diffraction. Different techniques were used to evaluate the binding capacity to model DNA molecules, and MTT cytotoxicity assays were performed against four cell lines. Compounds 3, 4, and 5 showed little tendency to bind to DNA and exhibited poor biological activity. Compound 2 behaves as bonded to DNA probably through a covalent interaction, although its cytotoxicity was very low. Compound 1 and possibly 6, both of which contain a cptpy ligand, were able to intercalate with DNA, but toxicity was not observed for 6. However, compound 1 was active in all cell lines tested. Clonogenic assays and apoptosis induction studies were also performed on the PC-3 line for 1. The photodynamic behavior for complexes 1, 5, and 6 indicated that their nuclease activity was enhanced after irradiation at λ = 447 nm. The cell viability was significantly reduced only in the case of 5. The different behavior in the absence or presence of light makes complex 5 a potential prodrug of interest in PDT. Molecular docking studies followed by molecular dynamics simulations for 1 and the counterpart without the carboxyl group confirmed the experimental data that pointed to an intercalation mechanism. The cytotoxicity of 1 and the potential of 5 in PDT make them good candidates for subsequent conjugation, through the carboxyl group, to "selected peptides" which could facilitate the selective vectorization of the complex toward receptors that are overexpressed in neoplastic cell lines. Show less

The ligands 2-pyridin-2-yl-1H-benzimidazole (HL(1)), 1-methyl-2-pyridin-2-ylbenzimidazole (HL(2)), and 2-(1H-imidazol-2-yl)pyridine (HL(3)) and the proligand 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole (HL(4)) have been used to prepare five different types of new ruthenium(II) arene compounds: (i) monocationic complexes with the general formula [(η(6)-arene)RuCl(κ(2)-N,N-HL)]Y [HL = HL(1), HL(2), or HL(3); Y = Cl or BF4; arene = 2-phenoxyethanol (phoxet), benzene (bz), or p-cymene (p-cym)]; (ii) dicationic aqua complexes of the formula [(η(6)-arene)Ru(OH2)(κ(2)-N,N-HL(1))](Y)2 (Y = Cl or TfO; arene = phoxet, bz, or p-cym); (iii) the nucleobase derivative [(η(6)-arene)Ru(9-MeG)(κ(2)-N,N-HL(1))](PF6)2 (9-MeG = 9-methylguanine); (iv) neutral complexes consistent with the formulation [(η(6)-arene)RuCl(κ(2)-N,N-L(1))] (arene = bz or p-cym); (v) the neutral cyclometalated complex [(η(6)-p-cym)RuCl(κ(2)-N,C-L(4))]. The cytototoxic activity of the new ruthenium(II) arene compounds has been evaluated in several cell lines (MCR-5, MCF-7, A2780, and A2780cis) in order to establish structure-activity relationships. Three of the compounds with the general formula [(η(6)-arene)RuCl(κ(2)-N,N-HL(1))]Cl differing in the arene moiety have been studied in depth in terms of thermodynamic dissociation constants, aquation kinetic constants, and DNA binding measurements. The biologically most active compound is the p-cym derivative, which strongly destabilizes the DNA double helix, whereas those with bz and phoxet have only a small effect on the stability of the DNA double helix. Moreover, the inhibitory activity of several compounds toward CDK1 has also been evaluated. The DNA binding ability of some of the studied compounds and their CDK1 inhibitory effect suggest a multitarget mechanism for their biological activity. Show less

New cationic, half-sandwich Ru(II) arene compounds of general formula [(η(6)-arene)RuCl(κ(2)-N,N-L)]X (where L are functionalized phenanthrolines such as 1,10-phenanthroline-5-amine (aphen); 5,6-epoxy-5,6-dihydro-[1,10]phenanthroline (ephen); or 4,7-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline (dhphen)) have been prepared to study their anticancer potential. All the isolated complexes have been fully characterized by spectroscopic and analytical techniques. The structure of endo-[(η(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(κ(2)-N,N-ephen)]BF4, [2a](BF4), has been determined by X-ray crystallography. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the aphen and ephen phenanthrolines and their Ru derivatives [(η(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(κ(2)-N,N-L)]Cl ([1a]Cl and [2a]Cl, respectively) assessed in tumour cell lines has shown that the free ligands are more active than the organometallic products, with aphen being the most potent specimen. Furthermore, the binding interaction of both [1a]Cl and aphen with calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) has been investigated using a variety of thermodynamic and kinetic techniques. The aphen free ligand intercalates into DNA at low ligand content, whereas [1a]Cl forms with DNA a bifunctional partially intercalated-covalent complex, in which the intercalation constant is nearly three orders of magnitude lower than that of aphen. This finding demonstrates that the covalent binding noticeably weakens the intercalation, a feature presumably related to the higher cytotoxic activity of aphen relative to that of [1a]Cl. Show less

The synthesis and full characterization of the new aqua-complex [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(OH2)(κ(2)-N,N-2-pydaT)](BF4)2, [2](BF4)2, and the nucleobase derivative [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(9-MeG)(κ(2)-N,N-2-pydaT)](BF4)2, [4](PF6)2, where 2-pydaT = 2,4-diamino-6-(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine and 9-MeG = 9-methylguanine, are reported here. The crystal structures of both [4](PF6)2 and the chloro complex [(η(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(κ(2)-N,N-2-pydaT)](PF6), [1](PF6), have been elucidated by X-ray diffraction. The former provided relevant information regarding the interaction of the metallic fragment [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(κ(2)-N,N-2-pydaT)](2+) and a simple model of DNA. NMR and kinetic absorbance studies have proven that the aqua-complex [2](BF4)2 binds to the N7 site of guanine in nucleobases, nucleotides, or DNA. A stable bifunctional interaction (covalent and partially intercalated) between the [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(κ(2)-N,N-2-pydaT)](2+) fragment and CT-DNA has been corroborated by kinetic, circular dichroism, viscometry, and thermal denaturation experiments. The reaction mechanism entails the very fast formation of the Ru-O-(PO3) linkage prior to the fast intercalation of the 2-pydaT fragment. Then, a Ru-N7-(G) covalent bond is formed at the expense of the Ru-O-(PO3) bond, yielding a bifunctional complex. The dissociation rate of the intercalated fragment is slow, and this confers additional interest to [2](BF4)2 in view of the likely correlation between slow dissociation and biological activity, on the assumption that DNA is the only biotarget. Furthermore, [2](BF4)2 displays notable pH-dependent cytotoxic activity in human ovarian carcinoma cells (A2780, IC50 = 11.0 μM at pH = 7.4; IC50 = 6.58 μM at pH = 6.5). What is more, complex [2](BF4)2 is not cross-resistant with cisplatin, exhibiting a resistance factor, RF(A2780cis), of 0.28, and it shows moderate selectivity toward the cancer cell lines, in particular, A2780cis (IC50 = 3.0 5 ± 0.08 μM), relative to human lung fibroblast cells (MRC-5; IC50 = 24 μM), the model for healthy cells. Show less

Aminophosphines 2-(diphenylphosphino)-1-methylimidazole (dpim) and diphenyl-2-pyridylphosphine (PPh(2)py) have been used to prepare two series of Ru(II) arene complexes of formulae [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(κ(2)-O,O'-X)(κ(1)-P-dpim)]Y (series a: 1a·Y-3a·Y) and [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(κ(2)-O,O'-X)(κ(1)-P-PPh(2)py)]Y (series b: 1b·Y-3b·Y) (where X=acac, acetylacetonate; bzac, benzoyl acetonate; dbzm, dibenzoyl methanoate; Y=BF(4), BPh(4)). The structures of 1a·BF(4), 1a·BPh(4), 3a·BF(4), 1b·BPh(4) and 3b·BPh(4) were determined by X-ray diffraction. The tetrafluoroborate derivatives are more soluble in organic solvents than their tetraphenylborate counterparts. Five BF(4)(-) derivatives (all except the unstable 1b·BF(4)) were selected to evaluate the cytotoxic behavior in vitro against the human cancer cell lines MCF-7 (breast cancer) and CAPAN-1 (pancreatic cancer). 2b·BF(4) and 3b·BF(4) exhibited IC(50) values similar to those of cisplatin. Electrophoresis and AFM studies showed good correspondence between the biological activity levels of 2b·BF(4) and 3b·BF(4) and their ability to modify the DNA structure. Hydrolytic studies indicate that aquation could be involved in the activation mechanism of these complexes and confirm that the hydrolysis rate of 3b·BF(4) is higher than that of 3a·BF(4). Thus, the cytotoxic activity trends are explained in terms of the higher reactivity of derivatives from series b, which in turn is rationalized as being the result of the electronic features of dpim and PPh(2)py established by cyclic voltammetry measurements. Show less