Despite their outstanding properties as potential photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy (PDT), Ir(III) biscyclometalated complexes need both further developments to overcome remaining limitations Show more
Despite their outstanding properties as potential photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy (PDT), Ir(III) biscyclometalated complexes need both further developments to overcome remaining limitations and in-depth investigations into their mechanisms of action to reach clinic application in the treatment of cancer. This work describes the synthesis of a family of Ir(III) complexes of general formula [Ir(C^N)2(N^N')]Cl (N^N'Â =Â thiabendazole-based ligands; C^NÂ =Â ppy (2-phenylpyridinate) (Series A), or dfppy (2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridinate) (Series B)) and their evaluation as potential PDT agents. These complexes are partially soluble in water and exhibit cytotoxic activity in the absence of light irradiation versus several cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the cytotoxic activity of derivatives of Series A is enhanced upon irradiation, particularly for complexes [1a]Cl and [3a]Cl, which show phototoxicity indexes (PI) above 20. Endocytosis was established as the uptake mechanism for [1a]Cl and [3a]Cl in prostate cancer cells by flow cytometry. These derivatives mainly accumulate in the mitochondria as shown by colocalization confocal microscopy experiments. Presumably, [1a]Cl and [3a]Cl induce death on cancer cells under irradiation through apoptosis triggered by a multimodal mechanism of action, which likely involves damage over mitochondrial DNA and mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Both processes seem to be the result of photocatalytic oxidation processes. Show less
The synthesis and characterization of Pt(II) (1 and 2) and Ru(II) arene (3 and 4) or polypyridine (5 and 6) complexes is described. With the aim of having a functional group to form bioconjugates, one Show more
The synthesis and characterization of Pt(II) (1 and 2) and Ru(II) arene (3 and 4) or polypyridine (5 and 6) complexes is described. With the aim of having a functional group to form bioconjugates, one uncoordinated carboxyl group has been introduced in all complexes. Some of the complexes were selected for their potential in photodynamic therapy (PDT). The molecular structures of complexes 2 and 5, as well as that of the sodium salt of the 4'-(4-carboxyphenyl)-2,2':6',2âł-terpyridine ligand (cptpy), were determined by X-ray diffraction. Different techniques were used to evaluate the binding capacity to model DNA molecules, and MTT cytotoxicity assays were performed against four cell lines. Compounds 3, 4, and 5 showed little tendency to bind to DNA and exhibited poor biological activity. Compound 2 behaves as bonded to DNA probably through a covalent interaction, although its cytotoxicity was very low. Compound 1 and possibly 6, both of which contain a cptpy ligand, were able to intercalate with DNA, but toxicity was not observed for 6. However, compound 1 was active in all cell lines tested. Clonogenic assays and apoptosis induction studies were also performed on the PC-3 line for 1. The photodynamic behavior for complexes 1, 5, and 6 indicated that their nuclease activity was enhanced after irradiation at λ = 447 nm. The cell viability was significantly reduced only in the case of 5. The different behavior in the absence or presence of light makes complex 5 a potential prodrug of interest in PDT. Molecular docking studies followed by molecular dynamics simulations for 1 and the counterpart without the carboxyl group confirmed the experimental data that pointed to an intercalation mechanism. The cytotoxicity of 1 and the potential of 5 in PDT make them good candidates for subsequent conjugation, through the carboxyl group, to "selected peptides" which could facilitate the selective vectorization of the complex toward receptors that are overexpressed in neoplastic cell lines. Show less
Aminophosphines 2-(diphenylphosphino)-1-methylimidazole (dpim) and diphenyl-2-pyridylphosphine (PPh(2)py) have been used to prepare two series of Ru(II) arene complexes of formulae [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru( Show more
Aminophosphines 2-(diphenylphosphino)-1-methylimidazole (dpim) and diphenyl-2-pyridylphosphine (PPh(2)py) have been used to prepare two series of Ru(II) arene complexes of formulae [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(Îș(2)-O,O'-X)(Îș(1)-P-dpim)]Y (series a: 1a·Y-3a·Y) and [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(Îș(2)-O,O'-X)(Îș(1)-P-PPh(2)py)]Y (series b: 1b·Y-3b·Y) (where X=acac, acetylacetonate; bzac, benzoyl acetonate; dbzm, dibenzoyl methanoate; Y=BF(4), BPh(4)). The structures of 1a·BF(4), 1a·BPh(4), 3a·BF(4), 1b·BPh(4) and 3b·BPh(4) were determined by X-ray diffraction. The tetrafluoroborate derivatives are more soluble in organic solvents than their tetraphenylborate counterparts. Five BF(4)(-) derivatives (all except the unstable 1b·BF(4)) were selected to evaluate the cytotoxic behavior in vitro against the human cancer cell lines MCF-7 (breast cancer) and CAPAN-1 (pancreatic cancer). 2b·BF(4) and 3b·BF(4) exhibited IC(50) values similar to those of cisplatin. Electrophoresis and AFM studies showed good correspondence between the biological activity levels of 2b·BF(4) and 3b·BF(4) and their ability to modify the DNA structure. Hydrolytic studies indicate that aquation could be involved in the activation mechanism of these complexes and confirm that the hydrolysis rate of 3b·BF(4) is higher than that of 3a·BF(4). Thus, the cytotoxic activity trends are explained in terms of the higher reactivity of derivatives from series b, which in turn is rationalized as being the result of the electronic features of dpim and PPh(2)py established by cyclic voltammetry measurements. Show less