👤 Dwivedi BK

By controlled Anderson type rearrangement reactions complexes of the general formula trans-[Os(IV)Cl(4)(Hazole)(2)], where Hazole = 1H-pyrazole, 2H-indazole, 1H-imidazole, and 1H-benzimidazole, have been synthesized. Note that 2H-indazole tautomer stabilization in trans-[Os(IV)Cl(4)(2H-indazole)(2)] is unprecedented in coordination chemistry of indazole. The metal ion in these compounds possesses the same coordination environment as ruthenium(III) in (H(2)ind)[Ru(III)Cl(4)(Hind)(2)], where Hind = 1H-indazole, (KP1019), an investigational anticancer drug in phase I clinical trials. These osmium(IV) complexes are appropriate precursors for the synthesis of osmium(III) analogues of KP1019. In addition the formation of an adduct of trans-[Os(IV)Cl(4)(Hpz)(2)] with cucurbit[7]uril is described. The compounds have been comprehensively characterized by elemental analysis, EI and ESI mass spectrometry, spectroscopy (IR, UV-vis, 1D and 2D NMR), cyclic voltammetry, and X-ray crystallography. Their antiproliferative acitivity in the human cancer cell lines CH1 (ovarian carcinoma), A549 (nonsmall cell lung carcinoma), and SW480 (colon carcinoma) is reported. Show less

The ruthenium compound KP1019 has demonstrated promising anticancer activity in a pilot clinical trial. This study aims to evaluate the intracellular uptake/binding patterns of KP1019 and its sodium salt KP1339, which is currently in a phase I-IIa study. Although KP1339 tended to be moderately less cytotoxic than KP1019, IC(50) values in several cancer cell models revealed significant correlation of the cytotoxicity profiles, suggesting similar targets for the two drugs. Accordingly, both drugs activated apoptosis, indicated by caspase activation via comparable pathways. Drug uptake determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was completed after 1 h, corresponding to full cytotoxicity as early as after 3 h of drug exposure. Surprisingly, the total cellular drug uptake did not correlate with cytotoxicity. However, distinct differences in intracellular distribution patterns suggested that the major targets for the two ruthenium drugs are cytosolic rather than nuclear. Consequently, drug-protein binding in cytosolic fractions of drug-treated cells was analyzed by native size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled online with ICP-MS. Ruthenium-protein binding of KP1019- and KP1339-treated cells distinctly differed from the platinum binding pattern observed after cisplatin treatment. An adapted SEC-SEC-ICP-MS system identified large protein complexes/aggregates above 700 kDa as initial major binding partners in the cytosol, followed by ruthenium redistribution to the soluble protein weight fraction below 40 kDa. Taken together, our data indicate that KP1019 and KP1339 rapidly enter tumor cells, followed by binding to larger protein complexes/organelles. The different protein binding patterns as compared with those for cisplatin suggest specific protein targets and consequently a unique mode of action for the ruthenium drugs investigated. Show less

The synthesis of new modified indolo[3,2-c]quinoline ligands L(1)-L(8) with metal-binding sites is reported. By coordination to ruthenium- and osmium-arene moieties 16 complexes of the type [(η(6)-p-cymene)M(L)Cl]Cl (1a,b-8a,b), where M is Ru(II) or Os(II) and L is L(1)-L(8), have been prepared. All compounds were comprehensively characterized by elemental analysis, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, IR, UV-vis, and NMR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction (2a, 4a, 4b, 5a, 7a, and 7b). The complexes were tested for antiproliferative activity in vitro in three human cancer cell lines, namely, CH1 (ovarian carcinoma), SW480 (colon adenocarcinoma), and A549 (non-small-cell lung cancer), yielding IC(50) values in the submicromolar or low micromolar range. Show less

Ruthenium(II)-arene complexes of general formulae [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(L(1-3))Cl(2)], where L(1-3) is 3-acetylpyridine (1), 4-acetylpyridine (2) and 2-amino-5-chloropyridine (3), correspondingly, [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(HL(4,5))Cl(2)], where HL(4) and HL(5) are respectively isonicotinic acid (4) and nicotinic acid (5) and [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(HL(6-9))Cl], where H(2)L(6-9) represent 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (6), 2,4-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (7), 2,5-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (8) and 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (9), were prepared by the reaction of [(eta(6)-p-cymene)(2)RuCl(2)](2) (10) with the corresponding ligand in 1:2 molar ratio in isopropanol. The complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, mass spectrometry, IR and NMR spectroscopies. According to these data the molecules adopt the usual "three-leg piano-stool" geometry which is common for this type of complexes. The structures of 1 and 7 were determined by X-ray crystallography. The complexes revealed low antiproliferative activity in six investigated tumor cell lines (HeLa, B16, FemX, MDA-MB-361, MDA-MB-453 and LS-174). The reaction of 6 with 9-methyladenine was studied by (1)H NMR, (1)H, (1)H COSY and (1)H, (1)H NOESY spectroscopy. Show less

The antitumour activity of the organometallic ruthenium(ii)-arene mixed phosphine complexes, [Ru(eta(6)-p-cymene)Cl(PTA)(PPh(3))]BF(4) and [Ru(eta(6)-C(6)H(5)CH(2)CH(2)OH)Cl(PTA)(PPh(3))]BF(4) (PTA = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane), have been evaluated in vitro and compared to their RAPTA analogues, [Ru(eta(6)-p-cymene)Cl(2)(PTA)] and [Ru(eta(6)-C(6)H(5)CH(2)CH(2)OH)Cl(2)(PTA)] . The results show that the addition of the PPh(3) ligand to increases the cytotoxicity towards the TS/A adenocarcinoma cancer cells, which correlates with increased uptake, but also increases cytotoxicity to non-tumourigenic HBL-100 cells, thus decreasing selectivity. The decrease in selectivity has been correlated to increased DNA interactions relative to proteins, demonstrated by reactivity of the compounds with a 14-mer oligonucleotide and the model proteins ubiquitin and cytochrome-c. Show less

KP1019 [indazolium trans-[tetrachlorobis(1H-indazole)ruthenate (III)] (FFC14A) is a metal complex with promising anticancer activity. Since chemoresistance is a major obstacle in chemotherapy, this study investigated the influence of several drug resistance mechanisms on the anticancer activity of KP1019. Here we demonstrate that the cytotoxic effects of KP1019 are neither substantially hampered by overexpression of the drug resistance proteins multidrug resistance-related protein 1, breast cancer resistance protein, and lung resistance protein nor the transferrin receptor and only marginally by the cellular p53 status. In contrast, P-glycoprotein overexpression weakly but significantly (up to 2-fold) reduced KP1019 activity. P-glycoprotein-related resistance was based on reduced intracellular KP1019 accumulation and reversible by known P-glycoprotein modulators. KP1019 dose dependently inhibited ATPase activity of P-glycoprotein with a K(i) of approximately 31 microM. Furthermore, it potently blocked P-glycoprotein-mediated rhodamine 123 efflux under serum-free conditions (EC(50), approximately 8 microM), however, with reduced activity at increased serum concentrations (EC(50) at 10% serum, approximately 35 microM). Moreover, P-glycoprotein-mediated daunomycin resistance could only be marginally restored by KP1019 in serum-containing medium, also indicating an influence of serum proteins on the interaction between KP1019 and P-glycoprotein. Acquired KP1019 resistance was investigated by selecting KB-3-1 cells against KP1019 for more than 1 year. Only an approximately 2-fold KP1019 resistance could be induced, which unexpectedly was not due to overexpression of P-glycoprotein or other efflux pumps. Accordingly, KP1019-resistant cells did not display reduced drug accumulation. Their unique cross-resistance pattern confirmed an ABC transporter-independent resistance phenotype. In summary, the likeliness of acquiring insensitivity to KP1019 during therapy is expected to be low, and resistance should not be based on overexpression of drug efflux transporters. Show less