← Back
Monitoring mitochondrial viscosity with anticancer phosphorescent Ir(iii) complexes via two-photon lifetime imaging.
Chemical
Science
Volume 10 Number 5 7 February 2019 Pages 1259–1564
rsc.li/chemical-science
ISSN 2041-6539
EDGE ARTICLE
Cai-Ping Tan, Zong-Wan Mao et al.
Monitoring mitochondrial viscosity with anticancer
phosphorescent Ir(III) complexes via two-photon
lifetime imaging
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Chemical
Science
View Article Online
EDGE ARTICLE
Cite this: Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285
All publication charges for this article
have been paid for by the Royal Society
of Chemistry
View Journal | View Issue
Monitoring mitochondrial viscosity with anticancer
phosphorescent Ir(III) complexes via two-photon
lifetime imaging†
Liang Hao, Zhi-Wei Li, Dong-Yang Zhang, Liang He, Wenting Liu, Jing Yang,
Cai-Ping Tan,* Liang-Nian Ji and Zong-Wan Mao *
Precise quantitative measurement of viscosity at the subcellular level presents great challenges. Twophoton phosphorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (TPPLIM) can reflect micro-environmental
changes of a chromophore in a quantitative manner. Phosphorescent iridium complexes are potential
TPPLIM probes due to their rich photophysical properties including environment-sensitive longlifetime emission and high two-photon absorption (TPA) properties. In this work, a series of iridium(III)
complexes containing rotatable groups are developed as mitochondria-targeting anticancer agents
and quantitative viscosity probes. Among them, Ir6 ([Ir(ppy-CHO)2(dppe)]PF6; ppy-CHO: 4-(2-pyridyl)
benzaldehyde; dppe: cis-1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethene) shows satisfactory TPA properties and
long lifetimes (up to 1 ms). The emission intensities and lifetimes of Ir6 are viscosity-dependent, which
is mainly attributed to the configurational changes in the diphosphine ligand as proved by 1H NMR
spectra. Ir6 displays potent cytotoxicity, and mechanism investigations show that it can accumulate in
mitochondria and induce apoptotic cell death. Moreover, Ir6 can induce mitochondrial dysfunction
and monitor the changes in mitochondrial viscosity simultaneously in a real-time and quantitative
Received 24th September 2018
Accepted 3rd December 2018
manner via TPPLIM. Upon Ir6 treatment, a time-dependent increase in viscosity and heterogeneity is
observed along with the loss of membrane potential in mitochondria. In summary, our work shows
that
multifunctional
phosphorescent
metal
complexes
can
induce
and
precisely
detect
DOI: 10.1039/c8sc04242j
microenvironmental changes simultaneously at the subcellular level using TPPLIM, which may deepen
rsc.li/chemical-science
the understanding of the cell death mechanisms induced by these metallocompounds.
Introduction
Recently, organometallic iridium complexes have been reported to exhibit potent anticancer effects.1 On the other
hand, phosphorescent iridium complexes have been widely
investigated for bioimaging and biosensing due to their
superior photophysical properties, e.g., high quantum yields,
large Stokes shis and long emission lifetimes.2 Moreover, the
phosphorescence of iridium complexes is reported to be
sensitive to the environmental changes, such as oxygen,3
viscosity4 and pH.5 By careful structural tuning and molecular
design, iridium complexes can locate in specic cell organelles to achieve bioimaging applications at the subcellular
levels.6
MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry, School of Chemistry,
Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China. E-mail: cesmzw@mail.sysu.edu.
cn; tancaip@mail.sysu.edu.cn
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures,
scheme, gures, tables and Movie S1. CCDC 1839168–1839170. For ESI and
crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI:
10.1039/c8sc04242j
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
The uorescence lifetime of a uorophore depends on its
molecular environment but not concentration, and uorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) can reect the alterations in
microenvironments with high accuracy.7 In the FLIM technique, molecular rotors with viscosity-dependent lifetimes can
map cellular viscosity quantitatively.8,9 Most of the FLIM probes
have nanosecond lifetimes similar to cellular background
autouorescence (usually below 10 ns), which limits their
contrast and sensitivity. Owing to their high spin–orbit coupling
associated with the heavy metal ion, metal complexes are ideal
candidates for phosphorescence lifetime imaging microscopy
(PLIM) with emission lifetimes up to microseconds.10–12 The
accuracy can be increased due to the expanded linear correlation scope and totally depleted background emission by
imposing a time delay between excitation and detection.13
Moreover, two-photon phosphorescence lifetime imaging
microscopy (TPPLIM) that uses excitation by the near-infrared
(NIR) light with deep penetration depth offers the possibility
of eliminating the background uorescence effectively and
reects micro-environmental changes of the chromophore in
a quantitative manner.10–12 On the other hand, anticancer uorescent agents that can induce and monitor therapeutic effects
Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293 | 1285
View Article Online
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Chemical Science
in real-time have attracted much attention as they can avoid the
interference between drugs and probes.14 These anticancer
agents that can reect the changes in the microenvironment of
subcellular organelles are highly desirable as they can give more
insight into the mechanism investigation.15
The mitochondrion is the energy factory and a key regulator
of cell death signaling.16 Intracellular viscosity affects protein–
protein interactions in cellular membranes,17 and it has been
demonstrated to be associated with many diseases, e.g.,
atherosclerosis,18 diabetes19 and Alzheimer's disease.20 Furthermore, the viscosity in the mitochondrial matrix is closely related
to mitochondrial network organization, mitochondrial respiration, metabolite diffusion and mitochondrial metabolism.17,21,22
Recently, some uorescent molecular rotors featuring intramolecular rotational dynamics have been designed to sense
intracellular viscosity. They usually have low quantum yields due
to the internal rotation, while the uorescence recovers as the
viscosity increases and the rotation gets restricted.8,9,21–23 Quantitative measurement of viscosity can be achieved using ratiometric viscosity monitors with both viscosity-dependent and
-independent emissive bands.9,21 Moreover, viscosity probes for
specic organelles are also accomplished by introducing targeting groups.22,24
Subcellular viscosity probes with long lifetimes up to
microseconds suitable for TPPLIM remain undeveloped.
Iridium complexes containing phosphine ligands are widely
explored as catalysts25 and phosphorescent materials,26,27 while
their bioimaging or therapeutic properties are barely revealed.
In this work, we introduce rotational groups into the emissive
iridium complexes that can aggregate in mitochondria due to
their lipophilic and cationic characteristics. As these complexes
possess viscosity-sensitive two-photon absorption (TPA) properties and long emission lifetimes, we anticipate that they can
reect the changes in the subcellular microenvironments more
precisely when they are performing the anticancer functions.
Herein, six phosphorescent cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes Ir1–
Ir6 with the general formula [Ir(C–N)2(P–P)]PF6 (C–N ¼ 2-phenylpyridine (Ir1–Ir3) or 4-(2-pyridyl)benzaldehyde (Ir4–Ir6); P–P
¼ bis-(diphenylphosphino)methane (L1 in Ir1 and Ir4), bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (L2 in Ir2 and Ir5) or bis-(diphenylphosphino)ethylene (L3 in Ir3 and Ir6); Fig. 1a) were developed as mitochondria-targeting anticancer viscosity probes.
Ir1–Ir6 contain diphosphine ligands with rotatable phenyl
substitutions, and the cyclometalated ligands in Ir4–Ir6 also
contain a rotatable aldehyde group.9,28 Among them, Ir6
displays high TPA properties and competent viscosity sensitivity. We demonstrate that Ir6 can localize to mitochondria and
induce mitochondrial dysfunction leading to apoptotic cell
death. At the same time, Ir6 can monitor the changes in mitochondrial viscosity quantitatively in a real-time manner using
TPPLIM. We nd that the viscosity of dysfunctional mitochondria is signicantly increased in a heterogeneous fashion. In
conclusion, our work demonstrates the potential of phosphorescent anticancer metallocompounds in inducing and accurately revealing microenvironmental changes at the subcellular
levels.
1286 | Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293
Edge Article
(a) Chemical structures of Ir1–Ir6. (b) X-ray crystal structures of
Ir1, Ir4 and Ir6 with thermal ellipsoids set at 30% probability. The H
atoms, counterions, and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity.
Fig. 1
Results and discussion
Synthesis and characterization
Ir1–Ir3 were synthesized using literature methods27 and Ir4–Ir6
were obtained similarly (Scheme S1†). Briey, two equivalents
of the bis-diphenylphosphine ligand and the corresponding
cyclometalated Ir(III) dimer were reuxed in CH2Cl2–CH3OH for
6 h (Ir1–Ir3) or in dimethylformamide for 72 h (Ir4–Ir6), followed by anion exchange with NH4PF6, purication by column
chromatography and recrystallization. The complexes were
characterized by ESI-MS (Fig. S1–S6†), 1H NMR spectroscopy
(Fig. S7–S12†) and elemental analysis. Ir1–Ir6 were stable for at
least 3 days as measured in a mixed solvent of dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO-d6) and D2O by 1H NMR spectroscopy
(Fig. S13†). Ir1, Ir4 and Ir6 were also characterized by X-ray
crystal diffraction (Fig. 1b and Table S1†). The iridium centers
in Ir1, Ir4 and Ir6 adopt a distorted octahedral geometry with
the two nitrogen atoms of the C–N ligands being trans to each
other. The two phosphorus atoms of the P–P ligand are trans to
the carbon atoms of the C–N ligands.
In CH2Cl2, CH3CN and PBS at 298 K, Ir1–Ir6 show intense
absorption bands at 250–340 nm assigned to spin-allowed
intraligand (1IL) transitions and less intense absorption bands
at 350–480 nm assigned to a mixture of spin-allowed and spinforbidden metal-to-ligand charge transfer transitions
(1MLCT/3MLCT) (Fig. S14†).27 Upon excitation at 405 nm, Ir1–Ir3
exhibit weak luminescence with the maxima at ca. 480 nm,
which is consistent with literature reports.27 When bulky aldehyde groups are introduced into the C–N ligands, Ir4–Ir6 display
much stronger emission at ca. 550 nm and longer lifetimes (up
to 1 ms) compared with Ir1–Ir3 (ESI, Table S3†).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
Edge Article
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Viscosity-sensitive emission properties
The emission responses of Ir1–Ir6 to viscosity were measured in
mixed methanol–glycerol solvents representing different
viscosities. Ir1–Ir6 exhibit viscosity-dependent phosphorescence intensities and lifetimes (Fig. 2a–c; S15 and S16†), which
may be attributed to the rotatable aromatic rings on diphosphine ligands and aldehyde groups.9,28 The impact of viscosity
on emission properties is more pronounced for Ir4–Ir6 than
that observed for Ir1–Ir3. For example, the maximum emission
intensity of Ir6 is enhanced by ca. 6.4-fold in 90% glycerol
compared with that measured in methanol, which can be easily
observed by the naked eye (Fig. 2a and b). The lifetime of Ir6
increases from 0.54 ms to 2.17 ms as the viscosity increases from
0.55 cP (centipoise) to 259 cP. A linear correlation is obtained
between the lifetimes (log s) of Ir6 and solvent viscosity
parameters (Fig. 2c), and the linear detection range coincides
with the range of cellular viscosities reported.9,21,22,24
To elucidate the relationship between structural restriction
and viscosity-responsive emission, we measured the
temperature-dependent NMR spectra and emission (Fig. 2d–f
and S17†). Interestingly, a linear correlation is obtained
between the lifetime (log s) of Ir6 and temperature (K), which
shows that restricting molecular rotation by reducing the
temperature can increase the emission lifetime of Ir6. In NMR
spectra, three kinds of H atoms are assigned on the dppe ligand:
group i is from the C]C double bond, and groups ii and iii are
on the benzene rings (Fig. 2d). From the 1H NMR spectra
measured at different temperatures, it can be seen that the
chemical shis as well as the shape and width of the peaks
assigned to these H atoms have changed, which indicates that
the chemical environments of these H atoms are affected by
restricted rotation. Furthermore, the 1H–1H NOESY spectra
indicate that the interactions between the H atoms of group ii/
iii and group i become stronger as the temperature decreases,
which implies that the distances between these H atoms are
reduced at lower temperature. In summary, these results show
that the viscosity-dependent emission of Ir6 may partially be
attributed to the alterations in molecular congurations under
restricted environments.
In order to conrm the specicity of the emission response
of complexes towards viscosity, we also tested the inuence of
other factors on the lifetime of Ir6. The lifetime of Ir6 exhibits
small response to polarity, solvent type, glutathione and human
serum albumin (HSA), indicating its selectivity for viscosity
(Fig. S18–S20†).
The two-photon absorption (TPA) cross-sections of Ir6 were
determined using rhodamine 6G as the reference (Table S3 and
Fig. S21†).29 The maximum TPA cross-section (dmax, lex ¼
750 nm) was measured to be 444 GM, which is comparable to
the TPA cross-sections reported for other two-photon phosphorescent iridium probes.5,30–32
Cytotoxicities, cellular uptake and localization
The in vitro cytotoxicities of Ir1–Ir6 and cisplatin were evaluated
in A549 (human lung adenocarcinoma), HeLa (human cervical
carcinoma) and LO2 (human hepatic) cells aer 48 h treatment
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Chemical Science
(Table S4†). Generally, the order of in vitro antiproliferative
activity of the compounds can be considered as Ir3 > Ir1 > Ir2 >
Ir6 > Ir4 > Ir5 > cisplatin.
Due to their intrinsic emission, we can observe the cellular
uptake and localization of phosphorescent iridium complexes
by confocal microscopy, which is closely related to their anticancer mechanisms. Ir1–Ir3 with low quantum yields exhibit no
obvious cellular emission, and the green phosphorescence of
Ir4–Ir6 is mainly maintained in the cytoplasm of A549 cells aer
1 h incubation (Fig. S22†). Inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry (ICP-MS) measurement shows that Ir1–Ir6 tend to
accumulate in the mitochondria of A549 cells (Fig. 3a).
As Ir6 displays appropriate cytotoxicity and the best linear
response to viscosity, we choose it as a model compound in the
subsequent investigations.
A high colocalization is observed for Ir6 and Mito-Tracker
Deep Red (MTDR), which is consistent with the results obtained by ICP-MS. Moreover, the Pearson's colocalization coefcient obtained for Ir6 with MTDR (0.93) is much higher than
that obtained for Ir6 with Lyso-Tracker Deep Red (LTDR, 0.28),
which further conrms that Ir6 can be used for specically
imaging mitochondria (Fig. 3b).
Induction of apoptotic cell death
Cell death can occur through various pathways (e.g., apoptosis
and necrosis) that are characterized by dened morphological
alterations and biochemical hallmarks.33 The cell death modes
induced by Ir6 were rst investigated by morphological observations. Control cells exhibit normal morphology with a plump
and homogeneous nuclear staining pattern (Fig. S23†). Cells
treated with Ir6 display typical morphological apoptotic characteristics including cell shrinkage, membrane blebbing,
condensed chromatin, and brightly stained and fragmented
nuclei.34 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) also shows
that Ir6-treated cells exhibit typical apoptotic characteristics,
such as hyperchromatin and vacuolar degeneration (Fig. 3c).
From the TEM picture, we can also see that Ir6-treatment causes
abnormal mitochondrial morphology. In the untreated cells,
normal mitochondria show a normal tubular structure. In the
cells treated with Ir6, the normal shape of mitochondria
disappears and mitochondria with disrupted cristae can be
observed.
The externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer
leaet of the cells is an indication of early apoptosis.35
Annexin V staining shows a concentration-dependent increase
in the proportion of apoptotic cells in Ir6-treated cells, and
apoptotic cells increase from 4.79 0.1% to 38.0 1.4% aer
Ir6 (20 mM, 24 h) treatment (Fig. S24†). Confocal microscopic
observation also shows that aer Ir6 (5 mM, 24 h) treatment, the
proportions of cells at both early (annexin V-positive and propidium iodide (PI)-negative) and late (annexin V- and PIpositive) stages of apoptosis are increased signicantly
(Fig. S25†). Compared with the control cells, treatment of Ir6 (10
mM, 6 h) causes up to 2.4-fold increases in caspase-3/7 activity in
A549 cells (Fig. S26†). These results indicate that Ir6 induces
caspase-mediated apoptotic cell death.
Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293 | 1287
View Article Online
Edge Article
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Chemical Science
Fig. 2 (a and b) Emission intensity and (c) lifetime of Ir6 (20 mM) in mixtures of CH3OH and glycerol (percentage of glycerol ¼ 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%,
40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90%, v/v). The calculated viscosity parameters are indicated. lex ¼ 405 nm. (d) To analyze the temperaturedependent NMR spectra of Ir6, three kinds of H atoms are assigned on the dppe ligand: group (i) is from the C]C double bond, and groups (ii)
and (iii) are on the benzene rings. (e) 1H NMR spectra of Ir6 in CDCl3 at different temperatures. (f) 1H–1H NOESY spectra of Ir6 in CDCl3 at different
temperatures. The integrals of the peaks showing the interactions between (i) and (ii)/(iii) are marked in blue.
1288 | Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Edge Article
Chemical Science
Fig. 3 (a) Detection of iridium in the extracts of A549 cells treated with Ir1–Ir6 (20 mM, 1 h). (b) Cellular colocalization microscopy image of A549
cells incubated with Ir6 (20 mM, 1 h) and MTDR/LTDR (200 nM, 30 min). lex ¼ 405 nm (Ir6)/633 nm (MTDR/LTDR); lem ¼ 550 20 nm (Ir6)/665
20 nm (MTDR/LTDR). Overlay 1: overlay of the 2nd and 3rd columns. Overlay 2: overlay of the 1st and 4th columns. Scale bars: 10 mm. (c) TEM
images of A549 cells incubated with Ir6 (20 mM, 24 h). The images in the lower panel are the enlarged images from the red boxes. Scale bars:
5 mm. (d) Representative result of MMP detection by JC-1 staining and flow cytometry. A549 cells were treated with Ir6 at indicated concentrations for 4 h. lex ¼ 488 nm; lem ¼ 527 20 nm (JC-1 monomers) and 590 20 nm (JC-1 aggregates). The black and colored lines represent
the control and Ir6-treated samples, respectively. (e) Respiratory profiles of A549 cells treated with Ir6 (3 h) under basal conditions, and after the
addition of oligomycin (Oligo, 0.75 mM), trifluoromethoxy carbonylcyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP, 1.0 mM) and rotenone/antimycin A (R/A,
0.5 mM each) measured by a Seahorse XF24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer.
To further investigate the cancer cell selectivity of Ir6, we
compared the anticancer activities of Ir6 on human hepatoblastoma cells (HepG2) and LO2 cells from the same organ. A
higher cytotoxicity of Ir6 is observed in HepG2 cells than in LO2
cells at all the doses tested (Fig. S27a†). Higher iridium levels
are detected in mitochondria isolated from HepG2 cells than in
mitochondria from LO2 cells, which may explain the higher
cytotoxicity observed in HepG2 cells (Fig. S27b†). Furthermore,
an about 1.7-fold increase in caspase-3/7 activity can be detected
in HepG2 cells treated with Ir6 (10 mM) while caspase-3/7 activation is not so obvious in LO2 cells (Fig. S27c†).
Induction of mitochondrial dysfunction
As Ir6 could localize to mitochondria, we then investigated the
impact of Ir6 on mitochondrial integrity. The mitochondrial
membrane potential (MMP) can be measured by 5,50 ,6,60 -tetrachloro-1,10 -3,30 -tetraethyl-benzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide
(JC-1) staining. At high MMPs, JC-1 exists in its aggregate form
and emits red uorescence, while it exists as a monomer and
emits green uorescence at low MMPs.36 Compared with the
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
control group, a collapse in MMPs is observed in Ir6-treated
A549 cells as indicated by the decrease in the ratio of red/green
uorescence of JC-1 (Fig. 3d and S28†). Compared with the
control group, Ir6-treated cells show a signicant decrease in
ATP levels as measured by the CellTiter-Glo® luminescent cell
viability assay (Fig. S29†). Subsequently, we used the Seahorse
XF24 extracellular ux analyzer to measure the oxygen
consumption rate (OCR) which is indicative of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) status.37 Compared
with the control cells, Ir6-treated cells display a decrease in
basal respiration, ATP production and non-mitochondrial
respiration, along with an increase in proton leak (Fig. 3e and
S30†). These results indicate that Ir6-treatment can impair the
energetic and metabolic status of mitochondria. Mitochondria
are the main sites where cellular oxidative stress is produced,
and defects in mitochondrial functionality oen lead to the
elevation of the level of ROS.38
The ROS levels were evaluated using the 20 ,70 -dichlorodihydrouorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) assay. DCFH-DA is nonuorescent but can be oxidized to the highly uorescent 20 ,70 -
Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293 | 1289
View Article Online
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Chemical Science
dichlorouorescein (DCF) in the presence of ROS. An obvious
concentration-dependent increase in uorescence intensity of
DCF can be detected in Ir6-treated cells (Fig. S31†). Compared
with the control cells, a ca. 34.9-fold increase in the mean
uorescence intensity (MFI) of DCF is observed in A549 cells
treated with Ir6 (20 mM, 6 h). Moreover, the uorescence of DCF
colocalizes well with that of the mitochondria-specic dye
MTDR, which indicates that ROS are mainly generated in
mitochondria (Fig. S32†). These results collectively indicate that
Ir6 can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and a massive
production of ROS.
Tracking of mitochondrial viscosity via TPPLIM
As previous experiments show, Ir6 can cause mitochondrial
dysfunction, and a linear response relationship exists between
its lifetime and environmental viscosity. We then use TPPLIM to
track the dynamic changes in mitochondrial viscosity and
investigate its correlation with mitochondrial physiological
status. A time-dependent increase in the integrated phosphorescence lifetime is observed in Ir6-treated A549 cells in 4 h
(Fig. 4a). As Ir6 can image mitochondrial viscosity, it can be
Edge Article
applied to track the changes in mitochondrial viscosity in real
time.
The average lifetime increases from about 1410 ns to 1792 ns
and the viscosity of mitochondria is calculated to be varying
from about 35 cP to 100 cP, which is consistent with the
viscosity parameters reported in the literature.22 Under the same
conditions, the collapse in MMP in Ir6-treated A549 cells is also
detected with JC-1 staining. The uorescence ratio (green/red) is
calculated to increase from 0.45 to 0.95, indicating the loss of
MMP (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, with the extension of incubation
time, the decrease in the red/green uorescence ratios of JC-1
and the increase in the calculated viscosity value show the
same trend, which indicates that the changes in viscosity
parameters can reect the mitochondrial physiological status
(Fig. 4d). The emission intensity and lifetime of Ir6 in A549 cells
were also recorded by confocal microscopy in a real-time
manner. As the incubation time increases, an obvious
increase in the emission intensity and lifetime of Ir6 can be
observed (Movie S1†).
It is known that the responses of different mitochondria in
a cell to external stimuli are different, but the detection
methods for mitochondrial heterogeneity are limited.39,40 We
Fig. 4 (a) Mitochondrial viscosity in Ir6-treated A549 cells detected by TPPLIM. The cells were treated with Ir6 (20 mM) and subjected to imaging
at different time intervals. (b) Determination of mitochondrial heterogeneity. A549 cells were treated with Ir6 (20 mM) for 4 h. The enlarged
images are from the red boxes. The lifetime and viscosity are calculated from the spots in the red circle. lex ¼ 750 nm (Ir6); lem ¼ 550 20 nm
(Ir6). (c). Confocal microscopy image of JC-1 in Ir6-treated A549 cells. lex ¼ 488 nm; lem ¼ 530 20 nm (JC-1 monomers)/590 20 nm (JC-1
aggregates). (d) Calculated lifetimes of Ir6 and fluorescence ratio of JC-1 (green)/J-aggregates (red). Scale bars: 10 mm (a and c)/5 mm (b).
1290 | Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Edge Article
integrated the emission lifetimes of different spots in the cell
and calculated the corresponding viscosity values. It can be seen
that the lifetimes of different spots vary from 1618 ns to 1966 ns
and the corresponding viscosity values range from ca. 63 cP to
ca. 144 cP (Fig. 4b). The results show that TPPLIM can provide
a relatively accurate quantitative method to detect mitochondrial heterogeneity.
In vivo imaging of zebrash
Two-photon excitation imaging is attractive for in vivo applications due to the penetrability of the long wavelength photo
source. Thus, we investigated the in vivo imaging capability of
Ir6 using zebrash larvae. Ir6 can effectively image zebrash
under both one- and two-photon excitation (Fig. S33†). Besides,
the phosphorescence lifetimes reveal varied viscosities in
different tissues of zebrash larvae (Fig. S34†). The surface of
the eyes and torso exhibits a shorter lifetime (ca. 500 ns). The
interior of the eyes, head and spine shows a longer lifetime (ca.
1300 ns). The result demonstrates that Ir6 has potential for
application in TPPLIM in vivo.
Conclusions
In this work, we designed six cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes
containing diphosphine ligands as mitochondria-targeting
anticancer agents. Among them, the lifetime of the Ir6
complex exhibits a specic response to the environmental
viscosity and Ir6 has potent TPA properties. Ir6 can effectively
accumulate in mitochondria and specically label mitochondria. Moreover, Ir6 can induce apoptosis mediated by caspase
activation. As expected, Ir6 can impair the energetic/metabolic
status of mitochondria and cause massive production of mitochondrial ROS. Owing to its viscosity-responsive phosphorescence lifetimes, Ir6 is capable of monitoring the changes in
mitochondrial viscosity using TPPLIM in real-time. At the same
time, the heterogeneity of mitochondria can be detected during
the process of damage using TPPLIM. In conclusion, our work
provides a new clue for the design of small molecule-based
anticancer agents that can induce and monitor therapeutic
effects by quantitative detection of microenvironmental
changes at the subcellular level.
Experimental section
Synthetic protocol and characterization
[Ir2(ppy)4Cl2] and [Ir2(ppy-CHO)4Cl2]. These compounds
were synthesized using literature methods.41 Briey, IrCl3$3H2O
(1.00 g, 2.84 mmol) and ppy (0.967 g, 6.25 mmol) or ppy-CHO
(1.145 g, 6.25 mmol) were reuxed in 2-ethoxyethanol
(100 mL) for 18 h. Aer cooling to room temperature and
ltration, the residue was washed with methanol and ether.
[Ir2(ppy)4Cl2] and [Ir2(ppy-CHO)4Cl2] were obtained as yellow
and orange solids, respectively.
[Ir(ppy)2L1](PF6) (Ir1). Ir1 was synthesized by reacting
[Ir2(ppy)4Cl2] (0.200 g, 0.186 mmol) with L1 (0.157 g,
0.410 mmol) according to literature methods.27 Yield: 0.299 g
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Chemical Science
(78%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) d 8.11–8.02 (m, 4H; H1, 5,
16, 20), 7.89 (d, J ¼ 7.7 Hz, 2H; H28, 29), 7.74 (dd, J ¼ 15.3,
7.6 Hz, 6H; H24, 17–19), 7.57 (t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, 6H; H7–9, 12–14),
7.13 (t, J ¼ 7.3 Hz, 2H; H26, 31), 7.06 (t, J ¼ 7.4 Hz, 2H; H23, 34),
6.98 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 6H; H21, 25, 32, 36, 24, 33), 6.87 (t, J ¼ 8.5 Hz,
4H; H6, 10, 11, 15), 6.62 (t, J ¼ 6.6 Hz, 2H; H22, 35), 6.30 (d, J ¼
5.0 Hz, 2H; H27, 30), 5.94 (t, J ¼ 9.9 Hz, 2H; H37). ESI-MS
(CH3OH): m/z calcd for [M PF6]+, 885.22; found: 885.3.
Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C47H38IrN2P3F6$H2O: C, 53.87;
H, 3.85; N, 2.67; found: C, 53.93; H, 3.78; N, 2.63.
[Ir(ppy)2L2](PF6) (Ir2). Ir2 was synthesized by reacting
[Ir2(ppy)4Cl2] (0.200 g, 0.186 mmol) with L2 (0.163 g, 0.410
mmol) according to literature methods.27 Yield: 0.249 g (64%).
1
H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) d 7.94 (d, J ¼ 8.2 Hz, 2H; H1, 20),
7.85 (d, J ¼ 7.7 Hz, 2H; H5, 16), 7.73 (dd, J ¼ 15.6, 7.0 Hz, 6H;
H2–4, 17–19), 7.64 (t, J ¼ 7.7 Hz, 2H; H28, 29), 7.47 (t, J ¼ 7.3 Hz,
2H; H8, 13), 7.36 (t, J ¼ 7.3 Hz, 4H; H7, 9, 12, 14), 7.05 (t, J ¼
7.4 Hz, 4H; H23, 26, 31, 34), 6.96 (t, J ¼ 7.3 Hz, 2H; H24, 33), 6.90
(t, J ¼ 7.4 Hz, 4H; H21, 25, 32, 36), 6.64 (t, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 4H; H6, 10,
11, 15), 6.47 (t, J ¼ 6.6 Hz, 2H; H22, 35), 6.22 (d, J ¼ 4.6 Hz, 2H;
H27, 30), 3.92 (dt, J ¼ 23.3, 12.6 Hz, 2H; H37, 38), 2.92 (d, J ¼
9.3 Hz, 2H; H37, 38). ESI-MS (CH3OH): m/z calcd for [M PF6]+,
899.23; found: 899.3. Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C48H40IrN2P3F6: C, 55.22; H, 3.86; N, 2.68; found: C, 54.97; H, 3.79; N,
2.59.
[Ir(ppy)2L3](PF6) (Ir3). Ir3 was synthesized by reacting
[Ir2(ppy)4Cl2] (0.200 g, 0.186 mmol) with L3 (0.162 g, 0.410
mmol) according to literature methods.27 Yield: 0.279 g (72%).
1
H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) d 8.97–8.76 (m, 2H; H37, 38), 7.85
(dd, J ¼ 16.3, 8.2 Hz, 6H; H1, 5, 16, 20), 7.78 (d, J ¼ 7.7 Hz, 2H;
H3, 18), 7.59 (dd, J ¼ 12.9, 7.1 Hz, 4H; H4, 28, 29, 17), 7.50 (t, J ¼
7.3 Hz, 4H; H7, 9, 12, 14), 7.42 (d, J ¼ 5.8 Hz, 2H; H8, 13), 7.07
(dd, J ¼ 13.3, 6.9 Hz, 4H; H23, 26, 31, 34), 6.99 (t, J ¼ 7.3 Hz, 2H;
H24, 33), 6.90 (t, J ¼ 7.1 Hz, 4H; H21, 25, 32, 36), 6.64–6.29 (m,
6H; H6, 10, 11, 15, 2, 19), 6.20 (dd, J ¼ 7.1, 2.1 Hz, 2H; H27, 30).
ESI-MS (CH3OH): m/z calcd for [M PF6]+, 897.22; found: 897.3.
Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C48H38IrN2P3F6: C, 55.33; H,
3.68, N, 2.68; found: C, 54.96; H, 3.62; N, 2.64.
[Ir(ppy-CHO)2L1](PF6) (Ir4). [Ir2(ppy-CHO)4Cl2] (0.200 g,
0.168 mmol) and L1 (0.143 g, 0.372 mmol) were reuxed in
dimethyl formamide for 72 h. Aer cooling to room temperature, the solution was evaporated to 5 mL under reduced pressure before being instilled into saturated aqueous solution of
NH4PF6. The resulting turbid liquid was ltered to obtain light
yellow solids. The crude product was puried by column chromatography on silica gel (CH2Cl2 : CH3OH ¼ 99 : 1, v/v) and
recrystallized by diffusion of diethyl ether into acetonitrile. The
nal product was obtained as yellow crystals. Yield: 0.274 g
(75%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) d 9.74 (s, 2H; H27, 30), 8.24
(d, J ¼ 8.1 Hz, 2H; H28, 29), 8.15 (dd, J ¼ 9.1, 7.5 Hz, 4H; H1, 5,
16, 20), 7.89 (t, J ¼ 7.7 Hz, 2H; H3, 18), 7.70 (t, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 4H; H2,
4, 11, 19), 7.65–7.50 (m, 8H; H7–9, 12–14, 26, 31), 7.15 (t, J ¼
7.3 Hz, 2H), 6.99 (t, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, 4H), 6.84 (dt, J ¼ 13.5, 7.9 Hz,
6H), 6.77 (d, J ¼ 2.5 Hz, 2H), 6.05 (t, J ¼ 10.1 Hz, 2H). ESI-MS
(CH3OH): m/z calcd for [M PF6]+, 941.20; [M PF6 +
CH3OH]+, 973.23; [M PF6 + 2CH3OH]+, 1005.26; found: 941.3,
Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293 | 1291
View Article Online
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Chemical Science
973.3, 1005.3. Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C49H38IrN2O2P3F6: C, 53.73; H, 3.53; N, 2.58; found: C, 53.96; H, 3.50; N, 2.51.
[Ir(ppy-CHO)2L2](PF6) (Ir5). Ir5 was synthesized adopting
a similar procedure to that described for Ir4 by using L2 instead
of L1 as the ligand. Yield: 0.225 g (61%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6DMSO) d 9.74 (s, 2H; H27, 30), 8.17–8.07 (m, 4H; H1, 5, 16, 20),
7.80 (dd, J ¼ 13.6, 6.6 Hz, 4H; H3, 18, 26, 31), 7.68 (t, J ¼ 8.6 Hz,
4H; H2, 4, 17, 19), 7.58 (d, J ¼ 7.9 Hz, 2H; H28, 29), 7.46 (t, J ¼
7.4 Hz, 2H; H7, 13), 7.31 (t, J ¼ 7.1 Hz, 4H; H6, 8, 12, 14), 7.07 (t, J
¼ 7.3 Hz, 2H; H23, 34), 6.91 (t, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, 4H; H21, 25, 32, 36),
6.72 (d, J ¼ 2.8 Hz, 2H; 24, 33), 6.69–6.56 (m, 6H; H6, 10, 11, 15,
22, 35), 3.98 (dd, J ¼ 30.1, 10.1 Hz, 2H; H37, 38), 3.02 (d, J ¼
9.2 Hz, 2H; H37, 38). ESI-MS (CH3OH): m/z calcd for [M PF6]+,
955.22; [M PF6 + CH3OH]+, 987.25; [M PF6 + 2CH3OH]+,
1019.27; found: 955.3, 987.3, 1019.3. Elemental analysis calcd
(%) for C50H40IrN2O2P3F6$3H2O: C, 54.59; H, 3.67; N, 2.55;
found: C, 54.37; H, 3.93; N, 2.46.
[Ir(ppy-CHO)2L3](PF6) (Ir6). Ir6 was synthesized adopting
a similar procedure to that described for Ir4 by using L3 instead
of L1 as the ligand. Yield: 0.247 g (67%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6DMSO) d 9.75 (s, 2H; H27, 30), 8.98–8.82 (m, 2H; H37, 38), 8.03
(t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, 4H; H1, 5, 16, 20), 7.78 (dt, J ¼ 15.5, 8.1 Hz, 6H;
H2–4, 17–19), 7.59 (t, J ¼ 8.2 Hz, 4H; H26, 28, 29, 31), 7.48 (dd, J
¼ 10.6, 5.8 Hz, 6H; H7–9, 12–14), 7.11 (t, J ¼ 7.4 Hz, 2H; H23,
34), 6.92 (t, J ¼ 7.1 Hz, 4H; H21, 25, 32, 36), 6.70–6.60 (m, 4H;
H22, 24, 33, 35), 6.48 (t, J ¼ 8.6 Hz, 4H; H6, 10, 11, 15). ESI-MS
(CH3OH): m/z calcd for [M PF6]+, 953.20; [M PF6 + CH3OH]+,
985.23; [M PF6 + 2CH3OH]+, 1017.26; found: 953.3, 985.3,
1017.4. Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C50H38IrN2O2P3F6: C,
54.70; H, 3.49; N, 2.55; found: C, 54.26; H, 3.38; N, 2.47.
Real-time tracking of mitochondria by TPPLIM
A549 cells were seeded in 35 mm culture dishes (Corning) and
incubated for 24 h. The growth medium was replaced by PBS
with Ir6 (20 mM) and DMSO (1%, v/v) before visualization by
confocal microscopy. The confocal microscope is connected to
an incubator that provides a constant temperature (37 C) and
CO2 (5%). The luminescence intensity and phosphorescence
lifetime of Ir6 under two-photon excitation were collected,
respectively. The phosphorescence lifetime value is given by
Becker & Hickl SPCImage. lex ¼ 750 nm (TPM); lem ¼ 550
20 nm.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conict of interest.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (21778078, 21571196, 21572282 and
21837006), the 973 program (2015CB856301), the Guangdong
Natural Science Foundation (2015A030306023), Innovative
Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China
(IRT_17R111) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the
Central Universities.
1292 | Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293
Edge Article
Notes and references
1 Z. Liu, I. Romero-Canelón, B. Qamar, J. M. Hearn,
A. Habtemariam, N. P. E. Barry, A. M. Pizarro, G. J. Clarkson
and P. J. Sadler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 3941–3946.
2 L. C.-C. Lee, J. C.-W. Lau, H.-W. Liu and K. K.-W. Lo, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 1046–1049.
3 S. Zhang, M. Hosaka, T. Yoshihara, K. Negishi, Y. Iida,
S. Tobita and T. Takeuchi, Cancer Res., 2010, 70, 4490.
4 F. Liu, J. Wen, S.-S. Chen and S. Sun, Chem. Commun., 2018,
54, 1371–1374.
5 L. He, C.-P. Tan, R.-R. Ye, Y.-Z. Zhao, Y.-H. Liu, Q. Zhao,
L.-N. Ji and Z.-W. Mao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53,
12137–12141.
6 K. Qiu, Y. Chen, T. W. Rees, L. Ji and H. Chao, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 2019, 378, 66–86.
7 M. Y. Berezin and S. Achilefu, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 2641–
2684.
8 M. K. Kuimova, G. Yahioglu, J. A. Levitt and K. Suhling, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6672–6673.
9 X. Peng, Z. Yang, J. Wang, J. Fan, Y. He, F. Song, B. Wang,
S. Sun, J. Qu, J. Qi and M. Yan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,
133, 6626–6635.
10 J. Wang, J. Xue, Z. Yan, S. Zhang, J. Qiao and X. Zhang,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 14928–14932.
11 E. Baggaley, M. R. Gill, N. H. Green, D. Turton,
I. V. Sazanovich, S. W. Botchway, C. Smythe,
J. W. Haycock, J. A. Weinstein and J. A. Thomas, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 3367–3371.
12 K. Y. Zhang, Q. Yu, H. Wei, S. Liu, Q. Zhao and W. Huang,
Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 1770–1839.
13 S. Liu, H. Liang, K. Y. Zhang, Q. Zhao, X. Zhou, W. Xu and
W. Huang, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 7943–7946.
14 R. Kumar, W. S. Shin, K. Sunwoo, W. Y. Kim, S. Koo,
S. Bhuniya and J. S. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 6670–
6683.
15 R. Kumar, J. Han, H.-J. Lim, W. X. Ren, J.-Y. Lim, J.-H. Kim
and J. S. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 17836–17843.
16 S. W. G. Tait and D. R. Green, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2010,
11, 621–632.
17 S. J. Singer and G. L. Nicolson, Science, 1972, 175, 720–731.
18 G. Deliconstantinos, V. Villiotou and J. C. Stavrides, Biochem.
Pharmacol., 1995, 49, 1589–1600.
19 O. Nadiv, M. Shinitzky, H. Manu, D. Hecht, C. T. Roberts,
D. Leroith and Y. Zick, Biochem. J., 1994, 298(2), 443–450.
20 G. S. Zubenko, U. Kopp, T. Seto and L. L. Firestone,
Psychopharmacology, 1999, 145, 175–180.
21 F. Liu, T. Wu, J. Cao, S. Cui, Z. Yang, X. Qiang, S. Sun,
F. Song, J. Fan, J. Wang and X. Peng, Chem.–Eur. J., 2013,
19, 1548–1553.
22 Z. Yang, Y. He, J.-H. Lee, N. Park, M. Suh, W.-S. Chae, J. Cao,
X. Peng, H. Jung, C. Kang and J. S. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2013, 135, 9181–9185.
23 M. K. Kuimova, S. W. Botchway, A. W. Parker, M. Balaz,
H. A. Collins, H. L. Anderson, K. Suhling and P. R. Ogilby,
Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 69–73.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
Open Access Article. Published on 04 December 2018. Downloaded on 5/2/2026 2:47:42 AM.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Edge Article
24 L. Wang, Y. Xiao, W. Tian and L. Deng, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2013, 135, 2903–2906.
25 T. Hayashi, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 354–362.
26 S.-X. Luo, L. Wei, X.-H. Zhang, M. H. Lim, K. X. V. Lin,
M. H. V. Yeo, W.-H. Zhang, Z.-P. Liu, D. J. Young and
T. S. A. Hor, Organometallics, 2013, 32, 2908–2917.
27 D. Rota Martir, A. K. Bansal, V. Di Mascio, D. B. Cordes,
A. F. Henwood, A. M. Z. Slawin, P. C. J. Kamer,
L. Martı́nez-Sarti, A. Pertegás, H. J. Bolink, I. D. W. Samuel
and E. Zysman-Colman, Inorg. Chem. Front., 2016, 3, 218–
235.
28 H. Zhu, J. Fan, M. Li, J. Cao, J. Wang and X. Peng, Chem.–Eur.
J., 2014, 20, 4691–4696.
29 N. S. Makarov, M. Drobizhev and A. Rebane, Opt. Express,
2008, 16, 4029–4047.
30 J. Massue, J. Olesiak-Banska, E. Jeanneau, C. Aronica,
K. Matczyszyn, M. Samoc, C. Monnereau and C. Andraud,
Inorg. Chem., 2013, 52, 10705–10707.
31 W.-J. Xu, S.-J. Liu, X. Zhao, N. Zhao, Z.-Q. Liu, H. Xu,
H. Liang, Q. Zhao, X.-Q. Yu and W. Huang, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2013, 19, 621–629.
32 C. L. Ho, K. L. Wong, H. K. Kong, Y. M. Ho, C. T. L. Chan,
W. M. Kwok, K. S. Y. Leung, H. L. Tam, M. H. W. Lam,
X. F. Ren, A. M. Ren, J. K. Feng and W. Y. Wong, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 2525–2527.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Chemical Science
33 G. Kroemer, L. Galluzzi, P. Vandenabeele, J. Abrams,
E. S. Alnemri, E. H. Baehrecke, M. V. Blagosklonny,
W. S. El-Deiry, P. Golstein, D. R. Green, M. Hengartner,
R. A. Knight, S. Kumar, S. A. Lipton, W. Malorni, G. Nuñez,
M. E. Peter, J. Tschopp, J. Yuan, M. Piacentini,
B. Zhivotovsky and G. Melino, Cell Death Differ., 2008, 16, 3.
34 R. C. Taylor, S. P. Cullen and S. J. Martin, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell
Biol., 2008, 9, 231–241.
35 R. S. Hotchkiss, A. Strasser, J. E. Mcdunn and P. E. Swanson,
N. Engl. J. Med., 2009, 361, 1570–1583.
36 S. T. Smiley, M. Reers, C. Mottola-Hartshorn, M. Lin,
A. Chen, T. W. Smith, G. D. Steele and L. B. Chen, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1991, 88, 3671–3675.
37 M. B. De Moura and B. Van Houten, Methods Mol. Biol., 2014,
1105, 589–602.
38 S. S. Sabharwal and P. T. Schumacker, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2014,
14, 709–721.
39 A. V. Kuznetsov, J. Troppmair, R. Sucher, M. Hermann,
V. Saks and R. Margreiter, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2006,
1757, 686–691.
40 S. Salvioli, J. Dobrucki, L. Moretti, L. Troiano,
M. G. Fernandez, M. Pinti, J. Pedrazzi, C. Franceschi and
A. Cossarizza, Cytometry, 2000, 40, 189–197.
41 C. Li, M. Yu, Y. Sun, Y. Wu, C. Huang and F. Li, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2011, 133, 11231–11239.
Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 1285–1293 | 1293