← Back
Mitochondria-localising DNA-binding biscyclometalated phenyltriazole iridium(iii) dipyridophenazene complexes: syntheses and cellular imaging properties.
eprints@whiterose.ac.uk
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk
Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York
Deposited via The University of Sheffield.
White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/130880/
Version: Accepted Version
Article:
Sreedharan, S., Sinopoli, A., Jarman, P.J. et al. (2018) Mitochondria-localising DNAbinding biscyclometalated phenyltriazole iridium(III) dipyridophenazene complexes:
syntheses and cellular imaging properties. Dalton Transactions, 47 (14). pp. 4931-4940.
ISSN: 1477-9226
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8dt00046h
Reuse
Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless
indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by
national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of
the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record
for the item.
Takedown
If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by
emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
Received 00th January 20xx,
Accepted 00th January 20xx
DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
www.rsc.org/
Mitochondria-localizing DNA binding biscyclometalated
phenyltriazole iridium(III) dipyridophenazene complexes:
syntheses and cellular imaging properties
a,b
c
d
d
Sreejesh Sreedharan, † Alessandro Sinopoli, † Paul. J. Jarman, Darren Robinson, Christopher
a
a
a
d
c
Clemmet, Paul A. Scattergood, Craig R. Rice, Carl. G. W. Smythe, James A. Thomas * and Paul
a
I.P. Elliott *
R
+
R
Two new biscyclometalated complexes [Ir(ptz )2(dppz)] (dppz = dipyridophenazene; ptz H = 4-phenyl-1-benzyl-1,2,3+
+
triazole (1 ) and 4-phenyl-1-propyl-1,2,3-triazole (2 )) have been prepared. The hexafluorophosphate salts of these
complexes have been fully characterized and, in one case, the X-ray structure of a nitrate salt was obtained. The DNA
binding properties of the chloride salts of the complexes were investigated, as well as their cellular uptake by A2780 and
MCF7 cell lines. Both complexes display an increase in phosphorescent emission on titration with duplex DNA, indicating
the intercalation of the dppz ligand and, given that they are monocations, the complexes exhibit appreciable DNA binding
affinity. Optical microscopy studies reveal that both complexes are taken up by live cancer cell lines displaying cytosol
based luminescence. Colocalization studies with commercial probes show high Pearson coefficients with mitotracker dyes
confirming that the new complexes specifically localize on mitochondria.
2+
Introduction
6
Phosphorescent complexes of kinetically inert d metals such
as rhenium(I), ruthenium(II) and iridium(III) have become
increasingly attractive for the development of novel
1-7
luminescent cellular imaging agents for confocal microscopy.
Luminescent complexes of this type offer several advantages
over purely organic luminophores; the ability to readily access
phosphorescent triplet states results in longer lifetimes of
emission, enabling their use in time-gated imaging applications
which removes unwanted background autofluorescence
8, 9
deriving from biological materials. Further, the structures of
the ligands in these complexes can be readily modified to; tune
the photophysical properties, augment the balance between
lipophilicity and hydrophilicity to maximize cellular uptake, and
2
can be derivatised to facilitate organelle targeting.
One the most studied examples of emissive transition
metal complexes in this area is the DNA “light switch”,
[Ru(N^N)2(dppz)]
(N^N = 2,2’-bipyridyl, phenanthroline,
10-12
Chart 1).
When this complex interacts with DNA, the
extended planar dppz ligand intercalates between base pairs
of the duplex. A consequence of this interaction is that water
molecules are excluded from hydrogen bonding with N-donor
3
sites of dppz, “switching on” the Ru→dppz-based MLCT
emission of the complex.
Iridium complexes have also been actively targeting for
13-17
their use in biological imaging and diagnostics,
and imaging
probes for specific organelles, including mitochondria have
18-26
been devloped.
Biscyclometalated iridium(III) complexes
27-33
bearing dppz-like ligands have also been investigated.
Although these systems often display lower DNA binding
II
constants compared to their dicationic Ru analogues due to
the reduced electrostatic attraction between the monocationic
complex and the anionic phosphates of the DNA polymer
backbone, the increased stability of iridium(III) complexes to
ligand-loss and the high degree of stereochemical control of
the coordination environment in these complexes offers some
significant advantages in the development of DNA-targeting
systems. Furthermore, given that cellular uptake is often
closely related to increased hydrophobicity, the lower charge
of such species may actually be advantageous for cell imaging
applications. With this in mind, we pursued the synthesis and
characterization of two new complexes, each bearing a dppz
intercalating
ligand
along
with
phenyltriazole-based
cyclometated ligands (Chart 1).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 1
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
ARTICLE
Journal Name
2+
Chart 1. Structures of DNA “light switch” complex [Ru(bpy)(dppz)]
(left) and the
R
+
prototypical iridium(III) intercalator complex [Ir(ptz )2(dppz)] reported here
(right).
Triazole-based compounds have become popular ligand
34-36
motifs in coordination chemistry and photophysics.
Since
stereoselectivity in synthesis would place the triazole rings
trans to one another and cis to the dppz ligand, we anticipated
that the N2 atoms of these rings would point towards the DNA
upon intercalation. We reasoned that this might lead to
stabilization of a resultant DNA adduct through additional Hbonding interactions with sugar O-H or base N-H protons.
Axially positioned triazole substituents could also potentially
provide additional H-bonding or π-stacking moieties.
Consequently, to investigate these possibilities, our two
prototype complexes either include benzyl substituents as
potential additional intercalating groups, or simple propyl
chains where such interactions are not possible.
In this paper we present our preliminary results on the
synthesis and characterization of these complexes as well as
the investigation of their DNA binding properties and cellular
uptake, localisation and luminescent imaging studies.
Results and Discussion
Scheme 1. Synthetic route to complexes 1.PF6 and 2.PF6.
Several unsuccessful attempts were made to obtain X-ray
diffraction
quality
crystals
of
the
complexes
as
hexafluorophosphate salts. However, suitable crystals were
+
obtained
for
1
as
its
nitrate
salt
Bn
[Ir(ptz )2(dppz)][NO3].2.5CH2Cl2.
from
dichloromethane
+
layered with hexane. The structure of the cation 1 is shown in
Figure 1. The complex crystallised in the space group P21/n
with two cations per unit cell. The cation adopts the expected
distorted
octahedral
geometry
for
a
heteroleptic
biscyclometalated iridium(III) complex in which the two
triazole N-donors are situated mutually trans to one another
with the aryl rings in a cis arrangement. The metal-ligand bond
lengths in the complex are unremarkable with Ir-N distances
varying from 2.000(5) to 2.145(4) Å, with those for the
cyclometalated ligand being slightly shorter than those to
dppz. The bite angles of the cyclometalating ligands are 79.3(2)
and 79.6(2) ° with that for the dppz ligand being slightly
narrower at 77.23(18) °.
Synthesis and characterisation.
+
+
The biscyclometalated complexes 1 and 2 were prepared
using the two-step procedure shown in Scheme 1. Iridium(III)
chloride and the corresponding 4-phenyl-1,2,3-triazole ligand
precursor were combined in ethoxyethanol/water (3:1),
heated to reflux for twelve hours, and then allowed to cool to
room temperature. The crude dimers were then reacted with
the dppz in refluxing dichloromethane/methanol and the
product was purified by column chromatography using
acetonitrile/saturated aqueous KNO3 and ultimately isolated
as their hexafluorophosphate salts.
+
+
1
Complexes 1 and 2 have been fully characterised using H
13
1
and C NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. The H
+
+
NMR spectra of 1 and 2 exhibit a single set of resonances for
the cyclometalated ligands along with five resonances for the
dppz ligand as consequence of the C2 symmetry of the
+
+
complexes. The resonances for the triazole rings of 1 and 2
appear at δ 8.15 and 8.40 respectively and are deshielded by
approximately 0.5 to 0.6 ppm relative to their phenyltriazole
ligand precursors.
+
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction structure of the cation of 1 (counterion, solvent
molecules and hydrogen atoms removed for clarity. Ellipsoids at 50 %
probability). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Ir1-N1 2.023(5); Ir1-N2
2.145(4); Ir1-N3 2.137(5); Ir1-N4 2.000(5); Ir1 C1 2.049(6); Ir1 C2 2.029(6); N1Ir1-C2 79.3(2); N4-Ir1-C1 79.6(2); N3-Ir1-N2 77.23(18); N4-Ir1-N1 170.0(2); C2Ir1-N3 173.2(2); C1-Ir1-N2 173.5(2).
2 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
Table 1. Photophysical properties of complexes as their chloride salts.
Complex
a
1
+
2
+
abs
a
λ / nm
442 (1100), 385
(8500), 364 (10100),
276 (54660)
442 (1125), 385
(7200), 365 (8180),
276 (42300)
λ
em
/ nm
672
a,b
675
a,b
τ / ns
τ1 = 23 (12 %)
τ2 = 57 (78 %)
τ3 = 268 (10 %)
τ1 = 40 (56 %)
τ2 = 101 (22 %)
τ3 = 335 (22 %)
a,c
τ / ns
τ1 = 43 (27 %)
τ2 = 92 (42 %)
τ3 = 1118 (31 %)
τ1 = 57 (9 %)
τ2 = 275 (14 %)
τ3 = 1117 (77 %)
b,d
c,d
φ/%
0.12
φ/%
0.21
0.08
0.43
recorded in acetonitrile. b aerated solutions at RT, c daerated solutions at RT, d φp for [Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2] 0.018 (air).
+
+
Figure 2 Absorption spectra of 1 and 2 complexes as their chloride salts in
acetonitrile.
Figure 3 Emission spectra of complexes 1 and 2 as their chloride salts in
acetonitrile.
In order to improve aqueous solubility for subsequent
biological studies the hexafluorophosphate salts 1.PF6 and
2.PF6 were subject to anion metathesis to yield their chloride
salts 1.Cl and 2.Cl.
UV-Visible absorption spectra of both complexes were
recorded as their chloride salts in aerated acetonitrile
solutions at room temperature (Figure 2). Both the compounds
show intense bands in the ultraviolet region at 280 nm
1
attributed to spin-allowed π-π* ligand-centred ( LC)
transitions. This assignment was made on assessment of
37
closely related metal complexes in the literature. The less
intense, lower energy absorption features from 300 to 420 nm
1
are due to MLCT/LLCT charge-transfer (CT) transition.
However, these are coincident with further absorption bands
1
of the dppz ligand and will thus have additional LC
contributions in this region. Absorptions of much weaker
intensity between 400 and 500 nm are assigned as arising from
3
38
transitions having spin-forbidden MLCT character. Due to
the minimal effect of the triazole N1 substituents on the
+
+
photophysical properties of 1 and 2 the absorption spectra of
the two complexes are nearly identical in the visible region.
Both complexes are emissive in acetonitrile solutions at
room temperature (Table 1 and Figure 3). In air emission
spectra exhibit broad featureless bands indicative of a
3
3
MLCT/ LLCT state. The emission maxima for both complexes
are around 672-675 nm again showing the photophysics to be
independent of the triazole substituent. Analysis of the
luminescent lifetimes reveals three component processes with
the longest component reaching 268 and 335 ns timescales for
+
+
1 and 2 respectively.
Preliminary emissions spectra on the hexaflourophosphate
salts resulted in emission maxima at 632 nm (ESI), significantly
blue-shifted relative to the acetonitrile spectra. This blue shift
3
on increasing solvent polarity confirms the large MLCT
character for the dominant feature in these spectra.
On degassing of acetonitrile solutions of the chloride salts
the lifetimes are elongated with the longest component on the
order of a microsecond and the quantum yields increase to
+
+
0.21 % and 0.43 % for 1 and 2 respectively. These are
relatively low quantum yields for emission and in some cases
incorporation of triazole donors has been observed to lead to
reduced emission intensity, possibly through increased solvent
34-36
interactions.
What is noticeable is that under degassed
condition the emission spectra exhibit features that indicate
some structured emission in underlying the broad largely
featureless band observed in air. This is suggestive of
3
additional emission with significant LC character and may
account for the multicomponent lifetime. The long lifetimes
accompanying the relatively low quantum yields in these
complexes may derive from long-lived dark states state which
are non-emissive but with which the observed emissive states
may be in equilibrium. Very similar effects have been observed
I
before in Re (dppz) complexes (REFS: H. D. Stoeffler, N. B.
Thornton, S. L. Temkin and K. S. Schanze, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1995, 117, 7119–7128; J. Dyer, W. J. Blau, C. G. Coates, C. M.
Creely, J. D. Gavey, M. W. George, D. C. Grills, S. Hudson, J. M.
Kelly, P. Matousek, J. J. McGarvey, J. McMaster, A. W. Parker,
M. Towrie and J. A. Weinstein, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.,
2003, 2, 542). As emission from both complexes is significantly
+
+
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
ARTICLE
Journal Name
quenched in aqueous solution, reliable quantum yields could
not be obtained.
Computational modelling of the complexes was achieved
through optimisation of the geometry of the cation using
density functional theory (DFT) calculations. As the triazole N1substituent has little effect on the photophysical properties
+
+
the analogue of 1 and 2 bearing simple methyl substituents
was investigated. Calculations at the optimised ground state
geometry reveal that the highest occupied molecular orbital
(HOMO, Figure 4) exhibits the expected localisation at the
metal centre with additional contributions from the metalated
aryl ring π-system. The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital
(LUMO) is localised on the dppz ligand in agreement with
results obtained for comparable complexes.
+
+
Figure 4. Plots of the HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) orbitals for 1 /2 from DFT
calculations.
Biological Studies
DNA Titrations.
III
The two new complexes incorporate a Ir (dppz) unit, a
moiety that is known to interact with DNA through
intercalation. Since binding to DNA often affects the optical
absorption and emission properties of such complexes the
+
+
interaction of complexes 1 and 2 with calf-thymus DNA (CTDNA) was investigated using optical spectroscopy.
Figure 5 Examples
of optical titrations (A) Details of changes in the UV-Visible
+
spectrum
of 1 on addition of duplex DNA (B) Increases in emission of complex
+
1 on addition of DNA. Conditions: 5 mM Tris buffer, 25 mM NaCl pH 7.4 at 25 °C
+
+
UV visible absorption studies. Both 1 and 2 show
distinctive spectral changes on addition of duplex DNA with
the UV-Visible spectra of the complexes displaying
hypochromicity in their low energy bands (Figure 5A). These
changes are typically seen when a solvated complex moves
27
into the more hydrophobic environment of a DNA helix, and
are indicative of an interaction between the extended
aromatic system of the complex and stacked bases within the
duplex.
Luminescence studies. As is the case with most M(dppz)
complexes, DNA-induced changes in the emission properties of
both complexes could also be used as a spectroscopic tool for
2
studying their interactions with DNA. 1 µL Incremental
addition of 16.4 µM CT-DNA to buffered solutions of new
complexes leads to concomitant increases in emission (Figure
5B). Although these changes are not profound as those
2+
observed for the original DNA light switch [Ru(bpy)2(dppz)]
III
they are similar to those that occur with other Ir (dppz)
[3]
systems incorporating cyclometalated ancillary ligands ,
suggesting that emission is from a state with significant
III
3
Ir →dppz MLCT character.
Using the DNA-induced luminescence changes estimates of
binding parameters for the interaction of the complexes with
CT-DNA were calculated using the non-cooperative McGhee
Von Hippel model for fitting non-linear Scatchard plots (Table
2). As expected from previously discussed electrostatic
considerations, the estimated affinities are notably lower than
those observed for dicationic M(dppz) systems but they are
still appreciable and are typical of those reported for other
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
2, 39, 40
monocationic dppz complexes
It had been hoped that
+
the introduction of the benzyl groups in 1 might provide
additional intercalative π-stacking to stabilise the DNA adduct.
Unfortunately, from the data in Table 2 the binding constant
for the benzyl substituted complex is inferior to its propyl
substituted analogue; it seems the larger benzyl groups act to
+
sterically hinder DNA binding relative to 2 . However, given
that the complexes do nevertheless interact with a
representative biomolecule, their cellular uptake properties
were then investigated.
+
+ a
Table 2. Estimated duplex DNA binding parameters for complexes 1 and 2 .
-1
Complex
+
1
+
2
K (M )
4
2.38 × 10
4
5.37 × 10
n (bp)
2.7
9.5
ligands which may be a factor in terms of diffusion across the
cell membrane (Figure 7). ICP-MS measurements were taken
at 1 hour and 24 hours after exposure to the complexes and
these time points show there is steady accumulation over the
24 hour time period, indicative of passive diffusion taking
place across the membrane. A comparison of the data also
shows that uptake of both complexes is roughly twice as high
in A2780 cells relative to MCF7 cells. These data reflect the
observed trend in IC50 figures, illustrating how cytotoxicity
effects are often, at least partly, a function of cell
internalisation.
a
a Data fitted with R2 ≥ 0.95.
Cellular uptake and imaging studies
Uptake experiments were performed in two common cell
lines, the breast cancer cell line MCF7 and the ovarian cancer
line A2780. When either was exposed to 50 μM solutions of
both complexes over a 24 hour period, wide field
luminescence microscopy images revealed that both
complexes displayed moderate cellular uptake. Furthermore,
whilst the complexes bind DNA in cell free conditions the
images indicated that both complexes are largely localized in
the cytosol – Fig 6. Localization within the cytosol as opposed
to the nucleus is often due to a subtle balance of
41
hydrophobicity and lipophobicity and in this case it seems
the lipophilicity of monocation is driving the observed
preference in accumulation.
Cell Line
A2780
MCF-7
+
[1 ] / µM
369
163
+
[2 ] / µM
119
14
Figure 7. ICP-MS data summarizing cellular uptake of both the complexes in
A2780 and MC7 cells
+
+
+
Figure 6 Cellular uptake of 1 (left) and 2 (right) in MCF7 cells following 24 hours
exposure to 50 μM solutions (Pseudo colouring has been employed in all the
images)
The cytotoxicity of the complexes, assessed through IC50
values obtained using the well-established MTT assay, are
relatively low with MCF7 cells (>200 μM); however, the
cytotoxicity towards A2780 is higher with IC50 values of 59 μM
+
+
(1 ) and 151 μM (2 ) respectively. It was noted that A2780 cells
treated with the complexes appeared to be particularly
brightly stained. Consequently more detailed studies on the
uptake and localization of the two complexes were carried out.
To accurately determine the extent of Intracellular
localization, ICP-MS experiments were carried out on both
MCF7 and A2780 cells under identical conditions. Interestingly,
+
in both cell lines, 1 is taken up to higher concentrations than
+
2 ; by a factor of 3 in A2780 and a factor of 11 in MCF-7. It
+
should be noted that complex 1 contains more lipophilic
+
The microscope images of cells stained by 1 and 2 show
punctate emission from the cytosol suggesting specific
localization. To explore this issue further, Intracellular tracking
experiments were performed. However before these could
begin, the spectral characteristics of both the complexes were
considered so that suitable co-staining dyes for tracking
experiments could be selected.
Since
lipophilic
cations
often
accumulate
in
42,
43
mitochondria,
colocalisation
with
commercial
mitochondrial probes was investigated. When excited at 470
nm, both complexes showed emission in the RFP region (570
nm to 620 nm). Therefore Mito Tracker Green, MTG, was
chosen for initial intracellular tracking experiments as this
shows emission in the GFP channel. Although MTG is also
excited excitation at 470 nm its emission output is observed at
500 nm to 540 nm. To rule out the possibility of cross talk
between adjacent channels, experiments with Mito Tracker
Deep Red, MTDR, were also carried out. MTDR is excited at
640 nm and emits at 660 nm to 700 nm (Cy5 region). As
shown in Figure 8, these experiments showed a very strong
correlation between the intracellular emission localities of the
complexes with MTG and MTDR. Intensity versus distance
plots as shown in the same Figure also confirmed a near
perfect colocalisation mitochondria. Indeed calculated Pearson
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
ARTICLE
Journal Name
+
+
and Mander coefficients for both 1 and 2 indicate ≥90%
colocalisation with MTDR (Table 3).
Experimental Section
General methods
Chemicals were purchased from Aldrich and Acros. Iridium(III)
chloride was purchased from Precious Metal Online (Monash,
Australia) and used as received. All complexation reactions
were carried out under nitrogen. Dipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'44
45
c]phenazine (dppz) and aryl triazole ligand precursors were
1
13
prepared according to literature procedures. H NMR and C
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz
instrument. Mass spectrometry data were collected on a
Bruker Micro Q-TOF instrument. UV-Visible absorption spectra
were recorded on a Varian Cary 300 spectrophotometer and
corrected emission spectra were recorded on a Horiba
Fluoromax-4 spectrofluorometer. Luminescent lifetime
measurements were carried out using an Edinburgh
Instruments Mini-Tau spectrometer.
Computational methods
+
Figure 8. +Colocalisation studies of (A) Top: Complex 1 with MTG Bottom:
complex 2 with MTDR+ in A2780
cells using wide field microscopy B. Detailed co+
localization data for 1 : left: 1 , middle: MTDR, right: merged image. In all cases
the lower images is a intensity vs. distance trace along the line shown in the
upper image. Pseudo colouring has been employed in all the images.
+
+
Table 3. Colocalisation coefficients for complexes 1 and 2 with MTDR
Compound
+
1
+
2
Pearson’s
Coefficient
Mander’s
M1
Mander’s
M2
0.903
0.885
0.999
0.986
0.925
0.863
Conclusion
Two new iridium(III) complexes bearing a dppz DNAintercalating ligand along with cyclometalated phenyltriazole
ligands have been reported. The complexes exhibit
luminescent “switch on” effect on binding with reasonable
DNA binding coefficients for monocationic complexes. Cellular
uptake experiments show that they localize within the cytosol.
The complexes are shown to localize at the mitochondria with
relatively high Pearson coefficients (> 0.89) and this
demonstrates the specificity of the probes towards
mitochondria. Given the wide range of triazole-based ligands
III
available and the tuneable photophysical properties of Ir
moieties, these new complexes open up new avenues for the
development of novel, highly functionalisable, iridium(III) DNA
imaging probes and phototherapeutics.
DFT calculations were carried out using the NWChem 6.3
46
software package , B3LYP hybrid functional (20% Hartree–
47
Fock) method has been used for calculations , Stuttgart
48
relativistic small core ECP for transition metals and 6-311G*
basis sets for all other atoms. Molecular geometries and
molecular orbitals pictures were realised using the ccp1
graphical software. For all the studied complexes, the ground
state geometries were first optimized and molecular orbital
energies determined. The COSMO solvation model, built in
NWChem software, was used in obtaining the electronic
spectra and molecular orbital energy levels and plots.
Bn
Synthesis of [Ir(ptz )2(dppz)](PF6)2 (1.PF6)
1-benzyl-4-(phenyl)-1,2,3-triazole (1.134 mmol) was added to a
3:1 solution of ethoxyethanol and water (18 mL). Iridium
chloride trihydrate (0.567 mmol) was then added and the
solution left to stir at 110°C overnight. The solution was then
allowed to cool and the crude biscyclometalated dimer filtered
under vacuum and purified by column chromatography (2%
methanol in DCM). The resulting dimer, together with 2
equivalents
of
dppz,
was
refluxed
in
25
ml
methanol/dichloromethane 1:2 for 12 hours. After cooling, the
solvent was removed and the product purified by column
chromatography with a 7:1:0.5 solution of acetonitrile,
saturated potassium nitrate and water respectively. The
orange fraction was dried under vacuum, redissolved in
acetonitrile and filtered. The solution was dried again and the
solid was dissolved in methanol and stirred with an excess of
NH4PF6 for 3 hours. The product was recrystallised with ether,
washed with water and again ether. (Yield 57%)
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 9.29 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.28 Hz, 2H);
8.44 (dd, J = 5.16, 1.44 Hz, 2H); 8.17 (dd, J = 6.36, 3.40 Hz,
2H); 8.15 (s, 2H); 8.00 (dd, J = 6.6, 3.4 Hz, 2H); 7.74 (dd, J =
8.2, 5.16 Hz, 2H); 7.57 (dd, J = 7.56 Hz, 2H); 7.15-7.02 (m,
12H); 6.91 (td, J = 7.5, 1.4 Hz, 2H); 6.36 (d, J = 7.12 Hz, 2H);
5.38 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, 2H); 5.34 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, 2H).
13
C NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 157.18, 152.99, 150.15, 145.08,
142.41, 139.22, 135.91, 134.62, 134.27, 132.59, 132.41,
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
129.94, 129.47, 128.84, 128.58, 128.41, 127.9, 127.31, 122.98,
122.63, 120.11, 55.22
+
+
HRMS (ESI) calcd: C48H34IrN10 943.2597, found: 943.2590 (M )
increase of CT-DNA concentration only caused small changes in
the absorption spectra.
Luminescence DNA titration:
Pr
Synthesis of [Ir(ptz )2(dppz)](PF6)2 (2.PF6)
The synthetic procedure was the same as that for 1.PF6, except
that 4-phenyl-1-propyl-1,2,3-triazole was used in place of 1benzyl-4-(phenyl)-1,2,3-triazole, was used. (Yield 64%)
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 9.46 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.16 Hz, 2H);
8.55 (dd, J = 5.12, 1.32 Hz, 2H); 8.40 (s, 2H); 8.17 (dd, J = 6.54,
3.44 Hz, 2H); 7.96 (dd, J = 6.56, 3.4 Hz, 2H); 7.89 (dd, J = 8.66,
5.31 Hz, 2H); 7.6 (d, J = 7.52 Hz, 2H); 7.02 (td, J = 7.66, 1.04 Hz,
2H); 6.90 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 2H); 6.37 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H); 4.22
(t, J = 7 Hz, 4H); 1.80 (m, J = 7.22 Hz, 4H); 0.77 (t, J = 7.41 Hz,
6H).
13
C NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 155.89, 151.49, 148.89, 143.56,
141.11, 137.79, 134.5, 133.18, 130.97, 130.62, 128.68, 127.88,
126.68, 125.59, 121.21, 120.78, 118.1, 51.74, 21.59, 8.16.
+
HRMS (ESI) calcd m/z: C40H34IrN10 847.2597, found: 847.2581
+
(M )
Salt metathesis
Both 1.PF6 and 2.PF6 complexes, after their isolation,
underwent an anion metathesis. The corresponding solids
were respectively stirred in methanol with Amberlite resin
(complex:resin 1:5 w/w) for four hours. After that, the
suspensions were filtered, the solvent was removed under
vacuum and the products recrystallised from acetonitrile and
ether, quantitatively yielding the salts 1.Cl and 2.Cl. Successful
removal of the hexafluorophosphate anion was confirmed by
31 1
19 1
the absence of signals in P{ H} and F{ H} NMR spectra.
DNA titration Experiments
Reagents:
Reagents used for carrying out DNA titration experiments
include CT-DNA (Aldrich), tris buffer (5 mM Tris, 25 mM NaCl)
(in-house).
UV-Visible absorption DNA titration:
UV-Visible spectra were recorded on a thermally regulated
Varian-Carey Bio-300 UV-Visible spectrometer, using quartz
cells of 10 mm path length at 25°C. Spectra were baseline
corrected using Cary Win UV software and were diluted
accordingly to give readings between 0.2 and 1.0 absorbance
units.
Method:
3 ml of buffer was loaded into a 10 mm path length cuvette
and allowed to equilibrate inside the spectrometer before a
+
+
baseline reading was taken. 50 μM complex (1 or 2 ) solution
was prepared using the buffer and the plain buffer was
replaced with this to titrate with the CT-DNA. After
equilibration the spectrum was recorded between 200-600
nm. 1 μL of a concentrated stock solution of CT-DNA (16.4
mM) was added to the cuvette and mixed vigorously with a
pipette to ensure homogeneity. The spectrum was recorded
after leaving the sample to equilibrate for 3 minutes
eliminating the air bubbles completely. This procedure was
continued until the absorbance became constant or the
Luminescence spectra were recorded on a thermally regulated
Jobin-Yvon FluoroMax-3 spectrophotometer operating in
luminescence wavelength scan mode at 25°C, with 5 nm
excitation and emission slit widths.
Method:
3 ml of buffer was loaded into a 10 mm path length cuvette
and allowed to equilibrate inside the spectrometer before a
+
+
baseline reading was taken. 50 μM (1 or 2 ) was prepared
using the buffer and the plain buffer was replaced with this to
titrate with the CT-DNA. After equilibration the spectrum was
recorded between 200-600 nm. 2.5 μL of a concentrated stock
solution of CT-DNA (16.4 mM) was added to the cuvette and
mixed vigorously with a pipette to ensure homogeneity. The
spectrum was recorded after leaving the sample to equilibrate
for 3 minutes eliminating the air bubbles completely. The
emission spectrum was recorded, showing an increase in
emission on incremental addition of CT-DNA. The procedure
was continued until saturation.
Microscopy Experiments:
Reagents:
Reagents used for the Microscopy and Tissue culture
experiments include, RPMI 1640 with L-glucose and sodium
bicarbonate (Aldrich), Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) (Aldrich),
foetal bovine serum (Aldrich), penicillin streptomycin (Aldrich),
4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Aldrich), Vectashield h-1000
(mounting agent) (Aldrich), 50 mM ammonium chloride
(Aldrich), Mito Tracker Green (Aldrich), Mito Tracker Deep Red
(Aldrich). Other items required for sample preparation include
26 mm X 76 mm Microscopy glass slides, 22 mm X 22 mm (170
± 5 µm square Cover glasses (Thor labs.)
Instrument Details:
Wide Field Fluorescence Microscopy was carried out by using
Nikon Dual cam Wide Field Fluorescence Microscope. The
details of the Microscope include: Excitation source: SpectraX
LED excitation (395 nm, 440 nm, 470 nm, 508 nm, 561 nm, 640
nm); Emission Filter sets: Single filters for DAPI, GFP, RFP, Cy5;
Quad filter for DAPI/GFP/RFP/Cy5 with matching emission
filter wheel; Detector set: Dual Andor Zyla sCMOS, 2560 x
2160; 6.5μm pixels and inbuilt NIS software was employed for
Wide Field Deconvolution.
Method:
The Wide Field Fluorescence Microscopy involves collection of
greater quantity of light (Including out of focus light) compared
the confocal microscopy technique which involves loss of more
than 30% of light as out of focus light is discarded during image
17
acquisition as it is a pointillistic technique . The Wide field
Microscopy technique involves improvement in resolution only
after post processing the Z-stacks acquired. Processing of
acquired data was achieved by using Fiji software.
Deconvolution Wide Field Microscopy:
The Deconvolution procedure involves the processing of the
raw Wide Field images obtained from the Nikon Dual cam
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 7
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
ARTICLE
Journal Name
Wide Field Microscope. This image processing is carried out by
using the NIS software. Deconvolution is a computationally
intensive image processing technique which helps in improving
the contrast and Axial resolution post acquisition of the images
from 400 nm to 350 nm. During the Deconvolution procedure
the raw Wide Field images are processed by removing the out
of focus blur from stack of acquired images called Z-Stack.
Cellular uptake (Single colour imaging):
+
+
The complexes 1 and 2 were excited at 470 nm and the
emission was collected between 570 nm to 620 nm (RFP
channel of Dual cam Nikon Wide Field Fluorescence
Microscope). The Wide Field imaging conditions employed for
the cellular uptake studies of the A2780 and MCF7 cells is
shown Fig. 6 and Fig. S1 and in the Supporting Information
videos (CC203-204-WF-Video-1, CC203-204-WF-Video-2 and
CC203-204-WF-Video-4). The Wide Field Microscopy
conditions maintained include: Thickness of the Z stack
(Sections 40 to 100); Section spacing (0.250 to 0.500);
Thickness of the sample (8 to 15).
Colocalisation (Multi colour imaging):
+
+
The complexes 1 and 2 was excited at 470 nm and the
emission was collected between 570 nm to 620 nm (RFP
channel), Mito Tracker Green was excited at 470 nm and the
emission was collected between 500 nm to 530 nm (GFP
channel), Mito Tracker Red Deep Red was excited at 640 nm
and collected between 650 nm to 700 nm (Cy5 channel). The
+
+
colocalisation of 1 and 2 with Mito Tracker Green and the
+
+
colocalisation of 1 and 2 with Mito Tracker Deep Red is
+
shown in Fig. 8 and the colocalisation of 1 was shown in the
Supporting Information video CC203-204-WF-Video-3. The
colocalisation experiments were carried out using the same
microscopy conditions as mentioned above for the cellular
uptake experiments.
Tissue Culture Experiments:
+
+
Cellular Uptake studies for 1 and 2 :
A2780 or MCF7 cells were seeded on cover slips (22 mm X 22
mm, 170 ± 5 µm square cover glasses) placed in six well plates
in RPMI culture medium containing (10% FBS and 1% penicillin
streptomycin) for 24 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. After 24 hours
when 70% confluency was achieved the cells were washed
+
with RPMI culture medium then the cells were treated with 1
+
49
or 2 (50 μM or 100 μM) for 24 hours . Cells were then
washed thrice with culture medium. After that cells were
washed again with Phosphate Buffer Saline (2X PBS). After
+
+
carrying out the live cell uptake of the 1 or 2 and the cells
were then fixed with 4% PFA for 15 minutes and then washed
thrice with PBS and two times and then the cover slips were
mounted using mounting medium (Vectashield h-1000).The
Coverslips were then sealed using nail varnish and the sample
were then imaged by Wide Field Fluorescence Microscopy
using the Dual cam Nikon.
+
+
Colocalisation studies for 1 and 2 :
+
+
The colocalisation studies of 1 and 2 was carried out by using
Mito Tracker Green and Mito Tracker Red. A2780 cells were
seeded on cover slips (22 mm X 22 mm, 170 ± 5 µm square
Cover glasses) placed in six well plates in RPMI culture medium
containing (10% FBS and 1% penicillin streptomycin) for 24
49
hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. After 24 hours when 70% confluency
was achieved the cells were washed with RPMI culture
medium then the cells were treated with 1 μM (Mito Tracker
Green or Mito Tracker Deep Red) for 30 minutes and washed
+
with 2X RPMI culture media and then treated with 50 μM 1 or
+
2 for 24 hours. Cells were then washed thrice with culture
medium. After that cells were washed again with Phosphate
Buffer Saline (2X PBS). After carrying out the live cell uptake of
+
+
the 1 or 2 and the cells were then fixed with 4% PFA for 15
minutes and then washed thrice with PBS and two times and
then the cover slips were mounted using mounting medium
(Vectashield h-1000). The coverslips were then sealed using
nail varnish and the sample were then imaged by Wide Field
Fluorescence Microscopy using the Dual cam Nikon.
ICP-MS:
Cell cultures were grown on 60 mm dishes at a seeding density
5
of 5 x10 cells per dish and incubated for 24 h. Cells were then
treated with the complex (solubilised in and maintained at
10% PBS/H2O: 90% medium throughout all solutions) at the
stated concentration and incubated for 24 h. All complex
solution (or control medium) was removed, cells washed and
200 µL serum free medium added. Cells were detached by
scraping and transferred to a falcon tube, where 20 µL of each
sample was removed for cell counting. Each sample was
transferred to a glass sample tube, 1 ml concentrated HNO3
added, heated to 60°C overnight and then diluted to 5 ml total
volume with ultrapure Milli-Q H2O before analysis of iridium
content by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
(ICP-MS). Using the obtained iridium concentration, the
sample volume, number of cells per sample and the
-12
assumption of a cell volume of 2 x10 L an estimate of
-1
intracellular concentration (mol L ) could be deduced.
Cytotoxicity:
Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented
-1
-1
with 10% FBS, 100 mg ml streptomycin, 100 mg ml
penicillin, and 2 mM glutamine at 37°C in a humidified
atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Experimental cultures were
4
grown on 48 well plates at a seeding density of 5 x 10 cells per
well and incubated for 24 h. The cells were then treated with
complex (solubilised in DMSO and PBS and maintained at a
final concentration of 9.99% PBS and 0.01% DMSO throughout
all solutions) of a 1 – 200 μM concentration range, in triplicate,
and incubated for 48 h. The culture media was removed and
-1
cells incubated with MTT (0.5 mg ml dissolved in PBS) for 30 –
40 min. The MTT was removed and formazan product eluted
using 120 µl/well acidified isopropanol, 100 µl of which was
transferred to a 96 well plate for the absorbance to be
quantified by spectrophotometer (540 nm, referenced at 640
nm). An average absorbance for each concentration was
calculated and cell viability was determined as a percentage of
the untreated negative control wells (0.1% DMSO:9.99%
PBS:90% medium, average of triplicate). Data were plotted in a
graph of concentration against cell viability to produce a curve
from which the IC50 value could be derived by interpolation.
8 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the University of Huddersfield
(S.A., C.C.) and the University of Sheffield (S.S., P.J.J., D.R.,
C.G.W.S and J.A.T) for supporting this work. A.S. also thanks
the Foundation Blanceflor Boncompagni-Ludovisi for financial
support. As a member of the UK Materials Chemistry
Consortium PIPE also thanks the EPRSC and the UK HPC
national resource, Archer (EP/L000202), as well as the
Huddersfield High Performance Computing Research Group for
computational facilities utilised in this work. S.S and J.A.T are
grateful to the Imagine Imaging Cohort 2022 Futures initiative
of the University of Sheffield and would like to thank the MRC
funding for the microscopy facilities.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
References
1. E. Baggaley, J. A. Weinstein and J. A. G. Williams,
Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2012, 256, 1762-1785.
2. M. R. Gill and J. A. Thomas, Chemical Society Reviews, 2012,
41, 3179-3192.
3. K. K. W. Lo, Accounts of Chemical Research, 2015, 48, 29852995.
4. K. K. W. Lo, S. P. Y. Li and K. Y. Zhang, New Journal of
Chemistry, 2011, 35, 265-287.
5. K. K. W. Lo, M. W. Louie and K. Y. Zhang, Coordination
Chemistry Reviews, 2010, 254, 2603-2622.
6. Q. Zhao, C. Huang and F. Li, Chemical Society Reviews, 2011,
40, 2508-2524.
7. V. Fernández-Moreira, F. L. Thorp-Greenwood and M. P.
Coogan, Chemical Communications, 2010, 46, 186-202.
8. C. P. Montgomery, B. S. Murray, E. J. New, R. Pal and D.
Parker, Accounts of Chemical Research, 2009, 42, 925-937.
9. J. A. Thomas, Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44, 44944500.
10. A. E. Friedman, J. K. Barton, J. C. Chambron, J. P. Sauvage, N.
J. Turro and J. K. Barton, Journal of the American Chemical
Society, 1990, 112, 4960-4962.
11. R. M. Hartshorn and J. K. Barton, Journal of the American
Chemical Society, 1992, 114, 5919-5925.
12. G. Li, L. Sun, L. Ji and H. Chao, Dalton Transactions, 2016, 45,
13261-13276.
13. Z. Chen, K. Y. Zhang, X. Tong, Y. Liu, C. Hu, S. Liu, Q. Yu, Q.
Zhao and W. Huang, Advanced Functional Materials, 2016,
26, 4386-4396.
14. S. Liu, Y. Zhang, H. Liang, Z. Chen, Z. Liu and Q. Zhao, Optics
Express, 2016, 24, 15757-15764.
15. W. Lv, Z. Zhang, K. Y. Zhang, H. Yang, S. Liu, A. Xu, S. Guo, Q.
Zhao and W. Huang, Angewandte Chemie - International
Edition, 2016, 55, 9947-9951.
16. S. Liu, N. Zhou, Z. Chen, H. Wei, Y. Zhu, S. Guo and Q. Zhao,
Optics Letters, 2017, 42, 13-16.
17. K. Y. Zhang, Q. Yu, H. Wei, S. Liu, Q. Zhao and W. Huang,
Chemical Reviews, 2018.
18. H. Z. He, K. H. Leung, W. Wang, D. S. H. Chan, C. H. Leung and
D. L. Ma, Chemical Communications, 2014, 50, 5313-5315.
19. F. Lu and T. Nabeshima, Dalton Transactions, 2014, 43, 95299536.
20. C. Jin, J. Liu, Y. Chen, L. Zeng, R. Guan, C. Ouyang, L. Ji and H.
Chao, Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, 21, 1200012010.
21. T. S. M. Tang, K. K. Leung, M. W. Louie, H. W. Liu, S. H. Cheng
and K. K. W. Lo, Dalton Transactions, 2015, 44, 4945-4956.
22. K. Y. Zhang, H. W. Liu, M. C. Tang, A. W. T. Choi, N. Zhu, X. G.
Wei, K. C. Lau and K. K. W. Lo, Inorganic Chemistry, 2015, 54,
6582-6593.
23. L. L. Sun, Y. Chen, S. Kuang, G. Y. Li, R. L. Guan, J. P. Liu, L. N.
Ji and H. Chao, Chem.-Eur. J., 2016, 22, 8955-8965.
24. R. R. Ye, C. P. Tan, L. N. Ji and Z. W. Mao, Dalton
Transactions, 2016, 45, 13042-13051.
25. Y. Liu, P. Zhang, X. Fang, G. Wu, S. Chen, Z. Zhang, H. Chao,
W. Tan and L. Xu, Dalton Transactions, 2017, 46, 4777-4785.
26. J. R. Shewring, A. J. Cankut, L. K. McKenzie, B. J. Crowston, S.
W. Botchway, J. A. Weinstein, E. Edwards and M. D. Ward,
Inorganic Chemistry, 2017, 56, 15259-15270.
27. S. Stimpson, D. R. Jenkinson, A. Sadler, M. Latham, A. Wragg,
A. J. H. M. Meijer and J. A. Thomas, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54, 3000-3003.
28. Y. M. Chen, A. G. Zhang, Y. J. Liu and K. Z. Wang, Journal of
Organometallic Chemistry, 2011, 696, 1716-1722.
29. Y. M. Chen, A. G. Zhang and K. Z. Wang, Applied
Organometallic Chemistry, 2011, 25, 521-529.
30. K. K. W. Lo, C. K. Chung and N. Zhu, Chemistry - A European
Journal, 2006, 12, 1500-1512.
31. F. Shao, B. Elias, W. Lu and J. K. Barton, Inorganic Chemistry,
2007, 46, 10187-10199.
32. R. A. Smith, E. C. Stokes, E. E. Langdon-Jones, J. A. Platts, B.
M. Kariuki, A. J. Hallett and S. J. A. Pope, Dalton Transactions,
2013, 42, 10347-10357.
33. S. K. Tripathy, U. De, N. Dehury, P. Laha, M. K. Panda, H. S.
Kim and S. Patra, Dalton Transactions, 2016, 45, 1512215136.
34. J. D. Crowley and D. A. McMorran, Top. Heterocycl. Chem.,
2012, 28, 31-83.
35. P. A. Scattergood and P. I. P. Elliott, Dalton Transactions,
2017, 46, 16343-16356.
36. P. A. Scattergood, A. Sinopoli and P. I. P. Elliott, Coordination
Chemistry Reviews, 2017, 350, 136-154.
37. A. B. Tamayo, S. Garon, T. Sajoto, P. I. Djurovich, I. M. Tsyba,
R. Bau and M. E. Thompson, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 8723.
38. C.-H. Yang, S.-W. Li, Y. Chi, Y.-M. Cheng, Y.-S. Yeh, P.-T. Chou,
G.-H. Lee, C.-H. Wang and C.-F. Shu, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44,
7770.
39. V. G. González, University of Sheffield, 2006.
40. C. Metcalfe, H. Adams, I. Haq and J. A. Thomas, Chemical
Communications, 2003, 9, 1152-1153.
41. S. Trapp and R. W. Horobin, European Biophysics Journal,
2005, 34, 959-966.
42. M. P. Murphy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Bioenergetics,
2008, 1777, 1028-1031.
43. H. K. Saeed, P. J. Jarman, S. Archer, S. Sreedharan, I. Q.
Saeed, L. K. McKenzie, J. A. Weinstein, N. J. Buurma, C. G. W.
Smythe and J. A. Thomas, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56, 12628-12633.
44. Y. Sun, S. N. Collins, L. E. Joyce and C. Turro, Inorg. Chem.,
2010, 49, 4257.
45. B. S. Uppal, R. K. Booth, N. Ali, C. Lockwood, C. R. Rice and P.
I. P. Elliott, Dalton Transactions, 2011, 40, 7610-7616.
46. M. Valiev, E. J. Bylaska, N. Govind, K. Kowalski, T. P.
Straatsma, H. J. J. V. Dam, D. Wang, J. Nieplocha, E. Apra, T.
L. Windus and W. d. Jong, Comp. Phys. Commun., 2010, 181,
1477.
47. P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chabalowski and M. J. Frisch,
J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 11623.
48. D. Andrae, U. Haussermann, M. Dolg, H. Stoll and H. Preuss,
Theor. Chim. Acta, 1990, 77, 123.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 9
Please do not adjust margins
Please do not adjust margins
ARTICLE
Journal Name
49. Y. Zhou, J. Jia, W. Li, H. Fei and M. Zhou, Chemical
Communications, 2013, 49, 3230-3232.
10 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins