← Back
Cytotoxicity of the organic ruthenium anticancer drug Nami-A is correlated with DNA binding in four different human tumor cell lines.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
DOI 10.1007/s00280-015-2903-8
REVIEW ARTICLE
Antimitotic drugs in the treatment of cancer
Rustelle Janse van Vuuren1 · Michelle H. Visagie1 · Anne E. Theron1 ·
Annie M. Joubert1
Received: 8 September 2015 / Accepted: 3 November 2015 / Published online: 12 November 2015
© The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract Cancer is a complex disease since it is adaptive in such a way that it can promote proliferation and
invasion by means of an overactive cell cycle and in turn
cellular division which is targeted by antimitotic drugs
that are highly validated chemotherapy agents. However,
antimitotic drug cytotoxicity to non-tumorigenic cells and
multiple cancer resistance developed in response to drugs
such as taxanes and vinca alkaloids are obstacles faced in
both the clinical and basic research field to date. In this
review, the classes of antimitotic compounds, their mechanisms of action and cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy
and other limitations of current antimitotic compounds are
highlighted, as well as the potential of novel 17-β estradiol
analogs as cancer treatment.
Keywords Taxanes · Epothilones · Vinca alkaloids ·
Estrogens · 2-Methoxyestradiol
Introduction
For 2015, 1.658 million new cancer cases and 589,430
deaths were predicted worldwide and, according to the
National Cancer Registry (NCR), more than 100,000 South
Africans are annually diagnosed with cancer with a survival rate of 60 % [1, 2].
Cancer refers to abnormal growth or malignant tumors
and is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of cells
despite restriction of nutrients and space [3]. Cancer cells
* Michelle H. Visagie
michelle.visagie@up.ac.za
1
Department of Physiology, University of Pretoria, Private
Bag x 323, Arcadia 0007, South Africa
have unlimited replicative potential via the upregulation
of telomerase (a specialized deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
polymerase) expression that counters telomerase erosion
(Fig. 1) [4].
In addition, cancer cells have the ability to evade tumor
suppressor genes, resulting in sustained chronic proliferation. These cells may avoid apoptosis induction by the loss
of protein p53 (TP53) tumor suppressor function, or in the
case of necrosis, proinflammatory signals that recruit cells
of the immune system, which may promote malignancy
and invasion [3, 5]. Cancer cells may also produce their
own growth factor ligands such as Bombesin-like peptides
(secreted by human small cell lung cancer) or signal to
non-tumorigenic surrounding tissue to supply cancer cells
with growth factors (Fig. 1) [6]. These cells may activate
invasion and metastasis by developing alterations in shape
and attachment to the extracellular matrix and neighboring
cells (Fig. 1) [3].
Tumorigenic cells can induce angiogenesis by upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factors, such as vascular
endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) by either hypoxia
or oncogene signaling which stimulates endothelial cell
migration and proliferation (Fig. 1) [7]. VEGF along with
other factors recruit tumor-associated macrophages and
other factors including chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 2
(CCl2) chemokine (C–C motif), ligand 5 (CCL5), colonystimulating factor 1 (CSF-1), endothelins (ET-1) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) which stimulate cancer
cell proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis [7].
The mutated form of endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) supports chronic proliferation by enabling
cells to reprogram their cellular metabolism to keep up
with high energy demands [8]. In virus-induced cancers
and some non-viral etiology cancers, cells have the ability to evade destruction by immune cells, especially, T- and
13
1102
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
Fig. 1 Cancer cells have the ability to evade anti-proliferating signals
sent from surrounding tissues, sustain proliferative signals and avoid
cell death which enable continuous replication, active metastasis and
invasion and induce angiogenesis. Images were created using Microsoft® PowerPoint® 2013 software Pty/Ltd
B-lymphocytes, natural killer cells and macrophages [9,
10]. These cancer cells may secrete immunosuppressive
factors such as TGF-β, or block interferon gene transcription or their promoters [3]. In addition, tumor cells recruit
cells that are actively immunosuppressive, such as regulatory T cells, or suppress capsid protein production and subsequently immune cell detection [9]. Current cancer treatment includes an array of treatment options and regimens
that are specific for each cancer type. Treatment efficacy
has inter-individual variability which will be discussed
below.
spindle formation and chromosome orientation, cells
remain either in a prolonged arrest state with subsequent
apoptosis induction or in a senescence-like G1 state [15].
Microtubules are formed during interphase and are vital for
correct chromosome segregation and cell division undergoing mitosis [16]. Microtubule dynamics is faster during
mitosis compared to interphase, and thus microtubules are
an ideal drug target since cancer cells possess hyperproliferative activity [16].
Overview of current treatment
Drugs that act on microtubules can be divided into two
groups according to their mechanism of action as either
microtubule-destabilizing agents or microtubule-stabilizing
agents [17]. Destabilizing drugs inhibit the polymerization of microtubules when administered at high concentration [18]. Most destabilizing drugs bind to either the vinca
domain or taxoid-binding domain [16]. Those that bind to
the vinca domain found in the interface between β- and
α-tubulin (called vinca alkaloids) include vinflunine, vincristine, vinorelbine, vindesine and eribulin [19, 20]. Those
that bind to the colchicine domain include cryptophycins,
dolastatins and combretastatin-A4 [21, 22]. Drugs that
enhance microtubule polymerization when administered
at high concentrations, stabilize microtubules and prevent Ca2+- or cold-induced depolymerization, and subsequent disassembly, include eribulin, spongistatin, rhizoxin,
maytansinoids second- and third-generation taxanes,
epothilones, ixabepilone and many others [16, 23]. Taxanes, epothilones and many others belonging to this group
Current cancer treatments that are quite common include
chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Another less established treatment is immunotherapy, where biotherapy
results in the increased recognizability of cancer cells by
immune cells [11]. Immunotherapy includes cancer vaccines (either prophylactic or therapeutic vaccines) that
reprogram memory T cells and increase cancer autologous
(Ag)-specific effector T cells in vivo [12]. Targeted therapies are specifically aimed at cancer-associated molecules.
These include rituximab (Rituxan®) and ibritumomab
(Zevalin®) that target anti-CD20 antibodies on non-Hodgkins lymphoma cells [13].
Antimitotic drugs inhibit polymerization dynamics of
microtubules (paclitaxel and vinblastine) by activating
the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) blocking transition from metaphase to anaphase [14]. Subsequently, cells
undergo mitotic arrest and since the compound disrupts
13
Mechanism of action of antimitotic drugs
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
bind to the inner surface of the microtubule at a taxoidbinding site on β-tubulin [16, 23]. Compounds that bind
to an overlapping non-vinca and non-taxoid site on drugresistant βII- and βIII-tubulin isotypes include the microtubule-stabilizing drugs; peloruside A (PLA) and laulimalide
(undergoing pre-clinical study) [24]. PLA and laulimalide
binding results in a mitotic arrest at the G2/M phase of the
cell cycle and subsequently cell death [24]. Another characteristic that makes these compounds superior to taxanes
and vinca alkaloids is that they are poor substrates of P-gp
drug efflux pumps [25, 26].
Cell cycle targets
Cell cycle control is maintained by cyclin-dependent protein kinases (Cdks) which are activated when binding to
cyclin proteins [27]. Different cyclin proteins are expressed
at different stages of the cell cycle and form cyclin-Cdk
complexes that initiate growth, mitosis and cytokinesis
depending on the cyclin being expressed (Fig. 2) [28].
Cyclin/Cdk activity is regulated by factors including
the DNA-binding transcription factors elongation factor
2 1-8 (E2F 1-8) and pocket proteins produced by the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene (pRB) responsible for
the synthesis of cyclin proteins, cyclin-dependent kinase
inhibitors (Cdki), phosphorylation status, proteolysis via
ubiquitylation and subcellular localization in the nucleus or
Fig. 2 Cell cycle control by the expression of growth factors (green),
primarily in the G1 phase. Internal cell cycle signaling regulates the
expression of different cyclin proteins (white arrows) at different
stages of the cycle. Images were created using Microsoft® PowerPoint® 2013 software Pty/Ltd
1103
cytosol [28]. Cyclin D transcription is activated by growth
factors and combines with cyclin-dependent protein kinase
4 (CDK4) [28]. The activation of Cdk4, when in complex
with cyclin D, activates the E2F transcription system that
aids in the induction of events resulting in DNA synthesis
at the interface of the G1 and S phase [29]. After DNA replication (S phase), the cell enters another growth phase, G2,
and activation of the cyclin B/Cdk1 complex induces entry
into mitosis [28]. Two major interfaces exist within the cell
cycle, namely the G1/S- and G2/M phase. Metaphase-toanaphase interface is ensured by checkpoints including cell
dimension and nutrient availability, DNA replication, DNA
damage and spindle attachment [28].
Spindle assembly
Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis is
ensured by feedback control via the spindle assembly
checkpoint [31]. Correct spindle formation occurs when
the sister kinetochores are connected to microtubules from
opposite poles resulting in a bi-oriented chromosome or
amphitelic attachment [31]. Incorrect chromosome segregation may result in aneuploidy and chromosome instability which is a characteristic of many aggressively proliferating tumors [32].
When a spindle fiber attaches to the kinetochore on a
chromatid, the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) senses
the tension between connected kinetochores and spindle
fibers, as well as the lack of tension across unattached kinetochores and non-amphitelic attachments [33]. Unattached
kinetochores signal MCC to inhibit anaphase-promoting
complex/cyclosome (APC/C) [34]. The unattached kinetochore is then activated by Aurora kinase B and the active
kinetochore recruits mitotic arrest deficient 1 (Mad1), budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (bub1) and multipolar
spindle 1 (MPS1) [34, 35]. Aurora kinase B also modulates
the Rod-Zwilch Zw10 (RZZ) complex which is involved in
the recruitment process of Mad1 [31]. Mad1 binds to the
unattached kinetochore and recruits mitotic arrest deficient
2 (Mad2) in closed formation resulting in the formation
of more Mad2 proteins in a closed formation from Mad2
proteins in an open conformation [36]. The Mad2 proteins
(closed formation) form a complex with mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine protein kinase Bub1 beta (BubR1),
mitotic arrest deficient 3 (Mad3) and budding uninhibited
by benzimidazole 3 (Bub3) resulting in cell-division cycle
protein 20 (Cdc20) inhibition via phosphorylation and subsequently cannot bind to the anaphase-promoting complex
cyclosome (APC/C) nor activate the mitotic proliferating factor (MPF) or degrade securing [37]. The cell enters
mitotic arrest until proper spindle attachment has occurred
at metaphase, and dynein is activated [27, 30]. Dynein is
a motor protein that removes the MCC complex from the
13
1104
attached kinetochore [38]. Cdc20 is thus no longer inhibited, and active cdc20 is ubiquitinated by APC [27, 30].
Cdc20 activation of APC/C degrades securin (a protein
responsible for the inhibition of the protein separase) via
ubiquitination [39]. Separase cleaves and deactivates cohesion allowing sister chromatids to dissociate from one
another and the cell enters anaphase [40].
Antimitotic drugs activate the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), since they disrupt microtubule formation and
chromosome segregation resulting in the characteristic
mitotic arrest [15]. Since the compounds are disruptive to
the correct attachment of microtubules, the cells undergo
cell death via apoptosis [15].
Apoptosis
Apoptosis (adenosine triphosphate-dependent form of cell
death) may occur through four different pathways, namely
the intrinsic-, extrinsic-, endoplasmic reticulum-induced
and the perforin/granzyme pathway [40].
The intrinsic pathway is usually governed by the B-cell
lymphoma protein 2 (Bcl-2) protein family that can either
be pro- or anti-apoptotic [41]. Pro-apoptotic proteins of the
Bcl-2 family include Bcl-2-associated x protein (Bax), BH3
interacting domain death agonist (bid), Bcl-2 antagonist of
cell death (Bad), Bcl interacting protein (Bim), Bcl-2 interacting killer (Bik), Bik-like killer protein (Blk) and snf
B-cell lymphoma protein 10 (Bcl10) [41]. Bcl-2 proteins
are responsible for mitochondrial membrane disruption and
are regulated by tumor suppressor p53 [42]. Pores form in
the mitochondrial membrane resulting in the reduction of
the electrochemical gradient across the membrane [43].
The water-soluble heme protein, cytochrome complex (Cyt
c) and serine protease Htr A2/Omi are transported from
within the mitochondria through the disrupted outer membrane into the cytosol increasing effector caspases activity
[44]. Cyt c binds apoptotic protease activating factor (Apaf1) and cysteinyl aspartic acid-protease 9 (procaspase 9),
thereby activating procaspase 9 [41].
In human cancer, defects in the control of apoptosis that
lead to the protection of cancer cells to apoptotic stimuli
are critical in tumor development [45]. Overexpression of
anti-apoptotic or pro-survival proteins of the Bcl family
such as Bcl 2, B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xL), myeloid cell leukemia 1 (Mcl-1), Bcl-2-like protein 2 (BCL2L2
or Bcl-w) and Bcl-2-related protein A1 (A1/Bfl-1) has been
reported to be present in cancer [45]. Overexpression of
each of these above-mentioned proteins is associated with
different tumor types, for example Bcl-xL in multiple myeloma and Bcl-w in gastric cancer cells [46, 47]. Bcl-2 overexpression occurs in 90 % of colorectal cancer, 80 % of
B-cell lymphomas, 70 % of breast and 30–60 % of prostate
13
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
cancer [48]. The tubulysin analog, KEMTUB10, binds
tubulin at the vinca domain inhibiting tubulin polymerization [49]. KEMTUB10 triggers apoptosis in MCF-7- and
MDA-MB-231 cells by p53 upregulation and downregulation of Bim [49]. Bcl-2 overexpression confers cancer cell
resistance pertaining to taxanes and, since KEMTUB10
does not prominently rely on Blc-2 phosphorylation to
induce apoptosis, the compound is less susceptible to
acquired Bcl-2 resistance [49].
The extrinsic pathway involves transmembrane receptors
that form part of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor gene superfamily called death receptors [41]. Death
receptors and their corresponding ligands are fatty acid
synthetase receptor (FasR) and fatty acid synthase ligand
(FasL), tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNF R1) and
tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), death receptor (DR) 3
and Apo3 ligand (Apo3L), DR4 and Apo2L, and DR5 and
Apo2L [50]. When these receptor-ligand complexes form,
cytoplasmic adaptor proteins are recruited, including Fasassociated death domain (FADD) in the case of the FasLRasR complex and TNF receptor-associated death domain
(TRADD) in the case of the TNF-α-TNFR1 complex [51,
52]. The latter results in death-inducing signaling complex
(DISC) formation, subsequent activation of caspase 8 and
the induction of the execution pathway [53]. The execution
pathway is induced by the activation of executioner caspase
3 and subsequent DNA degradation, chromatin condensation, cell shrinkage, apoptotic body formation and membrane blebbing [41].
The taxane taxol induces the extrinsic pathway by upregulating Aurora-A (Aur-A) which phosphorylates FADD at
S203 and subsequently induces DISC formation in human
cervical adenocarcinoma cell line (Hela), human gastric
adenocarcinoma cell line (AGS) and human colorectal
adenocarcinoma cell line (HTC15) [54]. Aur-A phosphorylation of FADD at S203 allows for FADD S203A phosphorylation by polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) [54]. The doublephosphorylated FADD (FADD-DD) also dissociates from,
and subsequently activates, receptor-interacting serine/
threonine protein (RIP1) inducing the caspase-independent
apoptotic pathway [54]. Several above-mentioned proteins
including Bcl-2 and p53 are involved in another cell death
and survival pathways, namely autophagy that will be discussed below.
Autophagy
Autophagy is a form of cell death where organelles and
proteins are degraded resulting in energy that is packaged
into double membrane vesicles known as autophagosomes
[56]. Autophagic vesicles are transported along microtubule tracks fusing with lysosomes for degradation and
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
1105
Table 1 Classes of antimitotic drugs and their stages of development [25, 26, 58, 61, 65, 67, 70, 71, 83, 85, 105–107]
Class
Name
Mechanism of action
Approved for treatment of (cancer type)
Drugs used as cancer treatment regimens
Taxanes
Paclitaxel (taxol®)
Microtubule-stabilizing
Metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (in combination with gemcitabine)
Cabazitaxel (Jextana®)
Microtubule-stabilizing
Metastatic, hormone-resistant prostate cancer (in combination with prednisone)
Epothilones
Ixabepilone (Ixempra®)
Microtubule-stabilizing
Vinca
alkaloids
Eribulin (E7389, ER086526, 6)
Microtubule-destabilizing
Metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer (resistant to
taxanes and anthracycline)
Recurrent metastatic breast cancer (pre-treated with
taxanes and anthracycline)
Class
Name
Drugs undergoing clinical trials
Vinca alkaloids
Vintafolide (EC145)
Class
Mechanism of action
Phase of clinical trials
Microtubule-destabilizing
In Clinical phase II trials as sole treatment for
ovarian and lung cancer
Name
Mechanism of action
Model
Peloruside A (PLA, CHEBI:77692)
Microtubule-stabilizing
Laulimalide
Microtubule-stabilizing
Lung and breast tumor xenograft
studies in athymic nu/nu mice
High toxicity and low tumor inhibition in human breast cancer
and fibrosarcoma xenograft
studies in athymic NCr-nu/nu
mice
Drugs undergoing in vivo studies
Non-taxoid site microtubulestabilizing agents
Class
Name
Mechanism of action
Effective in cell line
ESE-15-ol
Microtubule-destabilizing
Breast cancer (MCF-7, MDAMB-231) and lung cancer (A549)
ESE-16
Microtubule-destabilizing
Breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7,
MDA-MB-231) and esophageal
cancer (SNO)
Drugs undergoing in vitro studies
Estrogen derivatives
recycling [55]. Autophagic pathways are upregulated when
non-tumorigenic cells have a higher energy demand, such
as nutrient deprivation, resulting in a stress state [55]. Cancer cells are resistant to autophagy by shrinking and entering a reversible dormant state when highly stressed due to
the upregulation of autophagy by stressors such as starvation and chemotherapeutic drugs [55]. Through this mechanism, autophagy has been shown to support the survival of
late stage or established tumors [3, 55].
Autophagic vesicles are transported by means of microtubules. Antimitotic drugs, disrupting the microtubule formation, result in vesicle accumulation, since they inhibit
their fusion with lysosomes and thus their degradation and
substrate recycling [55].
The taxane paclitaxel has been reported to inhibit
autophagy in MCF-7 (a tumorigenic estrogen receptorpositive (+) cell line) and SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells
that have entered mitosis by blocking the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase vacuolar protein sorting protein
34 (Vps34), a protein vital in induction of autophagosome
formation [55]. In MCF-7 and SK-BR-3 cells that were not
undergoing mitosis because of mitotic slippage, paclitaxel
prevented autophagy by hindering autophagosome trafficking [55].
Classes of antimitotic drugs
Taxanes
Taxanes are commonly used as chemotherapy treatment
for breast cancer [57]. The taxane paclitaxel (taxol®) used
in combination with carboplatin (an alkylating agent that
has cytotoxic activity) is a common treatment regimen for
13
1106
lung carcinoma (Table 1) [58]. Paclitaxel inhibits microtubule depolymerization by binding to β-tubulin, resulting in
mitotic arrest and subsequent activation of caspase-dependent apoptosis by Bcl-2 proteins [56]. Taxanes usually
increase the patients’ survival in carcinoma of the lung,
breast and ovaria. However, taxanes are also associated
with side effects, namely peripheral neuropathy, myelosuppression, arthralgias and skin reactions including flushes
and rashes (urticarial) [58, 59]. Since these side effects
accumulate throughout the course of therapy and affect the
patient’s quality of life, adjunctive medications are required
to minimize subsequent side effects [57].
Efficacy of taxanes as adjuvant therapy in early breast
cancer is unclear [57]. Data of one clinical trial suggest
that an addition of paclitaxel to anthracycline (an antibiotic
class of chemotherapy that is cell-cycle non-specific) was
only beneficial for women who had an overexpression of
the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in
tumors of early breast cancer [57]. HER2 signaling influences multiple forms of taxane resistance including cell
survival, as well as drug efflux and drug metabolism [60].
Cabazitaxel (Jextana®), a new microtubule-stabilizing
taxane has been effective against metastatic breast- and
metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer that acquired
resistance to both paclitaxel and docetaxel [61]. Cabazitaxel has been improved by decreasing multidrug-resistant
protein recognition for the compound and in turn reducing
potential cancer cell resistance [61]. The antimitotic drug
was approved for the treatment of metastatic, hormoneresistant prostate cancer in Europe (March 2011) (Table 1)
[62]. Side effects of cabazitaxel include nausea, diarrhea,
vomiting and neurotoxicity [61].
Epothilones
Epothilones A and B were initially found in mycobacterium sorangrum cellulosum as cytotoxic metabolites that
stabilize microtubules. Epothilones show higher cytotoxicity than taxanes in vitro [63]. For example, epothilone B
shows a higher cytotoxicity to human ovarian cancer cells
(OV-90) when compared to paclitaxel [64]. Epothilone B
competitively inhibits paclitaxel, since both bind at the
same site on tubulin-β [64]. However, epothilones and
taxanes show no common mechanisms of resistance [64].
Epothilones are effective in cancers overexpressing class
III β-tubulin where taxane resistance is attributable to the
overexpression of class III β-tubulin [64].
Ixabepilone (Ixempra®) is a lactam analog of epothilone
B (Table 1) [63]. The compound was approved by the USA
in 2007 for use in the treatment of metastatic or locally
advanced breast cancer that is resistant to taxanes and
anthracycline [65]. The agent was the first epothilone to
be approved for clinical use. Ixabepilone is metabolically
13
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
more stable than its precursor, epothilone B, and thus the
most clinically advanced epothilone with regards to its efficacy and tolerability in breast cancer patients [63]. Ixabepilone cytotoxicity is decreased cell lines expressing P-glycoprotein (P-gp), namely Madin-Darby canine kidney cells
transfected with the human multidrug resistance 1 gene
(MDCK-MDR1) and pig kidney epithelial cells transfected
with the human multidrug resistance 1 gene (LLCPKMDR1) [66]. The latter thus confirms that ixabepilone is
a substrate of the ATP-binding cassette efflux transporter,
P-glycoprotein (P-gp/MDR1/ABC1) such as taxane class
[66]. However, ixabepilone is not a substrate of the breast
cancer resistance protein (BCRP1/ABCC-2), a protein
that is significantly overexpressed in doxorubicin- and
paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer cells (MCF-7/DOX and
MCF-7AX), which explains the potency of ixabepilone- in
taxane-resistant breast cancer [66].
Vinca alkaloids
The first vinca alkaloids were extracted from the plant
catharamthus roseus, native to Madagascar, and were found
to possess anticancer activities in 1960 [20]. Vina alkaloids
include vincristine which was approved as chemotherapy
treatment in 1963 in the USA [20]. These compounds bind
to β-tubulin close to the guanosine triphosphate (GTP)binding sites (the vinca domain) at the β-α-tubulin heterodimers interface [20]. Binding at the vinca domain
prevents curved tubulin from straightening and, in turn,
interferes with growth and assembly of microtubules [67].
Eribulin (E7389, ER086526, 6), a compound derived from
marine sponge, was approved in 2010 in the USA as the
third-line treatment for patients with recurrent metastatic
breast cancer (pre-treated with taxanes and anthracycline)
(Table 1) [20, 67]. However, treatment was accompanied
with neutropenia and fatigue, and the lower occurrence of
peripheral neuropathology compared to older drugs is a
potential benefit of eribulin [68]. Unfortunately, the drug is
a substrate for the P-gp efflux pump and may demonstrate
decreased activity against cancer cells that overexpressed
these efflux pumps [69]. Vintafolide (EC145) has recently
shown promise in ovarian and lung cancer during phase II
clinical trials as sole treatment (Table 1) [70, 71]. The compound consists of the microtubule-destabilizing agent desacetylvinblastine hydrazide, folic acid, a hydrophilic peptide
spacer and a disulfide-containing self-immolative linker
[72]. Vintafolide delivers the microtubule-destabilizing
agent to the folate receptors (FR) of FR-tumor cells [72].
FR is overexpressed in various carcinomas and mediates
the uptake of folic acid-conjugated compounds via endocytosis [73]. Once vintafolide is taken up in the cell, the
disulfide bond is cleaved and active desacetylvinblastine
hydrazide diffuses through the endosome to the cytoplasm
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
where it causes microtubule disruption [74]. Since FR is
expressed in small amounts in non-tumorigenic tissues it is
an ideal tumor target [73].
Microtubule‑targeting estrogen derivatives
Estrogen aids in the growth, differentiation and maintenance of many tissues in the body including breast, uterine,
cardiovascular, brain and urogenital tract tissues of both
sexes by activating the nuclear estrogen receptors (ER),
ERα and ERβ, to induce transcription factor activation [75,
76]. In various types of cancer, especially breast and ovarian cancer, estrogen is known to promote proliferation and
invasion [75]. The goal for using estrogen-derived anticancer compounds is to compete with estrogen for the binding
to estrogen receptors (ER) with antagonistic activity [75].
Fulvestrant (ICI182780) is an example of such a compound
and shows to be more effective when compared to tamoxifen, the current non-steroidal anti-estrogen compound used
as standard hormone treatment for breast cancer [75, 77].
In postmenopausal woman, estrone sulfate is found
in high concentrations in breast tissue (3.3 ± 1.9 pmol/g
vs. premenopausal woman 1.2 ± 0.3 pmol/g) and more
so in patients with breast carcinoma [76–79]. The concentration of estrone sulfate is up to seven times higher
in breast tissue than in plasma and is converted to estradiol sulfate in hormone-dependent breast cancers via the
17-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 enzyme [79,
80]. The majority of breast cancer begins as a hormonedependent cancer where estradiol plays a vital role in tumor
growth and development [81].
2‑Methoxyestradiol and in silico‑designed analogs
2-Methoxyestradiol (2ME), an analog of 17-β estradiol, occurs naturally in the human body and exerts antimitotic activity [44]. 2ME binds at the colchicine domain
of β-tubulin in microtubules resulting in microtubule
depolymerization [44, 82]. At low concentrations, 2ME
destabilizes microtubules and impairs correct spindlekinetochore attachment; the cell subsequently undergoes
cell death as a result of prolonged mitotic arrest [82]. The
17-hydroxy group pertaining to 2ME makes it a target for
17-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-mediated metabolism
(in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and liver) resulting in
rapid metabolism and subsequent low bioavailability [83].
2-Ethyl-3-O-sulfamoyl-estra-1,3,5(10)15-tetraen-17-ol
(ESE-15-ol),
2-ethyl-3-O-sulfamoyl-estra-1,3,5(10)16tetraene (ESE-16) and 2-ethyl-3-O-sulfamoyl-estra1,3,5(10),15-tetraen-3-ol-17-one are sulfamoylated analogs
of 2ME and have been in silico designed in order to selectively bind to and inhibit carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX)
in vitro [83, 85]. CA IX, a zinc membrane-bound enzyme,
1107
is upregulated in most types of cancer and acidifies the
extracellular environment by converting carbon dioxide and
water to carbonic acid [86]. Acidification of the cancerous
environment promotes further metastasis and invasion [83].
The acidification of the extracellular environment may also
lead to chemoresistance, since the uptake of weakly basic
anticancer drugs is decreased by the formation of a H+ gradient across the cellular membrane [86].
CAIX is also involved in cellular migration and invasion of human cervical carcinoma cells (C33A) in vitro
[87]. In non-tumorigenic physiological conditions, this
metalloenzyme is only found in a few non-tumorigenic
tissues such as coelomic epithelial cells, basal cells in
and around hair follicles, gastric mucosa cells and cells
in the ventricular lining of the choroid plexus [86, 88].
During carcinogenesis, the expression of CAIX in these
tissues is either reduced or lost [86]. Since CAIX is predominantly expressed in carcinomas from non-tumorigenic tissues that do not express CAIX, it is an ideal protein marker for cancer [86]. The upregulation of CAIX is
induced by hypoxia via the transcription factor, hypoxiainducible factor-1 (HIF-1) [84]. 2ME inhibits HIF-1 target gene expression in tumor cells at the posttranscriptional level [88]. The alpha subunit of HIF (HIF-1α) is
overexpressed in many human cancers [89]. 2ME blocks
accumulation of HIF-1α in the nucleus and in turn prevents activation of several genes that are crucial for cell
transformation and survival under hypoxic conditions
[89].
Modifications to the chemical structures of these compounds, including the addition of a sulfamoylated group
or the removal of a hydroxyl group, increase the bioavailability of these compounds as it prevents first pass metabolism by the liver [44, 85, 90]. In addition, this modification
allows these compounds to bind to carbonic anhydrase II
(CAII) in red blood cells, resulting in a slower release of
these compounds into the bloodstream and in turn avoiding first pass metabolism [85]. These characteristics allow
ESE-15-ol and ESE-16 to be potentially more effective
than their rapidly metabolized precursor 2ME [83–85]. An
increase in G1 phase (an indication of cell death via DNA
damage), a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential
(an indication of apoptosis via the intrinsic pathway) and
G2/M arrest, followed by disrupted spindle formation or the
formation of multiple spindle poles, are events induced by
ESE-15-ol and ESE-16 [83–85]. MDA-MB-231, a metastatic tumorigenic estrogen receptor-negative cell line,
MCF-7 and MCF-12A, a non-tumorigenic estrogen receptor-negative (−) cell line, were used for evaluation. A general 50 % inhibition of cellular growth was seen across the
three cell lines at nanomolar concentrations after 24 and
48 h exposure periods, proving the compounds are more
potent than 2ME in vitro [83–85]. The compounds also had
13
1108
a reduced effect on the non-tumorigenic cell line, MCF12A (−), when compared to the tumorigenic cell lines that
are exposed to ESE-15-ol, and this was especially evident
after 48 h [83–85].
In both ESE-15-ol and ESE-16 exposed cells, there was
a disruption in phosphorylation of the pro-apoptotic binding protein, Bcl-2, at serine 70 in the MDA-MB-231 (−)
cell line, indicating activation of apoptosis via the intrinsic
pathway, corresponding with the decrease in mitochondrial
membrane potential observed [83–85]. The studies thus
demonstrated that these compounds possess potential as
antimitotic agents with respect to potency and bioavailability in vitro (Table 1) [83–85].
Cancer cell resistance to antimitotic compounds
Resistance to antimitotic drugs can occur at different stages
of treatment, and the comprehension of these resistance
mechanisms is vital in the development of novel antimitotic
compounds [16]. Genetic changes that exist prior to treatment are the first cause of therapeutic failure of chemotherapy, and this is known as intrinsic or primary resistance
[91]. Secondary or acquired resistance is a result of drug
treatment [91].
One mechanism developed by tumor cells, when
exposed to chemotherapy including antimitotic drugs
in vitro, is the membrane efflux pumps of the ATPbinding cassette (ABC) family [16]. These transporters
export the compounds that have accumulated within the
cells through the cellular membrane avoiding toxicity of
the drugs [16]. The multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1
or ABCD1) is responsible for the production of P-gp,
part of the ABC family, which effluxes many hydrophobic antimitotic drugs such as taxanes and vinca alkaloids
[16, 92]. ABCD1 and P-gp overexpression is involved in
both intrinsic drug resistance and acquired drug resistance [91]. The multidrug-associated protein 1 (MRP1)
transports vinca alkaloids out of the cell [16]. MRP2
and MRP7 are responsible for the export of taxanes and
MRP7 for the transport of epothilone B [16]. Expression
of these efflux pumps shows a correlation with a lower
response to antimitotic chemotherapy in primary tumors
[16]. Thus, developing drugs that are not substrates of
P-gp, such as second- and third-generation taxanes and
epothilones, whose structural modifications allow them
to avoid P-gp, are essential to overcome the obstacles of
cancer resistance [92]. Another strategy is to make use of
molecules, where the activity is strengthened by overexpressed P-gp efflux pumps [91]. It has been reported that
combination treatment of a multidrug-resistant breast cancer cell line (MCF-7/ADR) with paclitaxel and the P-gp
inhibitor Verapamil had a synergistic effect on cytotoxicity in vitro [93].
13
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
Mutations in p53 gene expression, activating mutations of phosphatidyl-3-phosphate kinase (PI3 K) and gene
expression of the Ras/Raf pathway all have been reported
to result in increased resistance to antimitotic drugs in
tumor cells [94]. Hypomethylation of phosphatase and
tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN), a
tumor suppressor gene, destabilizes the gene and results in
the upregulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt
kinase (PI3 K/Akt) pathway, which activates Akt, a protein that regulates anti-apoptotic proteins and cell cycle
entry resulting in survival signaling [91]. The loss of PI3 K
regulation increases Bad phosphorylation, resulting in the
deactivating of the pro-apoptotic protein and subsequently
protects the mitochondrial membrane from disruption
[94]. This increases resistance to cell death induced by
the intrinsic pathway. The overexpression of the mitogenactivated protein kinase cascade (Ras/Raf/MAPK) pathway, where Ras (a small GTP kinase receptor) activates
MAPK, results in the activation of Raf. Mutations of these
genes that upregulate this pathway lead to survival signaling [91].
The overexpression of class III β-tubulin isotope, a
marker used in the diagnosis of solid tumor malignancies such as ovarian and lung cancer, is suspected of being
responsible for resistance to paclitaxel [95]. βIII-tubulin
enhances microtubule dynamic instability and counteracts
the stabilizing action of taxanes [17]. It also affects the efficacy of vinca alkaloids [91]. βIII-tubulin is expressed in
stressed cells deprived of oxygen and nutrients [91]. The
expression of βIII-tubulin is a survival pathway, that, when
inhibited in nude mice, increases the sensitivity of cells
to chemotherapy, but also inhibits colony formation and
the development of tumorigenesis [17]. Mutations in the
β-tubulin gene in vitro and in patients also seem to contribute to drug resistance, specifically antimitotic compounds
[94]. Regulating proteins of microtubules such as mitotic
centrosome-associated kinesin (MCAK), stathmin and tau
are associated with antimitotic drug resistance [91]. Deregulation of proteins of the SAC via gene amplification such
as the protein Aurora kinase via AURORA-A amplification
also contributes to resistance in drugs that target microtubules [96].
HER2 signaling activates the transcription factor Y-boxbinding protein-1 (YBX), and in turn increases survival,
reduces induction of apoptosis and enhances drug efflux
[97, 98]. A positive feedback loop exists between HER2
and YBX that promotes further cancer cell immortality
[91]. Thus, HER2 overexpression results in increasingly
aggressive tumors and HER2-amplified cancer types pose
resistance to taxanes by regulating P-gp efflux pumps [60].
The latter is accomplished by means of survivin, which is
crucial in spindle assembly formation, and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (P21CIP1) that inhibits cell cycle
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
progression at G1 [60]. Augmentation of HER2 occurs in
20–25 % of breast cancer types, and HER2-targeted therapy
(trastuzumab and lapatinib) has been reported to increase
life expectancy by 50 %. Reoccurrence after treatment is a
major obstacle faced in the clinic, and the mechanisms of
resistance to these compounds have not yet been confirmed
[99]. Another factor influencing resistance is hypoxia, commonly found in the center of solid tumors [100]. Hypoxia
potentially reduces drug access and efficacy [100]. This
oxygen-deprived state in tumors influences cell cycle control signaling pathways and angiogenesis and increases
invasion and metastasis [100]. Hypoxia also inhibits the
intrinsic pathway of apoptosis by reducing the Bax/Bcl-2
ratio [100]. Since an increase in resistance due to hypoxia
in the presence of paclitaxel is reversed by increased cyclin
B1 levels, hypoxia reduces the antimitotic activity of paclitaxel by downregulation of cyclin B1 [100].
The non-coding microRNAs is another gene expression
regulator found both over- and under expressed in several
types of cancer including breast, prostate, lung, gastric,
colon, ovarian cancer and leukemia. MicroRNA confers
cancer cell resistance to antimitotic drugs since it regulates
various genes involved in the cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [101]. miR-125b is overexpression in
taxol-resistant breast cancer cells, 435TRP and metastatic
breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231. miR-125b targets Bcl-2
antagonist killer 1 (Bak1), a pro-apoptotic protein, and
confers resistance to antimitotics such as paclitaxel [102].
MicroRNAs also target Bcl-2, Bax, Bcl-xL and caspase
3 and 7 expression leading to the disruption of apoptosis
[101]. Other microRNAs, such as miR-27, regulates the
multidrug resistance 1 gene (MDR1) increasing drug efflux
transporters (P-gp) and, in turn, confers resistance to its
substrates including taxanes and vinca alkaloids [101].
The theory that antimitotic drugs target and kill cancer
cells, because of their high proliferation rate in vitro, is
contradicted with the low doubling time of tumor cells,
such as primary breast cancer (40–300 days) and metastatic breast cancer (30–90 days) [15, 103]. To date, the
mechanisms of anticancer drugs have predominantly
been evaluated in cancer cell lines in vitro and mouse
models with deficient immunity [104]. These models
restrict research from determining the influence of these
drugs on actual human tumor physiology, since they lack
a representation of the immune system and vasculature
[104]. This may lead to several action mechanisms going
undetected.
Conclusion
Antimitotic drugs such as the taxane cabazitaxel (Jextana®)
(accepted in 2011), and the vinca alkaloid vintafolide
1109
(EC145, phase II), show promise in taxane and anthracycline-resistant cancers [71]. However, the toxicity of these
drugs, as well as acquired drug resistance, allows for the
opportunity to develop agents with increased tolerability
and specificity [58, 59]. Development of novel compounds
that disrupt mitosis without interfering with microtubule
dynamics in non-dividing or highly proliferating (such as
neutrophils) non-tumorigenic cells is the main focus in
new antimitotic drug research. The in silico-designed 2ME
analogs show promise since they were designed to target
CAIX in the tumorigenic environment, increasing the bioavailability which will be evaluated in vivo in the near future
[83–85].
Studies investigating the pathways of cancer cell resistance to antimitotic drugs will result in subsequent identification of novel biomarkers for future chemotherapy possessing increased efficacy. However, the limited success
of antimitotics in clinical trials is mainly due to antimitotic targeting mechanisms varying substantially between
in vitro and in vivo models since the drug resistance is
poorly understood. In addition, unraveling the role of
mitotic machinery and identifying the determinants of drug
resistance in different models will contribute to the embedded scientific knowledge regarding antimitotic efficacy and
subsequently yield novel biochemical targets for improved
chemotherapy.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Medical
Research Council of South Africa, the Research Committee of the
Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of Pretoria, the Cancer
association of South Africa and the National Research Foundation.
Author’s contributions R. J. Janse van Vuuren was involved in
initial compilation of manuscript. R. J. Janse van Vuuren and M. H.
Visagie were involved in editing and final compilation of manuscript.
A.E. Theron and A. M. Joubert were involved in final editing, supervision and acquiring of funds.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a
link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were
made.
References
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2015) Cancer statistics. CA
Cancer J Clin 65:5–29
2. GLOBOCAN/World Health Organization (2012) Cancer facts
sheets. IARC. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.
aspx. Accessed 16 May 2014
13
1110
3. Hanahan D, Ra Weinberg (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next
generation. Cell 144:646–674
4. Hahn WC, Stewart SA, Brooks MW, York SG, Eaton E, Kurachi
A, Beijersbergen RL, Knoll JHM, Meyerson M, Weinberg RA
(1999) Inhibition of telomerase limits the growth of human cancer cells. Nat Med 5:1164–1170
5. Brown CJ, Lain S, Verma CS, Fersht AR, Lane DP (2009)
Awakening guardian angels: drugging the p53 pathway. Nat
Rev Cancer 9:862–873
6. Cuttitta F, Carney DN, Mulshine J, Moody TW, Fedorko J,
Fischler A et al (1985) Bombesin-like peptides can function
as autocrine growth factors in human small-cell lung cancer.
Nature 316:823–825
7. Kim MY, Oskarsson T, Acharyya S, Nguyen DX, Zhang XHF,
Norton L, Massagué J (2009) Tumor self-seeding by circulating
cancer cells. Cell 139:1315–1326
8. Cairns RA, Harris IS, Mak TW (2011) Regulation of cancer cell
metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 11:85–95
9. Tindle RW (2002) Immune evasion in human papillomavirusassociated cervical cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2:59–64
10. de Visser KE, Eichten A, Coussens LM (2006) Paradoxical
roles of the immune system during cancer development. Nat
Rev Cancer 6:24–37
11. Dougan M, Dranoff G (2012) Immunotherapy of cancer. In:
Wang R-F (ed) Innate immune regulation and cancer immunotherapy, 1st edn. Springer, New York, pp 391–414
12. Palucka K, Ueno H, Banchereau J (2011) Recent developments
in cancer vaccines. J Immunol 186:1325–1331
13. Brannon-Peppas L, Blanchette JO (2012) Nanoparticle and
targeted systems for cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliver Rev
64:206–212
14. Masawang K, Pedro M, Cidade H, Reis RM, Neves MP, Corrêa
AG, Sudprasert W, Bousbaa H, Pinto MM (2014) Evaluation of
2′, 4′-dihydroxy-3, 4, 5-trimethoxychalcone as antimitotic agent
that induces mitotic catastrophe in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.
Toxicol Lett 229:393–401
15. Mitchison TJ (2012) The proliferation rate paradox in antimitotic chemotherapy. Mol Biol Cell 23:1–6
16. Dumontet C, Jordan MA (2010) Microtubule-binding agents:
a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov
9:790–803
17. Kavallaris M (2010) Microtubules and resistance to tubulinbinding agents. Nat Rev Cancer 10:194–204
18. Jordan MA, Kamath K (2007) How do microtubule-targeted
drugs work? Curr Cancer Drug Targets 7:730–742
19. Jordan MA, Wilson L (2004) Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 4:253–265
20. Liu Y-M, Chen H-L, Lee H-Y, Liou J-P (2014) Tubulin inhibitors: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat 24:69–88
21. Cruz-Monserrate Z, Mullaney JT, Harran PG, Pettit GR, Hamel
E (2003) Dolastatin 15 binds in the vinca domain of tubulin as
demonstrated by Hummel-Dreyer chromatography. Eur J Biochem 270:3822–3828
22. Attard G, Greystoke A, Kaye S, De Bono J (2006) Update on
tubulin-binding agents. Pathol Biol 54:72–84
23. Altmann K-H (2001) Microtubule-stabilizing agents: a growing class of important anticancer drugs. Curr Opin Chem Biol
5:424–431
24. Kanakkanthara A, Northcote PT, Miller JH (2012) βII-tubulin
and βIII-tubulin mediate sensitivity to peloruside A and laulimalide, but not paclitaxel or vinblastine, in human ovarian carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther 11:393–404
25. Gaitanos TN, Buey RM, Díaz F, Northcote PT, Spittle PT,
Andreu JM, Miller JH (2004) Peloruside A does not bind to
the taxoid site on β-tubulin and retains its activity in multidrugresistant cell lines. Cancer Res 64:5063–5067
13
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
26. Pryor DE, O’Brate A, Blicer G, Díaz JF, Wany Y, Wang Y,
Kabaki M, Jung MK, Andreu JM, Ghosh AK, Giannakakou P,
Hamel E (2002) The microtubule stabilizing agent laulimalide
does not bind in taxoid site, kills cells resistant to paclitaxel and
epothilones, and may not require its epoxide moiety for activity.
Biochemistry 41:9109–9115
27. Sánchez-Martínez C, Gelbert LM, Lallena MJ, de Dios A
(2015) Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors as anticancer
drugs. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 25:3420–3435
28. Berridge MJ (2012) Cell signaling biology. Portland Press Ltd,
London
29. Bartkova J, Lukas J, Guldberg P, Alsner J, Kirkin AF, Zeuthen J,
Bartek J (1996) The p16-cyclin D/Cdk4-pRb pathway as a functional unit frequently altered in melanoma pathogenesis. Cancer
Res 56:5475–5483
30. Takizawa CG, Morgan DO (2000) Control of mitosis by
changes in the subcellular location of cyclin-B1–Cdk1 and
Cdc25C. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:658–665
31. Musacchio A, Salmon ED (2007) The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:379–393
32. Giam M, Rancati G (2015) Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability in cancer: a jackpot to chaos. Cell Div 10:3–12
33. Shannon KB, Canman JC, Salmon ED (2002) Mad2 and BubR1
function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss
of tension. Mol Biol Cell 13:3706–3719
34. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ (2001) Checkpoint inhibition of
the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1,
BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J Cell Biol 154:925–936
35. Weiss E, Winey M (1996) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol 132:111–123
36. Chen R-H, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Murray A (1998) Spindle
checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits XMad2 to unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 143:283–295
37. Sharp-Baker H, Chen R-H (2001) Spindle checkpoint Bub1 is
required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3,
and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J Cell Biol
153:1239–1250
38. Burke DJ, Stukenberg PT (2008) Linking kinetochore-microtubule binding to the spindle checkpoint. Dev Cell 14:474–479
39. Hagting A, den Elzen N, Vodermaier HC, Waizenegger IC, Peters
J-M, Pines J (2002) Human securin proteolysis is controlled by
the spindle checkpoint and reveals when the APC/C switches
from activation by Cdc20 to Cdh1. J Cell Biol 157:1125–1137
40. Sun Y, Kucej M, Fan H-Y, Yu H, Sun Q-Y, Zou H (2009) Separase is recruited to mitotic chromosomes to dissolve sister chromatid cohesion in a DNA-dependent manner. Cell 137:123–132
41. Elmore S (2007) Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death.
Toxicol Pathol 35(4):495–516
42. Sorrentino G, Comel A, Del Sal G (2015) p53 orchestrates calcium signaling in vivo. Cell Cycle 14:1343–1344
43. Li H, Jia Z, Li G, Zhao X, Sun P, Wang J, Fan Z, Lv G (2015)
Neuroprotective effects of exendin-4 in rat model of spinal cord
injury via inhibiting mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Int J Clin
Exp Pathol 8:4837–4843
44. Nkandeu DS, Mqoco TV, Visagie MH, Stander BA, Wolmarans
E, Cronje MJ, Joubert AM (2013) In vitro changes in mitochondrial potential, aggresome formation and caspase activity by a
novel 17-β-estradiol analogue in breast adenocarcinoma cells.
Cell Biochem Funct 31:566–574
45. Kelly PS, Strasser A (2011) The role of Bcl-2 and its pro-survival relatives in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy. Cell Death
Differ 18:1414–1424
46. Krajewski S, Krajewska M, Shabaik A, Wang H-G, Irie S, Fong
L, Reed JC (1994) Immunohistochemical analysis of in vivo
patterns of Bcl-X expression. Cancer Res 54:5501–5507
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
47. Bae IH, Park M-J, Yoon SH, Kang SW, Lee S-S, Choi K-M,
Um H-D (2006) Bcl-w promotes gastric cancer cell invasion by
inducing matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression via phosphoinositide 3-kinase, Akt, and Sp1. Cancer Res 66:4991–4995
48. Liu W, Bulgaru A, Haigentz M, Stein C, Perez-Soler R, Mani S
(2003) The BCL2-family of protein ligands as cancer drugs: the
next generation of therapeutics. Curr Med Chem 3:217–223
49. Lamidi OF, Sani M, Lazzari P, Zanda M, Fleming IN (2015)
The tubulysin analogue KEMTUB10 induces apoptosis in
breast cancer cells via p53, Bim and Bcl-2. J Cancer Res Clin
Oncol 141:1575–1583
50. Broadhead ML, Dass CR, Choong PF (2009) Cancer cell
apoptotic pathways mediated by PEDF: prospects for therapy.
Trends Mol Med 15:461–467
51. Ashkenazi A, Dixit VM (1999) Apoptosis control by death and
decoy receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11:255–260
52. McDermott MF (2001) TNF and TNFR biology in health and
disease. Cell Mol Biol 47:619–636
53. Ganten T, Haas T, Sykora J, Stahl H, Sprick M, Fas S, Krueger A, Weigand MA, Grosse-Wilde A, Stremmel W, Krammer
PH, Walczak H (2004) Enhanced caspase-8 recruitment to and
activation at the DISC is critical for sensitisation of human
hepatocellular carcinoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by
chemotherapeutic drugs. Cell Death Differ 11:86–96
54. Jang M-S, Lee S-J, Kang NS, Kim E (2011) Cooperative phosphorylation of FADD by Aur-A and Plk1 in response to taxol triggers
both apoptotic and necrotic cell death. Cancer Res 71:7207–7215
55. Amaravadi RK, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Yin X-M, Weiss WA,
Takebe N, Timmer W, DiPaola RS, Lotze MT, White E (2011)
Principles and current strategies for targeting autophagy for
cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res 17:654–666
56. Veldhoen R, Banman S, Hemmerling D, Odsen R, Simmen T,
Simmonds A, Underhill DA, Goping IS (2013) The chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel inhibits autophagy through two distinct
mechanisms that regulate apoptosis. Oncogene 32:736–746
57. Bedard PL, Di Leo A, Piccart-Gebhart MJ (2010) Taxanes: optimizing adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:22–36
58. Cella D, Peterman A, Hudgens S, Webster K, Socinski MA
(2003) Measuring the side effects of taxane therapy in oncology. Cancer 98:822–831
59. Baldo BA, Pham NH (2013) Drugs used for chemotherapy.
Drug allergy, 1st edn. Springer, New Yoek, pp 399–418
60. de Hoon JP, Veeck J, Vriens BE, Calon TG, van Engeland M,
Tjan-Heijnen VC (2012) Taxane resistance in breast cancer: a
closed HER2 circuit? BBA-Rev Cancer 1825:197–206
61. Mita AC, Figlin R, Mita MM (2012) Cabazitaxel: more than
a new taxane for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer?
Clin Cancer Res 18:6574–6579
62. Pean E, Demolis P, Moreau A, Hemmings RJ, O’Connor D,
Brown D, Shepard T, Abadie E, Pignatti F (2012) The European Medicines Agency review of cabazitaxel (Jevtana®) for
the treatment of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer: summary of the scientific assessment of the committee for
medicinal products for human use. Oncologist 17:543–549
63. Risinger AL, Mooberry SL (2012) Microtubules as a target in
cancer therapy. In: Kavallaris M (ed) Cytoskeleton and Human
Disease, 1st edn. Humana Press, New York, pp 203–221
64. Rogalska A, Marczak A, Gajek A, Szwed M, Śliwińska A, Drzewoski J, Jóźwiak Z (2013) Induction of apoptosis in human
ovarian cancer cells by new anticancer compounds, epothilone
A and B. Toxicol In Vitro 27:239–249
65. Cortazar P, Justice R, Johnson J, Sridhara R, Keegan P, Pazdur
R (2012) US Food and Drug Administration approval overview
in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:1705–1711
1111
66. Shen H, Lee FY, Gan J (2011) Ixabepilone, a novel microtubule-targeting agent for breast cancer, is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp/MDR1/ABCB1) but not breast cancer resistance
protein (BCRP/ABCG2). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 337:423–432
67. Ravelli RB, Gigant B, Curmi PA, Jourdain I, Lachkar S, Sobel
A, Knossow M (2004) Insight into tubulin regulation from a
complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain. Nature
428:198–202
68. Swami U, Chaudhary I, Ghalib MH, Goel S (2012) Eribulin—a
review of preclinical and clinical studies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 81:163–184
69. Zheng W, Seletsky B, Palme M, Habgood G, Singer L, Dipietro LV, Chen JJ, Lydon PJ, Quincy DA, Towle MJ, Salvato
KA, Wels BF, Kuznetsov G, Aalfs KK, Kishi Y, Lewis MD,
LittleWeld BA, Yu MJ (2003) Structure-activity relationships
of synthetic halichondrin B analog E7389: in vitro susceptibility to PgP-mediated drug efflux. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res
7:2751
70. Edelman MJ, Harb WA, Pal SE, Boccia RV, Kraut MJ, Bonomi
P, Conley BA, Rogers JS, Messmann RA, Garon EB (2012)
Multicenter trial of EC145 in advanced, folate-receptor positive
adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Oncol 7:1618–1621
71. Naumann RW, Coleman RL, Burger RA, Sausville EA, Kutarska E, Ghamande SA, Gabrail NY (2013) PRECEDENT: a
randomized phase II trial comparing vintafolide (EC145) and
pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in combination versus
PLD alone in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J
Clin Oncol 31:4400–4406
72. Leamon CP, Vlahov IR, Reddy JA, Vetzel M, Santhapuram HKR,
You F, DePasquale SE, Nowara E, Gilbert L, Gersh RH, Teneriello MG, Harb WA, Konstantinopoulos PA, Penson RT, Symanowski JT, Lovejoy CD, Leamon CP, Morgenstern DE, Messmann
RA (2014) Folate–vinca alkaloid conjugates for cancer therapy: a
structure–activity relationship. Bioconjug Chem 25:560–568
73. Parker N, Turk MJ, Westrick E, Lewis JD, Low PS, Leamon
CP (2005) Folate receptor expression in carcinomas and normal
tissues determined by a quantitative radioligand binding assay.
Anal Biochem 338:284–293
74. Leamon CP (2008) Folate-targeted drug strategies for the treatment of cancer. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 9:1277–1286
75. Wan Z, Musa MA, Joseph P, Cooperwood JS (2013) Synthesis
and biological activity of 3-N-substituted estrogen derivatives
as breast cancer agents. Mini Rev Med Chem 13:1381
76. Filardo EJ, Thomas P (2012) Minireview: G protein-coupled
estrogen receptor-1, GPER-1: its mechanism of action and role
in female reproductive cancer, renal and vascular physiology.
Endocrinology 153:2953–2962
77. Abdulkareem I, Zurmi I (2012) Review of hormonal treatment
of breast cancer. Niger J Clin Pract 15:9–14
78. Howarth NM, Purohit A, Reed MJ, Potter BV (1994) Estrone
sulfamates: potent inhibitors of estrone sulfatase with therapeutic potential. J Med Chem 37:219–221
79. Pasqualini J, Chetrite G, Blacker C, Feinstein M, Delalonde L,
Talbi M, Maloche C (1996) Concentrations of estrone, estradiol,
and estrone sulfate and evaluation of sulfatase and aromatase
activities in pre-and postmenopausal breast cancer patients. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1460–1464
80. Pasqualini JR (2004) The selective estrogen enzyme modulators
in breast cancer: a review. Biochim Biophys Acta 1654:123–143
81. Henderson BE, Ross R, Bernstein L (1988) Estrogens as a
cause of human cancer: the Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation award lecture. Cancer Res 48:246–253
82. Gökmen-Polar Y, Escuin D, Walls CD, Soule SE, Wang Yuefang, Sanders Kerry L, LaVallee Theresa M, Wang M, Guenther
BD, Giannakakou P, Sledge GW (2005) β-Tubulin mutations
13
1112
are associated with resistance to 2-methoxyestradiol in MDAMB-435 cancer cells. Cancer Res 65:9406–9414
83. Stander BA, Joubert F, Tu C, Sippel KH, McKenna R, Joubert
AM (2013) Signaling pathways of ESE-16, an antimitotic and
anticarbonic anhydrase estradiol analog, in breast cancer cells.
PLoS One 8:e53853–e53871
84. Stander A, Joubert F, Joubert A (2011) Docking, synthesis, and
in vitro evaluation of antimitotic estrone analogs. Chem Biol
Drug Des 77:173–181
85. Stander BA, Joubert F, Tu C, Sippel KH, McKenna R, Joubert
AM (2012) In vitro evaluation of ESE-15-ol, an estradiol analogue with nanomolar antimitotic and carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity. PLoS One 7:e52205
86. Thiry A, Dogne J-M, Masereel B, Supuran CT (2006) Targeting tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase IX in cancer therapy.
Trends Pharmacol Sci 27:566–573
87. Shin H-J, Rho SB, Jung DC, Han I-O, Oh E-S, Kim J-Y (2011)
Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9) modulates tumor-associated cell
migration and invasion. J Cell Sci 124:1077–1087
88. Ivanov S, Liao S-Y, Ivanova A, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A,
Tarasova N, Weirich G, Merrill MJ, Proescholdt MA, Oldfield
EH, Lee J, Zavada J, Waheed A, Sly W, Lerman MI, Stanbridge
EJ (2011) Expression of hypoxia-inducible cell-surface transmembrane carbonic anhydrases in human cancer. Am J Pathol
158:905–919
89. Mabjeesh NJ, Escuin D, LaVallee TM, Pribluda VS, Swartz
GM, Johnson MS, Willard MT, Zhong H, Simons JW, Giannakakou P (2003) 2ME2 inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis
by disrupting microtubules and dysregulating HIF. Cancer Cell
3:363–375
90. Visagie MH, Birkholtz LM, Joubert AM (2014) 17-beta-estradiol analog inhibits cell proliferation by induction of apoptosis
in breast cell lines. Microsc Res Tech 77:236–242
91. Rebucci M, Michiels C (2013) Molecular aspects of cancer cell
resistance to chemotherapy. Biochem Pharmacol 85:1219–1226
92. Nobili S, Landini I, Mazzei T, Mini E (2012) Overcoming
tumor multidrug resistance using drugs able to evade P-glycoprotein or to exploit its expression. Med Res Rev 32:1220–1262
93. Wang F, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Chen Y, Zheng D, Hao L, Duan C,
Jia L, Liu G, Liu Y (2011) Synergistic effect of folate-mediated
targeting and verapamil-mediated P-gp inhibition with paclitaxel-polymer micelles to overcome multi-drug resistance. Biomaterials 32:9444–9456
94. Baguley BC (2010) Multiple drug resistance mechanisms in
cancer. Mol Biotechnol 46:308–316
95. Monzó M, Rosell R, Sánchez JJ, Lee JS, O’Brate A, GonzálezLarriba JL, Alberola V, Lorenzo JC, Núñez L, Ro JY, Martín C
13
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2015) 76:1101–1112
(1999) Paclitaxel resistance in non–small-cell lung cancer associated with beta-tubulin gene mutations. J Clin Oncol 17:1786
96. Anand S, Penrhyn-Lowe S, Venkitaraman AR (2003) AURORAA amplification overrides the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, inducing resistance to Taxol. Cancer Cell 3:51–62
97. Lee C, Dhillon J, Wang M, Gao Y, Hu K, Park E, Hung M-C,
Eirew P, Eaves C, Dunn S (2008) Targeting Y-box binding
protein-1 (YB-1) in Her-2 over-expressing breast cancer cells
induces apoptosis via the signal transducer and activator or
transcription-3 (STAT3) pathway and suppresses tumor growth.
Clin Cancer Res 14:A14
98. Lee CY-S (2007) Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) is essential
for the growth and survival of HER-2 over-expressing breast
cancer cells. Dissertation, University of British Columbia
99. Rexer BN, Arteaga CL (2012) Intrinsic and acquired resistance
to HER2-targeted therapies in HER2 gene-amplified breast
cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Crit Rev Oncog
17:1–16
100. Dong X, Xu P, Miao C, Fu Z, Li Q, Tang P, Wang T (2012)
Hypoxia decreased chemosensitivity of breast cancer cell line
MCF-7 to paclitaxel through cyclin B1. Biomed Pharmacother
66:70–75
101. Kanakkanthara A, Miller JH (2013) MicroRNAs: novel mediators of resistance to microtubule-targeting agents. Cancer Treat
Rev 39:161–170
102. Zhou M, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Ding Y, Liu H, Xi Y, Xiong W, Li G,
Lu J, Fodstad O, Riker AI, Tan M (2010) MicroRNA-125b confers the resistance of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel through
suppression of proapoptotic Bcl-2 antagonist killer 1 (Bak1)
expression. J Biol Chem 285:21496–21507
103. Skipper HE (1971) Kinetics of mammary tumor cell growth and
implications for therapy. Cancer 28:1479–1499
104. Kamb A (2005) What’s wrong with our cancer models? Nat Rev
Drug Discov 4:161–165
105. Meyer CJ, Krauth M, Wick MJ, Shay JW, Gellert G, De Brabander JK, Miller JH (2015) Peloruside A inhibits growth of
human lung and breast tumor xenografts in an athymic nu/nu
mouse model. Mol Cancer Ther 14:1816–1823
106. Liu JK, Towle MJ, Cheng HS, Saxton P, Reardon C, Wu JY, Littlefield BA (2007) In vitro and in vivo anticancer activities of
synthetic (−)-laulimalide, a marine natural product microtubule
stabilizing agent. Anticancer Res 27:1509–1518
107. Wolmarans E, Mqoco T, Stander A, Nkandeu S, Sippel K,
McKenna R, Joubert A (2014) Novel estradiol analogue induces
apoptosis and autophagy in esophageal carcinoma cells. Cell
Mol Biol Lett 19:98–115