← Back
Mononuclear η6-arene ruthenium(II) complexes with pyrazolyl-pyridazine ligands: synthesis, CT-DNA binding, reactivity towards glutathione, and cytotoxicity.
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-023-02043-7
ORIGINAL PAPER
Ultra‑crystalline pyroclastic deposits and rhyolitic lavas controlled
by crystal mushes: insights from the Acoculco Caldera Complex,
México
Mario E. Boijseauneau‑López1
Benjamin J. Andrews3
· Giovanni Sosa‑Ceballos2 · Gabriela A. Farfán3
· José Luis Macías2 ·
Received: 2 June 2022 / Accepted: 31 July 2023 / Published online: 20 August 2023
© The Author(s) 2023
Abstract
The Acoculco Caldera Complex (ACC), located in eastern Mexico, began its activity during the Pleistocene ~ 2.7 Ma. One
of the most relevant and largest rhyolitic eruption in the complex, the Piedras Encimadas Ignimbrite (PEI), occurred during
the late post-caldera phase at ~ 1.2 Ma. This ignimbrite is unique with respect to the other caldera products and other contemporaneous ignimbrites in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) because of its ultra-high crystallinity and the absence
of pumice fragments. The PEI is made almost entirely of crystals where the main constituents are k-feldspars and silica
polymorphs that range from ≤ 5 µm to tens of centimeters in size. XRD on bulk rock, geochemical modeling, FTIR, Raman,
and EPMA analyses were carried out in all mineral phases to assess the origin and the causes of high crystallinity within the
PEI. We interpret the high crystallinity on the basis of magmatic crystallization of a magma body that was remobilized and
altered by post-depositional hydrothermal alteration processes. We suggest that ACC rhyolites are geochemically influenced
by at least one crystal mush established during the Pleistocene. We suggest that the PEI could be the result of an erupted
crystal mush (melt + crystals), or a cumulate, or an ancient and crystallized reservoir generated after the first ACC collapse
due to intrusion or underplating of mafic hot magmas. Extensional episodes within the ACC facilitated the ascent of mafic
magmas. This interaction increased the liquid fraction of the mush through partial melting/crystal dissolution, generating a
drop in density and viscosity in the mush, thus triggering eruption. The PEI provides evidences for an association between
the geochemically-diverse ACC rhyolites with the complex interaction between mafic transitional alkaline magmas and a
crustal mush system, promoted by continuous changes in the stress field during the Pleistocene.
Keywords Crystal-Mush · Acoculco Caldera Complex · Piedras Encimadas Ignimbrite · Trydimite · Cristobalite ·
Hydrothermal Alteration · Geothermal Exploration
Introduction
Communicated by Gordon Moore.
* Mario E. Boijseauneau‑López
cswasa@gmail.com
1
Posgrado en Ciencias de la Tierra, Escuela Nacional
de Estudios Superiores, UNAM, Campus Morelia,
58190 Morelia Michoacán, México
2
Institute of Geophysics, UNAM, Campus Morelia, IGUM,
58190 Morelia Michoacán, Mexico
3
National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian
Institution, Washington D.C., USA
The origin and evolution of rhyolitic magmas have been
studied for decades (e.g. Whitney et al. 1989; Anderson
et al. 2000; Bindeman and Valley 2003; Hildreth and Wilson 2007; Bindeman 2008; Scaillet et al. 2016; Jolles and
Lange 2021; Clemens et al. 2022; Troch et al. 2022). Some
of the largest (VEI > 6) ignimbrites are typically associated with rhyolitic magmas, but generation of its evolved
magmas (regardless of the process, fractional crystallization or partial melting) involves segregation of meltrich, crystal-poor magma from a crystal-rich source—the
so-called crystal mush (Bachmann and Bergantz 2003,
2008a, b; Bachmann and Bergantz 2004a; Cashman
et al. 2017). However, the depths of magma production,
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
63 Page 2 of 24
extraction, final storage, and trigger mechanism of these
eruptions remain controversial (Bachmann et al. 2002;
Gottsmann et al. 2009; Malfait et al. 2014). It is widely
accepted that the segregation of melt-rich forms aphyric
rhyolitic magmas, crystal-poor magma from a crystal-rich
source (Gualda et al. 2019). However, previous studies
rarely have investigated if crystal-rich rhyolitic ignimbrites
could be associated with the remobilization and reactivation of melt-dominant bodies that had cooled and crystallized close to the point of critical crystallinity or rheological lock-up at > ~ 50 vol.% of crystals (Marsh 1981;
Brophy 1991; Vigneresse et al. 1996; Huber et al. 2010;
Petford 2003); that is, the mobilization of a crystal mush
including melt + crystals. Only, crystal-rich monotonous
intermediates and aphyric rhyolitic ignimbrites have been
stated as result of the activity of a crystal mushes (e.g.,
Hildreth 1981; Bachmann and Bergantz 2004a and 2008b;
Hildreth and Wilson 2007; Blundy and Cashman 2008;
Cashman and Giordano 2014; Zhang et al. 2018; Giordano
and Caricchi 2022). Even more difficult to interpret are
the cases of volcanic complexes with different ignimbrite
types (crystal rich and crystal poor) and a series of rhyolitic lavas with no clear relationship to a crystal mush
nor to a classical ignimbrite generation model. Crystalrich, pumice-free ignimbrites with > 70 vol% crystals are
sparsely described in the literature. This type of rhyolitic
ignimbrites already has been interpreted as part of caldera eruptions related with a crystal mush; however, their
origins are not fully understood (e.g., Sohn et al. 2009;
Zhang et al. 2018).
The Acoculco Caldera Complex (ACC) in eastern Mexico (Fig. 1a) is an excellent case study because it hosts
a great variety of rhyolites, comprising a syn-collapse
ignimbrite, a series of annular rhyolitic domes (located
in the rim of the caldera), and two post-collapse ignimbrites related to large eruptions triggered by local tectonics (Avellán et al. 2019, 2020). Furthermore, the ACC
has pervasive hydrothermal alteration features distributed
inside and outside the caldera, fumaroles, and hot spring
waters. It is well documented how hydrothermalism generates alteration of the rocks in which the fluid circulation
modifies the natural paragenesis and crystallinity through
mineral chemical and structural modifications, as well as
the precipitation of new mineral phases or the replacement
of others (i.e., Schwartz 1959; Browne 1978; Giggenbach 1984; Kimball 1990; Mathieu 2018). The Piedras
Encimadas Ignimbrite (PEI), the biggest felsic eruption
reported in the ACC, is the first crystal-rich rhyolitic volcanic deposit described in Mexico. Due to its high crystal
contents, we will examine if the hydrothermal alteration
reported in the ACC changes the crystallinity or if the minerals are product of magmatic crystallization. Moreover,
this study has broader applications for the understanding
13
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
of how crystal-rich deposits are produced and may help to
determine the conditions in which a crystal mush model
is applicable.
Here we characterize the geochemical, mineralogical, and
trace element record of the PEI post-collapse ignimbrite and
other felsic products of the ACC (Fig. 1b). We also propose
a new model to understand the evolution of the ACC plumbing system and magmatism. This model links the different
erupted compositions to a coherent differentiation scheme
and is compatible with a process of crystal mush remobilization that controls the compositional variation within the
ACC.
Geologic setting
The ACC is located on the eastern part of the Trans-Mexican
Volcanic Belt (TMBV) (Fig. 1a). This volcanic arc is the
product of the subduction of the Cocos and Rivera oceanic
plates underneath the North American continental plate
(Pardo and Suarez 1995; Gómez-Tuena et al. 2018). The
local basement beneath the ACC region is formed by Cretaceous limestones (Avellán et al. 2019; López-Hernández
et al. 2009), metamorphosed by a series of granitic intrusions of unknown age. Our knowledge of the local basement is the result of two exploratory wells performed by
the Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE, the National
Electricity Company). In addition to the metamorphic and
sedimentary rocks, there are a series of aplitic dikes-sills
(183 ± 36 ka, Avellán et al. 2019) and lava flows with basaltic
andesitic and andesitic compositions (García-Palomo et al.
2018). Regional changes in stress orientations during the
Miocene created a normal fault system with a NW–SE trend
(García-Palomo et al. 2018; Gómez-Alvarez et al. 2021).
This deformation in the southernmost part of the ACC zone
developed to form the Tlaxco NW–SE fault system (GómezAlvarez et al. 2021). During the Pliocene–Pleistocene, the
local stress changed, generating new normal fault systems in
the Apan-Acoculco area with NW–SE orientations (GarcíaPalomo et al. 2018). This structural system dominated
until the late Pleistocene when the fault system orientation
changed to NE–SW, producing graben-horst structures such
as the Apan, Tlaxco-Chignauapan grabens, and the RosarioAcoculco horst (García-Palomo et al. 2002, 2018).
Volcanic activity at the ACC started at 2.7 Ma and has
been continuous until 0.016 Ma (Avellán et al. 2020). The
volcanic evolution of the ACC was characterized by Avellán et al. (2019) into the categories syn-caldera, early postcaldera, late post-caldera, and extra-caldera units. The precaldera volcanism of the ACC comprises andesitic-dacitic
domes; the syn-caldera stage generated the Acoculco
andesitic ignimbrite (~ 2.7 Ma) and the first collapse of the
region (Avellán et al. 2019). The collapse modified the local
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Page 3 of 24 63
Fig. 1 a Location of the Acoculco Caldera Complex (ACC) within
the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB). b Simplified geological map of the ACC, after Sosa-Ceballos et al. (2018) and Avellán
et al. (2019). The map contains the distribution of the basement rocks
as limestones (Ksl), Peñuela and Quexnol (Mv), and the volcanic
units; pre-caldera volcanism (Pc), syn-caldera volcanism (Sc), early
post-caldera volcanism (Epc), late post-caldera volcanism (Lpc), and
Extra-caldera volcanism (ATVF). The red lines represent the faults
in the area after Calcagno et al. (2019) that form normal faults (NE–
SW) and graben–horst structures. The localization of PEI samples is
showed by a black mark on the map (modified from Pérez-Orózco
et al. 2021)
stress field and promoted the ascent of peralkaline rhyolites
mixed with calc-alkaline magmas (Sosa-Ceballos et al. 2018;
Avellán et al. 2019). The post-caldera stage is characterized
by bimodal volcanism: first with voluminous mafic rocks of
the early post-caldera volcanism (2.6–2.2 Ma) followed by
the late post-caldera volcanism (2–1 Ma), which comprised
a series of rhyolitic domes, the PEI (Fig. 1b), Tecoloquillo
ignimbrite (Avellán et al. 2020), and, finally, with a series of
minor Quaternary monogenetic eruptions of mafic composition. The most voluminous episodes of rhyolitic volcanism
within the ACC area are represented by the PEI (Fig. 1b)
and the Tecoloquillo ignimbrite. PEI is a welded ignimbrite
with several flow units that appear as massive, light-gray to
white, beds (Avellán et al. 2019, 2020). Each bed consists
of microcrystalline matrix-supported particles with feldspar
and quartz phenocrysts. It has an approximated volume of 26
km3 (Avellán et al. 2020). The PEI represents caldera reactivation at 1.2 Ma, and its volcanic center was probably at the
eastern portion of the ACC ring structure (López-Hernández
et al. 2009; Avellán et al. 2020). The Later, another explosive
13
63 Page 4 of 24
eruption occurred at ∼ 0.8 Ma at the south part of the caldera
producing the Tecoloquillo rhyolitic ignimbrite and its summit dome (Avellán et al. 2019). Pérez-Orozco et al. (2021)
reveal that Tecoloquillo products show evidence of magma
mixing between calc-alkaline and peralkaline melts. Furthermore, melt inclusions suggest that two magma bodies,
located approximately 6–10 km in-depth and, isolated from
one another, sourced the eruption (Pérez-Orozco et al. 2021).
Older felsic products in the region are represented by the
Peñuela Dacitic Dome Complex (~ 13–10 Ma) and Terrerillos Domes (~ 3 Ma) (García-Palomo et al. 2002; Avellán
et al. 2019, 2020). It is not clear if magmatism is continuous between the Peñuelas and Terrerillos Dome complexes;
however, felsic products are present in the late post-caldera
units (~ 2–0.016 Ma) forming lava flows and domes with
predominant rhyolitic compositions (Avellán et al. 2019,
2020). In addition, during the formation of the ACC, mafic
volcanism (2.4–0.19 Ma) related to the Apan-Tezontepec
Volcanic Field (ATVF) is interbedded with the products of
the ACC and correspond to the extra-caldera stage (GarcíaPalomo et al. 2002, 2018; López-Hernández et al. 2009;
Avellán et al. 2019).
The interest in exploring the ACC region arose in the
1980s with prospective works carried out by the Mexican
Federal Electricity Commission (CFE, for its acronym in
Spanish) to determine its geothermal potential. Despite the
hydrothermal alteration being the most outstanding feature
of most ACC deposits (Canet et al. 2015), there are few spots
of superficial geothermal manifestations such as springs and
fumaroles (Lopez-Hernandez and Castillo-Hernandez 1997).
The alteration features are reported for an area of several
square km in the center of the caldera complex, and outside,
in the eastern border, affecting pyroclastic deposits, and, to
a lesser degree, lavas (Canet et al. 2015; Sánchez-Córdova
et al. 2020; Pandarinath et al. 2020). Inside the caldera, the
most common hydrothermal alteration is the silicic type.
There are some regions where acid-sulfate alteration types
can be found (vuggy silica and advanced argillic alterations);
however, outside of the caldera, the hydrothermal alteration
has no studies.
Methods
We collected bulk rock samples (comprising crystals and
matrix) from the bottom, middle, and top portions. We study
four sections of the PEI in proximal and distant deposits in
gullies of the western caldera borders (Fig. 1b). The field
strategy consisted of sampling the deposit based on vertical
variations. Samples were crushed and hand-picked to obtain
lithic-free fragments for analysis. Whole-rock analysis of
major and trace element concentrations were determined by
fusion inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy
13
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
(ICP-ES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
(ICP-MS) at the Activation Laboratories, Ancaster, Canada
(https://actlabs.com/). Fifteen rock samples were cut and
processed into thin polished sections for petrographic and
electron microprobe analysis (EPMA).
To investigate how hydrothermal alteration could modify
the crystallinity of the PEI deposits, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray
diffraction (XRD) were carried out on mineral samples and
on the matrix of different samples. On each sample (bottom,
middle top), we realize 1 XRD analysis, more than 35 FTIR
analysis and more than 30 Raman analysis per each thin section. FTIR analyses were performed with a Thermo Scientific apparatus at the Laboratorio de Microanálisis, CEMIEGeo UNAM. Micro-FTIR analyses were measured with 512
scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and were collected using a
KBr beam splitter. The sample was placed on a water-free
KBr base for support, and the background scan and sample
analyses were taken through the KBr base under the same
analytical conditions. Micro-FTIR analyses were obtained
over a wavelength range of 5000–600 cm−1, with a liquidnitrogen cooled HgCdTe2 (MCT) detector and an aperture
set at 10 μm square. This provided a strong intensity and
detector response for the mid-IR water absorbance bands.
Raman analyses were performed with a Thermo Scientific
DXR apparatus at the Laboratorio de Microanálisis, CEMIEGeo UNAM. Raman measurements were carried out in the
matrix and minerals of all the PEI deposits. Raman analyses
were measured with a 532 nm laser over a wavelength range
of 3568–20 cm−1, at a resolution of 1.7–2.7 cm−1, with a
50 µm aperture and 8.8 mV of laser power.
Mineral compositions were determined for a representative subset of the PEI samples. Major-element compositions
of plagioclase and Fe-Ti oxides were acquired using a JEOL
JXA-8230 electron microprobe housed at the Laboratorio
de Microanálisis, CEMIE-Geo UNAM. Analytical conditions were 15 keV accelerating voltage and 10 nA current
for major elements and 15 keV and 20 nA for selected trace
elements; a focused beam was used in both cases. A defocused electron beam of 10 µm was used to analyze glass
groundmass to avoid Na migration. Analytic uncertainties
in EPMA were determined with secondary standards with
a variety of minerals and glasses. Standards were analyzed
throughout each analytical session to monitor instrument
drift and correct compositional offsets.
Mineral phase identification was achieved using powder
X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a Rigaku D/MAX-Rapid microX-ray diffractometer at the Smithsonian National Museum of
Natural History Department of Mineral Sciences, EUA. The
instrument uses Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71069 Å) and collects data on a 2D imaging plate detector with Debye–Scherrer geometry. Sample powders were gently re-ground in an
agate mortar and pestle and were mounted in 1 µm-wide
Page 5 of 24 63
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Kapton capillaries. The samples were run for 10 min each
with omega fixed at 0° and phi rotating at 1°/second. Three
sample replicates were collected for each sample by focusing
the X-ray beam on three different regions of the powderfilled capillary. XRD image files were background-corrected
(manual setting = 4) and integrated into intensity vs 2θ patterns from 4.0 to 45.0 2θ degrees and 81.6337–430.00 β
using 2DP software.
Mineral phases in our samples were initially identified
using the search/match function of Jade (2021) (Materials
Data, Inc.) with the PDF-4 2021 ICDD database. Contributions of mineral phases in each of the different samples
(represented as phase percentages and weight percentages) were estimated via whole pattern Rietveld refinement
analyses using GSASII software (Toby and Von Dreele
2013; Post and Bish 1989). The background was modeled using a Chebyschev polynomial. Anorthoclase [(Al,
Si3) (Na0.667K0.333) O8; Harlow 1982], quartz (Antao et al.
2008), cristobalite (Downs and Palmer 1994), tridymite with
a monoclinic structure (Hirose et al. 2005), and tridymite
with an orthorhombic structure (Lee and Xu 2019) were
used as model structures. Although there are likely other
feldspar phases present, our focus was to identify and quantify the tridymite and cristobalite phases in these samples.
We selected anorthoclase as a single representative feldspar
in this system to minimize the number of phases in the Rietveld refinement. Errors in phase estimates represent standard
deviations in measurements between the three replicates.
Given the mush-like nature of the PEI deposits, we tested
with a geochemical model (Fig. 13) if rhyolites have a relationship with melt extracts produced in a crystal mush, probably peralkaline in composition, or if these rocks are not
affected by the crystal mush. We chose to perform partial
melt models because most authors, regardless of the tectonic
context in which volcanism occurs, show that partial melt
episodes can occur in the cumulate part of crystal mushes
(Foley et al. 2020 and cites therein). This can be promoted
by the flow of volatiles and heat coming, in general, from
some mafic-intrusive melts in the base of the cumulate portion of the mush (Bachmann et al. 2002; Deering et al. 2011;
Foley et al. 2020; Lubbers et al. 2020; Pamukcu et al. 2013;
Sliwinski et al. 2017; Szymanowski et al. 2017; Tavazzani
et al. 2020). The process above described eventually triggers
the mobilization of the crystal mush.
For the model, we assume the following: (i) the mush
extracts behave like a partial melt, (ii) PEI deposits represent the eruption of a portion of a crystal mush (partial
melts + crystals), (iii) we use different granitic rock compositions for the model because a crystal mush can spawn
from the crystallization of a magma body or by the partial melting of a pre-existing crystallized body in any tectonic setting. However, we choose the chemical composition of a xenolith of an intrusive granitic rock reported by
Sosa-Ceballos et al. (2018) and PEI as a proxy of the partial melting source that produce the melt extracts; (iv) the
injection of hot mafic magma promotes the partial melting
but lead to produce a minimal chemical interaction with the
mush and unevenly distributed thermal flux (Foley et al.
2020); (v) we consider the multiple crystal mush scenario,
hosted in different portions of the upper crust. Due to the
geochemical modeling complexity, we decided to explore
partial melting as a process that could occur in one crystal
mush. To run the model, we consider the partial melting
of the granitic proxy in a range of F = 0.05–0.45 (5–45%)
for the xenolith sample, F = 0.1–1(0.1,0.15,0.2, …,1) for
the PEI sample; we used a paragenesis of 0.45 K-Fls + 0.35
Plg + 0.10 Qz + 0.05Opx + 0.05Cpx for the xenolith sample
and 0.45 K-Fls + 0.35 Qz + 0.10 Plg + 0.05Opx + 0.05Cpx
for the PEI model. We used distribution coefficients of some
REE, Rb and Zr in mineral phases published by Rollinson
(2014) with the equation Cl = C0/ (F + (D(1-F)).
Results
The PEI deposits, like most of the ACC rhyolitic deposits, are dispersed in the outer zone of the caldera (Fig. 1b).
The PEI is massive, gray white, and crystal rich (Fig. 2).
The maximum observed thickness is ~ 100 m, and deposits
are generally welded at the bottom and more friable toward
the top (Fig. 2b, c). The contact between the local basement and the base of the deposit, or the lag breccia, does
not crop out around the ACC, although Avellán et al. (2019)
and López-Hernández et al. (2009) suggest that the eastern
border of the caldera was the emission point of the PEI. The
deposits are composed almost entirely of microphenocrysts
and phenocrysts (~ 1% vol of crystal with sizes > 15 cm) of
alkali feldspar, quartz, plagioclase, and Fe-Ti oxides (Fig. 3
a, b, c, d) with a crystal content up to ~ 90 wt. % in welded
portions and ~ 60 wt. % in friable deposits (Fig. 3). Neither
pumice, glass chips, nor lithic fragments are found within
the deposits. Portions of the deposit appear to contain an
ashy matrix (Fig. 2 d), but the matrix comprises aggregates
of quartz and feldspar with sizes > 5 µm, as observed in the
welded portion (Fig. 3). The friable portion of the PEI has
portions with argillic hydrothermal alteration (Fig. 2a). This
alteration was reported by Canet et al. (2015) in the inner
part of the caldera.
The PEI is rhyolitic in bulk rock composition and has
slight internal vertical chemical variations (Fig. 4, Table 1)
The compositions of the PEI sample become more silicic
and exhibit a decrease in Fe2O3 and MgO toward the top
of the deposit. We analyzed unaltered samples with LOI
values below 1 wt. %. Trace element concentrations normalized to the primitive mantle (Sun and McDonough 1989)
show negative anomalies of Ba, Nb, Ta, U, Th, K, and Zr,
13
63 Page 6 of 24
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Fig. 2 Photographs showing the
PEI field features of the deposit:
a The non-welded top of the
deposit, b The welded middle
part of the deposit, c welded
bottom part of the deposit, and
d a cm-scale feldspar phenocryst
and a positive anomaly of Pb, Sr, Eu, P, and Ti. Furthermore, heavy rare earth elements (HREE) present a horizontal trend and light rare earth elements (LREE) are more
enriched than HREE (Fig. 5). These anomalies and trace
element concentrations are also present in the other felsic
members of ACC such as Tecoloquillo ignimbrite (TQ) and
xenolith fragments of granitic composition reported by SosaCeballos et al. (2018). The xenolith fragment may come
from felsic intrusions associated with the ACC magmatic
system. Felsic intrusions are reported by CFE exploratory
drilling in the region, where they are described as aplitic
dikes. ACC's pyroclastic and lava felsic products show low
Eu/Eu* ≤ 0.3 and low Ba < 500 ppm (Fig. 6b, e). Moreover,
these rocks show a positive trend in Ba/Rb vs Rb, Rb vs
La, low #MgO (1–16), and a wide range in the La/Sm vs
La diagrams (Fig. 6d). The composition of rhyolites in the
ACC is diverse but can be distinguished between A-type and
calc-alkaline I-Type rhyolites as a result of the analysis of
Zr + Nb + Y + Ce and trace elements (Fig. 6a). Calc-alkaline
rhyolites tend to have higher Ba/Sr and lower La/Yb ratios
and higher abundances of HFSE and HREE than A-type
rhyolites (Fig. 6a).
The larger phenocrysts of feldspar are average 1 cm in
size (but can exceed 15 cm in length; Fig. 2d) and have
13
subhedral broken shapes (Fig. 3a). Microphenocrysts and
phenocrysts show disequilibrium features such as exsolution textures, rounded borders, and resorbed rims (Fig. 3c,
d). Furthermore, all the PEI deposits show relics of mafic
minerals. Feldspar phenocrysts have anorthoclase and sanidine compositions with 2–8 mol% An and 20–78 mol%
Or, whereas the matrix is formed by orthoclase and microcline (Fig. 9). XRD and Raman analyses, however, show
that phenocrysts in the samples have an anorthoclase
structure (Figs. 10, 11). Oxides in the PEI deposits are
ferropseudobrookite–ilmenite and ulvospinel–wustite.
Furthermore, oxides display variations of FeO, Fe2O3, and
TiO2 from the center to the rim of the phenocrysts (Supplementary material). Core to rim transects in oxides show
Fe enrichment with Ti depletion (Fig. 8).
The composition of the PEI matrix samples exhibits
a mixture of quartz and felspar (Fig. 10a). EPMA imaging and compositional analysis of the PEI samples reveals
that the matrix is composed of microcrystalline texture
(< 5 µm) of quartz and feldspar with, 6–13 wt. % of
Na2O + K2O (Fig. 7, 8, 9). FTIR spectroscopy shows primarily anorthoclase and quartz crystals with no hydroxy
or water structural defects in the 3000–3800 cm−1 bands.
Page 7 of 24 63
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Fig. 3 Photomicrographs of four PEI samples in cross-polarized
light. a The mineral assemblage formed by phenocrysts of feldspar
and quartz and a groundmass formed by tridymite and cristobalite
crystals; b The few plagioclase phenocrysts often have disequilib-
rium textures, such as rounded borders and sieve texture; c a feldspar
phenocryst with exsolution texture and rounded borders; d a feldspar
phenocryst with rounded borders and twining
Rietveld refinements of X-ray diffraction patterns
(Fig. 10a) estimate the relative contribution of different
mineral phases outlined in Table 2. Anorthoclase and
quartz dominate, as expected, with smaller contributions
of cristobalite and tridymite as monoclinic and orthorhombic phases. Cristobalite is not present in PE1904.
Orthorhombic tridymite is present in sample AC100. Due
to the absence of clay minerals and glass in the XRD patterns, we use the results of Rietveld refinements as a proxy
of %vol for each sample (Table 2).
Discussion
Matrix‑free deposits: a hydrothermal fingerprint
The PEI deposits contain microcrysts of quartz, cristobalite, and tridymite as confirmed in FTIR and Raman
analysis (Fig. 11a, b). Likewise, XRD measurements show
crystal structures of polymorphs of silica (Fig. 10). These
mineral phases are related to hydrothermal alteration and
13
63 Page 8 of 24
Fig. 4 Total alkali vs silica diagram of the Acoculco Caldera Complex (ACC, red field) rocks, PE = Piedras Encimadas Ignimbrite simples, Tc = Tecoloquillo ignimbrite, Xen = xenolith, blue cross symbols represent G1, and diamond symbols represents G2 rhyolite ACC
lavas of the early and late post-caldera events
are reported in other deposits in the inner portion of the
ACC (Canet et al. 2015; Sánchez-Córdova et al. 2020).
In the less crystalline portions of the PEI, the content of
quartz, cristobalite, and tridymite aggregates can reach
40–50 vol% in the welded portions at the bottom part of
the deposit. Additionally, to the top of the deposit, crystals are supported by a cryptocrystalline matrix formed
by silica polymorphs (Fig. 2a). Thus, we suggest that late
hydrothermal alteration affected the deposits even in the
external parts of the caldera. Syn- and post-depositional
alteration of primary volcanic deposits with the formation
of clay minerals have been observed in pyroclastic surge
deposits, e.g., at Vulcano, Italy (Capaccioni and Coniglio
1995) and El Chichón, México (Macías et al. 1997). However, we do not have clay minerals. This evidence could
suggest that the matrix-free nature of the welded portion
of the PEI deposits could be produced by hydrothermal
alteration.
One of the pending questions to be resolved is how the
SiO2 polymorphs of the PEI were formed and in which
pressure and temperature conditions. Cristobalite and
tridymite crystals commonly precipitate at low pressures up to ∼0.4 GPa and temperatures between 870 °C
and 1470 °C, but these minerals also exist as metastable
phases at lower temperature conditions (Kihara et al. 1986;
Heaney et al. 1994); Deer et al. 2004). Tridymite crystals
tend to exhibit a hexagonal structure above ~ 380 °C with
slight distortions of the Si–O–Si bond angles and Si–O
bond length (Kihara et al. 1986). Between 380 °C and
110 °C, tridymite recrystallizes to form an orthorhombic
structure, and below 110 °C, monoclinic tridymite is ubiquitous (Heaney et al. 1994). All the PEI deposits contain
sharp, well-defined XRD peaks of monoclinic (Fig. 10)
tridymite and cristobalite. However, orthorhombic
13
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
tridymite is only clearly present in samples AC100 and
PE-1902 (Fig. 11). AC100 is located in the SW border of
ACC near the topographic rim described by Sosa-Ceballos
et al. (2018). Therefore, orthorhombic tridymite found in
the PEI deposits could suggest that hydrothermal fluids
circulated and reached temperatures up to 110 °C and
that these fluids promoted the devitrification process of
the deposits. Furthermore, the wüstite composition of the
Fe-Ti oxides (Fig. 8) suggest hydrothermal alteration process. Wüstite minerals are reported in hydrothermal veins
formed in low fugacity conditions or during the exsolution of pre-existing oxides (Nadoll and Mauk 2011), as
observed in S-type granites where the exsolution of oxides
should occur during the partial melting of metapelitic
rocks (Seifert et al. 2010).
The devitrification of rhyolitic pyroclastic rocks is a
relatively common process, resulting in the production of
microcrystalline silica and feldspars from the fast emplaced
and slow cooling deposits (Rowe et al. 2012) and by postdepositional hydrothermal circulation. These chemical alteration processes lead to mass fluxes of elements, both from
the altered glass into solution and vice versa, as it has been
also reported in mafic rocks from the ocean floor (Furnes
1978); Zhou and Fyfe 1989; Crovisier et al. 1992; Stroncik and Schmincke 2001; Walton et al. 2003; Pauly et al.
2011). In ACC, this process was studied and quantified by
Sánchez-Córdova et al. (2020). As a result of the hydrothermal alteration process, the supersaturation of fluids causes
the precipitation of neoformation minerals (Hay and Iijima
1968; Ibrahim and Hall 1996; Stroncik and Schmincke 2001;
Kousehlar et al. 2012) such as the tridymite and cristobalite
observed in the PEI samples (Fig. 7a). Furthermore, the
silicification was well-studied in the central ACC (SánchezCórdova et al. 2020). The alteration processes are, thus,
pervasive and likely affect the matrix to a greater degree
because of the devitrification process after emplacement of
the pyroclastic density currents. Feldspars do not show signs
of alteration such as albitization (despite of low %Or), a
distinct reddening, relicts of its ancient feldspar/plagioclase
compositions and/or the absence of micrometric/nanometric
pores containing white mica (Engvik et al. 2008), alteration to sericite, zeolites, or other typical alteration minerals
(Figs. 10, 11). Thus, the pre-existing ash matrix of the PEI
could be transformed to tridymite + cristobalite + K-feldspars
(Rowe et al. 2012), as it was observed in the XRD, Raman,
FTIR, and EPMA maps (Fig. 7, 10, 11). If this is true, the
hypothetical glass (pumice fragments) or matrix (formed by
fine ash particles) content could reach less than 40% vol of
deposits, as is observed in petrography and quantified by
Rietveld refinement of XRD patterns (Table 2). Thus, given
the pervasive hydrothermal alteration described in the ACC,
we propose the matrix was replaced by secondary minerals.
Such replacement processes have been described in other
13.73
Pyroclast
76.91
Type
SiO2
5.19
20
2
2.1
11.8
Cs
29.8
31.3
7
Nb
Mo
Sn
37.3
439
47.4
181
Y
Zr
Sb
15
207
30
Rb
Sr
2.5
0.8
3
3
128
<5
1.8
2.3
18
Ge
22
As
40
24
S
Ga
4
21
7
55
Cu
Zn
3
1
5
Co
30
Cr
5
99.4
Ni
6
V
2
2
6
Sc
6
#MgO
Be
3
101
Total
0.03
0.26
0.02
0.25
P2O5
0.23
0.013
LOI
4.78
0.179
K2O
0.19
4.6
0.44
3.92
CaO
Na2O
TiO2
0.03
0.04
0.11
MnO
MgO
0.10
0.87
0.18
1.60
Fe2O3
0.97
596,510
1278
1278 ± 14
FeO
12.53
2,192,035
North
1.78
586,067
East
Al2O3
Pyroclast
74.15
611
Age (Ma)
Fe2O3(T)
2,204,497
611 ± 72
Age Ma
Lpc
PEIAc100
Ec
TQ-Ac12
Units
Sample
1.4
0.8
3
2
35.5
425
34.9
17
118
1.4
22
0.006
18
2
1
9
4
4
2
99.21
0.82
0.245
5.15
4.49
0.22
0.02
0.01
0.83
0.09
0.92
14.46
72.86
Pyroclast
2,204,605
599,601
1278
1278 ± 14
PEI-1902
Lpc
1.8
1
4
2
36.8
403
40.4
17
126
1.6
20
0.029
54
2
6
5
5
1
100.4
0.91
0.05
0.227
5.04
4.34
0.23
0.03
0.017
1.93
0.22
2.15
13.38
73.99
Pyroclast
2,203,900
597,037
1278
1278 ± 14
PEI-1904
Lpc
6.2
1.2
6
7
30.7
232
60.7
27
202
14
1.9
22
20
56
6
2
38
6
7
3
7
99.76
2.83
0.02
0.178
5.18
3.48
0.55
0.12
0.042
1.45
0.16
1.61
12.56
73.2
Lava
2,194,317
582,915
Ac7
Ec
5.1
1.2
5
8
29.2
160
42.7
8
164
13
2.2
20
40
49
3
1
27
6
3
4
100.2
0.51
0.01
0.135
5.06
3.69
0.38
0.08
0.049
1.60
0.18
1.78
11.86
76.62
Lava
2,208,919
574,826
2553
2553 ± 110
Ac90
Epc
2.3
0.5
2
4
26.4
302
27
75
143
6
1.7
22
60
46
2
12
12
4
4
11
98.86
1.14
0.337
4.56
3.98
0.67
0.24
0.059
1.89
0.21
2.1
13.81
71.98
Lava
2,213,875
590,387
1438
1438 ± 24
Ac107
Lpc
4.1
0.8
4
7
28.3
196
51.1
21
162
9
1.8
21
60
53
22
5
6
3
6
100.8
0.62
0.178
5.07
3.92
0.41
0.09
0.052
1.21
0.13
1.34
12.86
76.27
Lava
2,212,926
588,634
Ac108
Lpc
2.7
0.5
4
2
31.9
500
52.6
2
171
6
1.9
22
50
73
2
31
5
5
2
99.77
0.48
0.21
4.73
4.19
0.08
0.05
0.039
1.93
0.21
2.14
11.96
75.88
Lava
2,196,999
584,295
1870
1870 ± 36
Ac113
Lpc
Lpc
100.1
4
4
0.6
3.9
3.9
3
7
27.5
324
40.5
88
138
7
1.7
21
40
69
7
3
18
12
5
0.9
3
4
26.8
324
43.1
91
133
7
1.8
22
30
60
1
70
12
5
16
99.32
12
2.97
0.07
0.362
4.62
4.03
1.04
0.38
0.076
1.99
0.22
2.21
13.21
71.13
Lava
2,200,734
576,764
1700
1700 ± 400
Ac35
0.37
0.07
0.355
4.42
4.24
0.95
0.29
0.09
2.02
0.23
2.25
13.58
72.7
Lava
2,210,789
589,651
1300
1300 ± 600
Ac115
Lpc
5.1
1.3
6
9
30.7
185
44.6
7
174
13
2.2
21
20
52
10
4
2
6
3
5
100.9
3.58
0.01
0.139
5.71
2.87
0.36
0.07
0.046
1.29
0.14
1.43
11.55
75.08
Pyroclast
2,199,284
575,914
1084
1084 ± 22
Ac37
Lpc
1.3
0.4
3
4
33.1
499
42.6
122
121
1.8
24
30
72
3
2
7
11
4
6
5
99.15
1.18
0.05
0.471
4.44
4.73
0.66
0.12
0.038
2.28
0.25
2.53
14.88
70.04
Lava
2,205,382
588,654
1600
1600 ± 100
Ac51
Lpc
Table 1 Major and trace geochemistry of ACC samples. Error for major elements is ~ 0.01 wt% and trace elements ~ 1 ppm in average
Lpc
3.5
0.6
3
4
18.5
227
27.2
52
150
6
1.6
20
20
46
2
2
6
6
3
3
2
99.72
1.44
0.02
0.24
4.67
4.01
0.47
0.04
0.028
1.42
0.16
1.58
14.22
73.01
Lava
2,204,474
581,401
1400
1400 ± 200
Ac56
Lpc
4.4
0.7
4
7
25.4
168
44.6
11
164
11
2
21
20
51
2
2
14
6
2
3
100.6
2.82
0.01
0.143
5.46
3.2
0.34
0.04
0.048
1.13
0.13
1.26
12.58
74.7
Lava
2,199,502
578,889
1283
1283 ± 88
Ac72
Lpc
5.2
1.3
6
9
34.3
271
53.4
4
165
15
2.1
21
20
60
5
3
1
7
3
3
100.7
3.67
0.135
5.27
3.32
0.31
0.05
0.048
1.55
0.17
1.72
11.46
74.71
Lava
2,190,307
595,629
1145
1145 ± 14
Ac82
Lpc
2.5
0.2
3
5
28.5
446
87.9
74
145
7
1.5
22
40
58
4
2
22
19
5
5
3
100.1
1.93
0.22
0.385
4.44
4.04
0.56
0.08
0.045
2.63
0.29
2.92
13.24
72.19
Lava
2,208,434
572,356
1066
1066 ± 42
Ac89
Lpc
3.4
1
3
3
27.2
181
54.9
21
151
9
1.9
21
30
47
3
2
20
5
2
5
99.72
0.67
0.02
0.182
4.96
3.67
0.3
0.08
0.051
1.30
0.14
1.44
12.99
75.36
Lava
2,213,879
583,057
1360
1,360 ± 15
Ac92
Epc
3.1
0.2
20.4
136
38.6
19
136
1.2
15
30
42
<1
2
54
6
4
2
7
99.66
1.14
0.01
0.126
3.09
2.52
0.3
0.09
0.023
1.10
0.12
1.22
8.02
83.11
Xen
2,197,201
584,862
Ac112
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Page 9 of 24 63
13
13
11.4
3.97
0.33
16
13.2
4.42
6.77
1.27
3.5
0.37
16
19.1
6.23
7.18
W
Tl
Pb
Th
U
Eu*
9.3
1.9524
Ta/U PM
0.2885
0.2787
8.4881
Ta*
Nb/Th PM
0.2660
0.5441
0.1931
Ta/U
Nb*
1.9524
8.4881
0.5633
2.2576
0.64
1.6387
Ba/Rb
Nb/Th
2.1
2.49
5.5
3.39
Hf
0.66
4.59
0.69
6.43
Ta
5.59
0.79
Yb
Lu
4.89
0.845
Er
Tm
1.35
7.55
1.59
Dy
Ho
5.82
1.03
6.1
1.2
Gd
0.44
7.6
40.3
Tb
8.12
0.374
Sm
Eu
13.6
45
Pr
52
108
65.3
125
La
Ce
Nd
163
133
Ba
Lpc
PEIAc100
Ec
TQ-Ac12
Sample
Table 1 (continued)
Units
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3319
0.3009
0.6480
2.5540
1.69
5.36
3.92
13.9
14
0.27
1.1
2.54
10.7
0.655
3.95
0.585
3.49
1.12
5.48
0.85
4.88
0.543
5.8
28.5
8.07
68.7
35.8
200
PEI-1902
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3359
0.3097
0.6559
2.6286
1.21
7.59
4.01
14
16
0.36
1.2
2.63
9.8
0.726
4.39
0.643
4.09
1.44
7.14
1.14
6.82
0.434
8.29
43.2
12.2
100
52.8
152
PEI-1904
Ec
1.9524
8.4881
0.3272
0.1739
0.6388
1.4760
0.65
8.59
6.09
20.8
17
1.23
373
3.89
7.1
1.02
6.7
0.991
6.25
1.98
9.72
1.5
8.37
0.352
8.8
45.5
13.3
121
64.1
131
Ac7
Epc
1.9524
8.4881
0.2984
0.2098
0.5826
1.7805
0.45
6.68
5.51
16.4
15
0.72
252
3.21
5
0.69
4.88
0.738
4.2
1.39
6.71
1.08
5.73
0.229
7.51
40.7
11.8
110
58.3
74
Ac90
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3430
0.1932
0.6696
1.6398
3.01
4.67
4.48
16.1
17
0.97
84
3
7.7
0.507
3.21
0.475
2.94
0.89
4.71
0.75
4.25
1.02
5.06
25.8
7.41
89.5
37.7
430
Ac107
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3475
0.2045
0.6785
1.7362
1.44
8.00
4.79
16.3
14
0.91
233
3.25
6.1
0.797
5.17
0.795
5.06
1.63
8.4
1.27
7.51
0.642
8.47
43.4
12.3
110
62
233
Ac108
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3589
0.2306
0.7006
1.9571
0.23
9.38
4.81
16.3
25
0.71
254
3.37
12.5
0.956
6.29
0.874
5.8
1.87
9.9
1.56
8.91
0.375
9.83
52.3
14.8
116
66.7
39
Ac113
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3088
0.2133
0.6029
1.8108
3.78
7.69
4.81
14.8
17
0.63
12.1
2.9
7.9
0.717
4.66
0.694
4.42
1.46
7.16
1.16
7.12
1.2
8.22
42.3
12.1
125
54.5
503
Ac115
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3390
0.2282
0.6619
1.9366
3.31
6.89
4.2
14.2
16
0.89
156
2.78
8.6
0.674
4.76
0.645
4.2
1.36
6.99
1.08
6.59
1.14
7.17
37.3
10.4
98.3
48.9
457
Ac35
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.2921
0.2219
0.5703
1.8834
0.39
7.28
5.26
16.3
12
0.8
2.9
3
5.5
0.732
5.12
0.748
4.34
1.42
7.02
1.15
6.43
0.248
8.04
41.9
12.6
112
59.2
67
Ac37
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.4008
0.3333
0.7825
2.8291
5.22
8.41
3.54
11.7
15
0.39
58.3
2.77
11.7
0.721
4.83
0.69
4.64
1.5
8.11
1.36
7.79
2.22
8.98
42.3
11.9
110
51.1
632
Ac51
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.2767
0.1627
0.5403
1.3806
4.07
5.17
3.85
13.4
16
0.57
38.7
2.08
6.1
0.437
3.16
0.452
2.88
0.92
5.05
0.81
4.68
0.761
5.61
32.8
9.86
62.1
50.9
611
Ac56
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3344
0.1691
0.6529
1.4350
0.82
7.99
4.84
17.7
17
1.2
122
3.16
5.5
0.735
5.21
0.7
4.82
1.55
7.77
1.26
7.45
0.327
8.49
44.7
13.2
112
63.8
134
Ac72
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.3110
0.2377
0.6072
2.0176
0.13
8.60
5.55
17
15
0.88
2.7
3.37
7.6
0.856
6.04
0.895
5.23
1.7
8.57
1.35
7.34
0.186
9.69
51.5
14.8
124
67
22
Ac82
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.2959
0.2269
0.5777
1.9257
2.08
13.80
5.21
14.8
12
0.68
196
3.01
10.3
1.35
8.75
1.27
8.49
2.81
14.3
2.29
13.7
0.855
13.9
70.2
19
119
89.9
302
Ac89
Lpc
1.9524
8.4881
0.2884
0.2094
0.5631
1.7778
1.40
8.59
4.99
15.3
13
0.51
5.4
2.81
5.1
0.852
5.63
0.849
5.06
1.63
8.03
1.35
7.52
0.608
9.54
49.2
14
101
61.8
212
Ac92
Epc
1.9524
8.4881
0.2157
0.1892
0.4212
1.6063
0.63
5.61
6.41
12.7
10
0.22
489
2.7
4.7
0.674
4.39
0.61
3.91
1.26
6.04
0.92
5.3
0.238
5.91
29.5
8.69
83.7
42.6
85
Ac112
63 Page 10 of 24
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Page 11 of 24 63
Fig. 5 Trace elements, including rare earth elements (REE), normalized to the chondrite (right) and the primitive mantle (left; Sun and
McDonough 1989). Symbols as in Fig. 4. The relative enrichment of
LILE (large-ion lithophile elements) when compared to the HFSE
(high-field-strength elements) and the Nb–Ta–Pb anomalies reveal
the calc-alkaline nature of the felsic ACC. The xenolith sample corresponds to a sample reported by Sosa-Ceballos et al. (2018). Tc compositions were obtained from Pérez-Orozco et al. (2021)
volcanic systems to have occurred during or after the depositional process.
deposits represent explosive, volcanic eruptions. One
hypothesis that simplifies the origin of high crystallinity
is that the PEI formed as part of an intrusive body that was
exhumed and exposed by erosion. We think this hypothesis is unlikely because the deposits are welded at the bottom, but not the top, the deposit has a tabular shape, and
there is a systematic thinning of the deposits that fill the
valleys toward the east (Fig. 1b). Field evidence suggests
these rocks are ignimbrites that erupted from the eastern
border of the caldera, where the deposits are thicker and
thin toward the northeast (López-Hernández et al. 2009;
Origin of the deposits
The PEI deposits were originally described as ignimbrites (López-Hernández et al. 2009; Avellán et al. 2019,
2020). Nonetheless, its high crystallinity (almost totally
formed by crystals) and absence of pumice, ash, and low
lithic contents have not been described in the literature.
Given its high crystal content, we first investigate if these
13
63 Page 12 of 24
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Fig. 6 a Zr + Nb + Y + Ce vs SiO2 diagram of the ACC rhyolites, a
dotted line separates A- from I-type rhyolites based on Whalen et al.
(1987). b Rb/Ba vs Rb diagram displays the relation between crys-
tallization vs partial melting of the ACC. c #Mg vs S
iO2 of the PEI
rhyolites shows the low #Mg contents of the most of samples. d La/
Sm vs La diagram, e Eu/Eu* vs S
iO2 diagram. Symbols as in Fig. 4
Avellán et al. 2019). Due to hydrothermal alteration and
the massive structure of the deposits (Fig. 2a, b, c), it
is hard to tell if PEI was formed by the aggradation of
one eruption or by multi-PDC. However, Avellán et al.
(2019, 2020) describe several flow units that suggest a
multi-PDC origin for the PEI. The PEI deposits are highly
crystalline: the top of the deposit contains more than 70%
phenocrysts with sizes ≥ 2 mm, whereas the middle and
bottom portions contain up to 40–60% of phenocrysts
(Fig. 3a). Moreover, the phenocrysts are embedded in a
groundmass formed exclusively by microcrysts of polymorphs of silica and K-feldspar, devoid of glass. The
presence of K-feldspar megacrysts suggests that the PEI
magmas crystallized near its rheologic lock-up threshold,
as K-feldspar phenocrystals do not precipitate significantly while they are mobile (e.g., Glazner and Johnson
(2013). Arzilli et al. (2020) suggest that changes in crystal
fraction of alkali feldspar can range from hours to several
13
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Page 13 of 24 63
Fig. 7 Matrix composition shown as a X-ray maps of the matrix and
feldspar. Semiquantitative X-ray maps show the homogeneous composition of the anorthoclase phenocryst and the composition of the
matrix that is formed entirely of quartz polymorphs and k-feldspars.
The lateral scale shows the relative concentrations of Si, K, and Na in
relative intensities [arbitrary units]. b Total alkali vs silica diagram of
the matrix made with quantitative EPMA analysis to have a compositional reference
days as a function of undercooling and H 2O content in
the melt generating the alkali feldspar nucleation delay
and growth. Therefore, we suggest that the low changes
in Or content in the PEI phenocrysts of anorthoclases
suggest large periods of storage and growth under same
P–T conditions. Thus, the size and abundance of crystals
(some of them with exsolution textures) and the absence
of pumice strongly suggest that the PEI deposits represent
a crystal mush (crystals + melt) mobilized to the surface.
13
63 Page 14 of 24
Fig. 8 a and b Micrographs
of ferropseudobrookite and
ulvospinel crystal whit a–a´ and
b–b´ transects. c and d FeOtotal
(blue line and rectangles) and
TiO2 (green line and rectangles) concentrations vs distance
(µm). e and f Oxides in rutile–
wustite–hematite classification
diagrams. Ferropseudobrookite
has a relatively consistent
composition across the transect
a—a’. Disequilibrium in a and
b is evidenced by the rounded
form and bay rims of the crystals. The compositional changes
in ulvospinel tend to be more
extreme than those observed in
ferropseudobrookite. g and h
Oxide exsolution
13
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Fig. 9 Feldspar compositional transect, a secondary electron image of
an anorthoclase crystal, b compositional transect (A–A’) of anorthoclase. Note the slight compositional variation from center to rim
Page 15 of 24 63
where the center tends to be more potassic. c) Felspar classification
diagram showing low felspar compositional variations
Fig. 10 Representative X-ray
diffraction patterns of volcanic
ash samples (black) with Rietveld refinement fits (grey) and
background fits (red-dashed)
averaged across three sample
replicates. Peak positions of
reference mineral phases are
displayed above with the most
dominant peaks outlined in
black (Harlow 1982; Levien
et al. 1980; Downs and Palmer
1994; Hirose et al. 2005; Lee
and Xu 2019)
13
63 Page 16 of 24
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Table 2 Mineral phases determined by XRD on PEI samples
Sample
Phase
Phase %
s.d
Wt %
s.d
ACC100
Anorthoclase
Quartz
Cristobalite
Tridymite–Monoclinic
Tridymite–Orthorhombic
Total
Anorthoclase
Quartz
Cristobalite
Tridymite–Monoclinic
Total
Anorthoclase
Quartz
Cristobalite
Tridymite–Monoclinic
Total
Anorthoclase
Quartz
Cristobalite
Tridymite–Monoclinic
Total
51.6
16.2
9.6
6.2
16.4
100
51.1
34.2
13.8
0.9
100
42.2
52
4.3
1.5
100
76
18.4
4
1.6
100
0.8
3.4
2.6
0.5
1.6
63.1
4.9
2.6
20.3
9
100
78.4
13
4.7
3.8
100
70.3
21.5
1.6
6.6
100
88.5
5.3
1.1
5.1
100
1
0.6
0.4
0.9
0.6
PE1902
PE1904
PE1908
7.5
5.5
0.2
0.3
1.6
2.9
5.7
0.5
1.1
3.4
4.5
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.4
1
0.9
0.8
1.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
Storage before eruption
Recent geological, geophysical, and petrological studies proposed a series of magma storage zones below the
ACC (Sosa-Ceballos et al. 2018; Avellán et al. 2020; PérezOrozco et al. 2021). These storage zones match well with
the depths proposed by Townsend and Huber (2020) for
magma reservoirs (150–250 MPa, approximately 6–10 km)
and transitory-shallow magma accumulations (< 150 MPa),
although they are slightly shallower than those proposed by
Gualda and Ghiorso (2013) for rhyolites with the observed
silica content. Petrologic evidence including exsolution
textures and phenocryst sizes (assuming that phenocryst
growth occurs at depth) found in the PEI deposits support
a long, protracted interval of crystallization in a plutonic
body. Furthermore, ambient noise seismic tomography of
the anisotropic shear wave velocities reveals mafic intrusion below the E caldera border and NW outer zone (Perton et al. 2022). Geothermal exportation wells in Acoculco
reach 1900 m below the surface and intersected an intrusive
body at ~ 1600 m (Yáñez-García 1980; López-Hernández
et al. 2009). Aeromagnetic studies found a series of magmatic intrusive bodies hosted by calcareous rocks at depths
of 1000–2500 m below the ACC (López-Hernández et al.
2009; Avellán et al. 2020). Given their location, depth, and
magnetic susceptibility, these intrusions were considered to
be mafic.
13
We suggest a series of mafic magmas intruded the local
basement, creating skarns and marbles, and underplated vast
zones of the ACC surrounding areas; evidence for this is
the magnetic anomaly interpreted for the NE border of the
ACC (Fig. 13), below the PEI deposits, and the occurrence
of monogenetic-mafic volcanism along the SE–NE vicinity
of the ACC.
We propose that these mafic magmas underplated the
crystal-rich mush at depths of 100–250 MPa, progressively
contributing to its partial melting (e.g., Sas et al. 2021;
Eichelberger 2020). This eventually mobilized the mush
sufficiently for the magma to erupt. Feldspar crystals in
the PEI deposits contain rounded borders (Fig. 3) but are
characterized by almost constant core–rim compositions
(Figs. 7, 9). We propose that rim disequilibrium is produced
by temperature changes during the ultimate processes that
led to the eruption. Constant core–rim compositions could
be produced by crystallization over a narrow range in P–T
(e.g., such as might happen near the eutectic which is where
we would expect to get such a high vol. fraction of crystals
at constant composition), which drive melt-crystal evolution,
buffered by volatile flux (e.g., Blundy et al. 2006). This process would maintain essentially constant crystal composition. Volatiles could be fluxed by magmas underplating the
intrusive bodies (e.g., Huber et al. 2010; Sas et al. 2021).
The interaction of the mush with new mafic pulses and its
volatiles (Fig. 12), such as that occurs across other caldera
systems (i.e., Sohn et al. 2009; Watts et al. 2016; Repstock
et al. 2018), could initiate mush mobilization prior to eruption; Pérez-Orozco et al. (2021) and Peiffer et al. (2014)
reported anomalous high fluxing of CO2 within the caldera
perhaps as the result of mafic magmas degassing at depth.
Thus, the mass transfer of volatiles from the new intrusion
brings heat to the system. In consequence, this process can
enhance “defrosting” and possibly could generate the subsequent remobilization of the mush to the surface (Huber
et al. 2010).
Mobilization to the surface
Despite the processes of extraction and pre-eruptive storage
are often treated in tandem (Bachmann and Bergantz 2004a,
2008b), it is important to separate the two processes (Gualda
et al. 2019). We discuss the mobilization of PEI as a crystalrich magma in the context of ACC and its potential transportation to the surface. The transport of crystal-rich magma
from the upper crust to the surface represents a rheological
and structural problem as the high magma viscosity and
yield strength hinders easy transport. To address this issue,
we suggest that the PEI mush had a critical melt fraction
prior to eruption and, most importantly, it was in an eruptible state. The melt fraction promoted a continuum transition from a partially molten solid to a mushy liquid at about
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Page 17 of 24 63
Fig. 11 a Raman spectra of micro-crystals surrounding phenocrysts
from different stratigraphic positions, as well as, a characteristic feldspar spectrum (Fritz et al. 2005). b FTIR spectra of tridymite and
anorthoclase crystals from the bottom of the PEI. Note that the OH–
H2O bands (3000–3800 cm−1) show no structural dislocation/defects
of water or hydroxyl. This could suggest the diffusion of OH–H2O
due to hydrothermal alteration
50–55 vol% crystals (e.g., (Marsh 2000). Furthermore, the
bulk viscosity could change orders of magnitude between 40
and 60% crystallization (Lejeune and Richet 1995). Above
the critical crystallinity of ~ 50 vol%, the crystals form
a strong interlocking network that restricts flow, whereas
viscosity and yield strength drop rapidly as crystallinity
declines (Marsh 2000). Moreover, the transient state from
Newtonian to non-Newtonian conduct occurs between 30
and 50% of crystals (Petford 2003), and the drop in the viscosity could be promoted by the recharge of hotter mafic
magmas. For that reason, these critical rheological shifts
arise close to the critical crystallinity for the very large
volume of rhyolites described here. The lower viscosities
produced through the hot magma recharges allows felsic
magmas reach the surface in form of dikes, with width less
than 20 m (Petford et al. 1994). These dikes are probably
located both inside and outside the caldera (Fig. 1), following post-collapse faults generated during the lithospheric
extensional episodes in the region (García-Palomo et al.
2002, 2018) let the magmas to infill the faults through
the dike propagation (Petford et al. 1994; Weinberg 1996;
Karlstrom et al. 2012; Cruden and Weinberg 2018). Dike
propagation can experience a rheological transition when the
eruption starts (Karlstrom et al. 2012) In the case of the PEI,
we propose that extension could generate structural conditions that facilitate mafic recharge. Recharge events would
13
63 Page 18 of 24
in turn decrease the PEI viscosity and yield strength, at least
temporarily, and enhance the likelihood of eruption. Consequently, the PEI eruption occurred in the eastern part of the
13
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
ACC, where the displacement or reactivation of a regional
fault, likely the ancient caldera rim, led to the eruption. This
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Page 19 of 24 63
◂Fig. 12 a) Magnetic field reduced to the pole (MFRP) map of the
ACC region modified from Avellan et al. (2020); EAC1 and EAC2
represent the CFE boreholes. We propose that the anomalies characterized by -25 to 25 [nT] (center and NE of the caldera) represent mafic intrusions that contributed to form the crystal mush and
expulsed it to the surface; the mafic magmas not only stalled at depth,
but they also formed the monogenetic volcanos on the eastern side
of the caldera. b Simplified cross-section profile (A–A’) showing
the location of shallow intrusions and leftovers interpreted from the
MFRP map. Given the crystal-rich nature of the PEI, we suggest that
the crystal mush was very shallow and previously deformed by normal faults that facilitated the extraction to the surface
fault is associated with negative magnetic anomalies and
lineaments as described by Avellán et al. (2020).
Geochemistry of the rhyolites and their relationship
with the crystal mush
The relationship between crystal mushes, melts that generate crystal-rich ignimbrites, and their impact on subsequent
effusive volcanism has not been studied in detail. Because
of the compositional diversity of its felsic eruptive products, the ACC (Fig. 1a) is an ideal location for studying
how highly silicic, viscous magmas impact upper crustal
evolution (Fig. 4). Rhyolite lavas are the most common rock
in the ACC (Fig. 1b). Overall, these rocks can be classified
into two groups: 1) I-type, classic hydrous calc-alkaline arc
rocks, and 2) A-type ‘dry’ rocks (Fig. 6a) that have classical
subduction-related trace element anomalies such as negative
anomalies of Nb and Ta, also positive Pb anomalies (Fig. 5).
This classification cannot determine if a rhyolite was formed
by a mush. Hence, we classified the rhyolitic lavas into two
groups as a function of their trace elements: the first group
(G1) shows variable Eu/Eu*, low Ba contents, and variable
#Mg, and the second group (G2) shows low Eu/Eu*, variable
Ba contents, and low #Mg (Fig. 6). In addition, G1 lavas
have variable concentrations of Sr, P, Zr, and REE, whereas
G2 lavas are less variable, although the negative anomalies
shown in Ba, P, Sr, and Ti are more pronounced (Fig. 5).
G1 trace elements can be explained by events of fractional
crystallization of plagioclase and ferromagnesian minerals.
Whereas trace elements in G2 rocks are relatively constant
and mimic the patterns and anomalies found in the PEI rocks
(anomalies in Ba, Sr, P and Ti are characteristic in peralkaline
rhyolites). However, we cannot neglect that some fractional
crystallization occurred to form G2 rocks. Thus, rocks related
to crystal mush extracts probably show features of partial melting caused by the distributed dissolution of crystals. Crystal
dissolution is a process described in crystal mush systems
(Bachmann et al. 2002; Deering et al. 2011; Pamukcu et al.
2013; Sliwinski et al. 2017; Szymanowski et al. 2017; Foley
et al. 2020; Lubbers et al. 2020; Tavazzani et al. 2020) promoted, in general, by the injection of hot mafic magma that can
lead to minimal chemical interaction and unevenly distributed
Fig. 13 Geochemical models consider diverse degrees of partial melting (0.5–40% of partial melting) of a granitic xenolith (orange lines),
lower (red line), middle (light red), and upper crust (pink line) showing the behavior of ACC rhyolitic samples in a La/Eu vs Rb, b La/Zr,
c REE concentrations
thermal flux (Foley et al. 2020). Consequently, the rocks produced by the partial melting of crystal mush will inherit certain
geochemical patterns sensitive to modeling.
13
63 Page 20 of 24
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Fig. 14 Schematic model of rhyolite petrogenesis at the ACC. The
generation of multiple melt compositions at the ACC is driven by
fractional crystallization of subduction-related intermediate magmas
and the mush extracts from A-type peralkaline intrusive bodies. The
PEI represent mush (melt + crystals) mobilized to the surface, other
ACC rhyolites seem to be pure melts extracted from the crystal mush
and other I-type magmas. The underplating of mafic magmas drives
some parts of the hot plutonic body to a crystal mush state. The thermal and volatile input also reduces density and viscosity through partial melting of mushed parts of the pluton increasing its buoyancy
As observed in G1 and G2, some rocks fit the partial melt
models; G2 rocks fit better the model performed with the xenolith as end member, > 40% of partial melting (Fig. 13), whereas
G1, as seen in the model using PEI as end member, could represent relatively high degrees of PEI partial melting (Fig. 13).
Although G1 and G2 overall fit the models, we cannot exclude
the possibility that multiple crystal mushes serve as magma
sources; idealizing such models suffer well-recognized limitations: lack of samples, uncertainty about the composition
abundance of comprising phases and subsurface alteration.
Hence, given the differences shown by G1 and G2 rocks, our
best approximation is to suggest that rhyolites in the ACC were
produced by at least two different sources, one of which could
be related to the partial melting of the rocks remobilized to be
deposited as the PEI.
in this part of the TMVB. Thus, mafic magmas that erupted
through monogenetic vents around the ACC, but these features
are equally or even more common in western TMVB, served
as the heating element melting the intrusive body, forming the
crystal mush and the G2 rhyolites. Melting and extracting the
crystal mush dispersed the pyroclastic density currents that
emplaced the PEI deposits at the surface.
Rhyolite formation model
We propose a model for rhyolite formation in the ACC
(Fig. 14). Primary melts are formed in a subduction zone for
the TMVB (e.g., Gómez-Tuena et al. (2018); Parolari et al.
(2021). The G1 rhyolites were formed by fractional crystallization of intermediate magmas, probably of tholeiitictransitional compositions that arrived at the upper crust and
assimilated some country rock (e.g., Sosa-Ceballos et al.
2021). Given the distance from the trench ~ 450 km, the crustal thickness ~ 40 km, and the depth of the slab below the
ACC ~ 300 km (Pérez-Campos et al. 2008; Ferrari et al. 2012;
Castellanos et al. 2018), some melts formed A-type peralkaline
intrusive bodies in a back-arc type environment (e.g., Karsli
et al. 2012; Jiang et al. 2006). Perhaps, the influence of the
mantle flow in this region, produced by the rollback and slab
tear of the Cocos plate (Castellanos et al. 2018), generated
the tectonic extension that promoted the ascent of the melts
13
Conclusion
The ultra-crystalline rhyolitic PEI was erupted ~ 1.2 Ma
ago through the eastern portion of the ACC. The PEI is
composed primarily of compositionally homogeneous
K-felspar and quartz polymorphs. The high crystallinity
(close to ~ 100%) in the PEI is the result of two independent
main processes: magmatic crystallization and hydrothermal
recrystallization of the matrix. Protracted crystallization at
shallow depths produced up to the 50% of crystals and postdepositional hydrothermal alteration causes devitrification
of the remaining matrix to produce cristobalite + tridymite
crystals. The presence of this ultra-crystal-rich rhyolitic ignimbrites in ACC suggests that some felsic eruptions are the
product of the remobilization of a crystalline mush. Injection or recharge of hot magma resulted in the transport of
the mush and its extracts from the crust to the surface. We
suggest that the mafic magmas that erupted through monogenetic vents around the ACC served as the heating element that promoted the partial melting and mobilization of
underplate intrusive bodies. Thus, the geochemical diversity of the ACC rhyolites reflects a complex combination
of different magmatic processes. The ACC rhyolites can be
divided into G1 (“I-type”) calkaline and G2 (“A-type”) peralkaline. We suggest that most of the G1 and G2 rhyolites
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
could represent relatively high degrees of partial melting
and were produced by at least two different sources, one of
which could be related to melt extracts of the crystal mush
in which PEI magma were formed.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 007/s 00410-0 23-0 2043-7.
Acknowledgements Funding for this research was provided to JLM by
Project#15 of CEMIE-Geo and WP4.4 of GEMEX. We thank Gabriela
Reyes Agustín for sample preparation and his assistance with DRX,
FTIR, and Raman analysis; Felipe García Tenorio for field mapping,
sampling, thin section, and crystal preparation; Fabiola Mendiola for
XRD sample preparation; Dario Torres for their support and guidance in the geochemical model; John Stix, Lydia Harmon, Gordon M.
Moore, and unrevealed revisors for their comments that improve the
manuscript.
Data availability All the data was setted in the manuscript and supplementary information.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long
as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes
were made. The images or other third party material in this article are
included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in
the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a
copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
References
Anderson AT, Davis AM, Lu F (2000) Evolution of Bishop Tuff
Rhyolitic Magma Based on Melt and Magnetite Inclusions and
Zoned Phenocrysts. J Petrol 41:449–473. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 093/
PETROLOGY/41.3.449
Antao SM, Hassan I, Wang J et al (2008) State-of-the-art high-resolution powder x-ray diffraction (HRPXRD) illustrated with
Rietveld structure refinement of quartz, sodalite, tremolite, and
meionite. Can Mineral 46:1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.3749/
CANMIN.46.5.1501
Arzilli F, Stabile P, Fabbrizio A et al (2020) Crystallization Kinetics
of Alkali Feldspar in Peralkaline Rhyolitic Melts: Implications
for Pantelleria Volcano. Front Earth Sci (lausanne). https://doi.
org/10.3389/FEART.2020.00177/BIBTEX
Avellán DR, Macías JL, Layer PW et al (2019) Geology of the late
Pliocene-Pleistocene Acoculco caldera complex, eastern TransMexican Volcanic Belt (México). J Maps 15:8–18
Avellán DR, Macías JL, Layer PW et al (2020) Eruptive chronology of
the Acoculco caldera complex: A resurgent caldera in the eastern
Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (México). J South Am Earth Sci.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAMES.2019.102412
Bachmann O, Bergantz GW (2003) Rejuvenation of the Fish Canyon
magma body: A window into the evolution of large-volume
silicic magma systems. Geology 31:789–792. https://doi.org/
10.1130/G19764.1
Page 21 of 24 63
Bachmann O, Bergantz GW (2004a) On the origin of crystal-poor
rhyolites: extracted from batholithic crystal mushes. J Petrol
45:1565–1582
Bachmann O, Bergantz G (2008a) The Magma Reservoirs That Feed
Supereruptions. Elements 4:17–21. https://doi.org/10.2113/
GSELEMENTS.4.1.17
Bachmann O, Bergantz GW (2008b) Rhyolites and their Source
Mushes across Tectonic Settings. J Petrol 49:2277–2285.
https://doi.org/10.1093/PETROLOGY/EGN068
Bachmann O, Dungan MA, Lipman PW (2002) The Fish Canyon
Magma Body, San Juan Volcanic Field, Colorado: Rejuvenation and Eruption of an Upper-Crustal Batholith. J Petrol
43:1469–1503. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 093/P ETROLOGY/4 3.8.
1469
Bindeman I (2008) Oxygen Isotopes in Mantle and Crustal Magmas
as Revealed by Single Crystal Analysis. Rev Mineral Geochem
69:445–478. https://doi.org/10.2138/RMG.2008.69.12
Bindeman IN, Valley JW (2003) Rapid generation of both high- and
low-δ18O, large-volume silicic magmas at the Timber Mountain/Oasis Valley caldera complex, Nevada. GSA Bull 115:581–
595. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2003)115%3c0581:
RGOBHA%3e2.0.CO;2
Blundy J, Cashman K (2008) Petrologic Reconstruction of Magmatic
System Variables and Processes. Rev Mineral Geochem 69:179–
239. https://doi.org/10.2138/RMG.2008.69.6
Blundy J, Cashman K, Humphreys M (2006) Magma heating by
decompression-driven crystallization beneath andesite volcanoes. Nature 443:76–80
Brophy JG (1991) Composition gaps, critical crystallinity, and fractional crystallization in orogenic (calc-alkaline) magmatic systems. Contrib Miner Petrol 109:173–182. https://doi.org/10.
1007/BF00306477/METRICS
Browne PRL (1978) Hydrothermal alteration in active geothermal
fields. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 6:229–248
Calcagno P, Trumpy E, Gutiérrez-Negrín LC, Norini G, Macías JA,
Carrasco-Núñez G, Liotta D, Garduño-Monroy VH, Hersir GP,
Vaessen L, Evanno G (2019) Updating the 3D Geomodels of Los
Humeros and Acoculco Geothermal Systems (Mexico)-H2020
GEMex Project
Canet C, Hernández-Cruz B, Jiménez-Franco A et al (2015) Combining
ammonium mapping and short-wave infrared (SWIR) reflectance
spectroscopy to constrain a model of hydrothermal alteration for
the Acoculco geothermal zone, Eastern Mexico. Geothermics
53:154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOTHERMICS.2014.
05.012
Capaccioni B, Coniglio S (1995) Varicolored and vesiculated tuffs from
La Fossa volcano, Vulcano Island (Aeolian Archipelago, Italy):
evidence of syndepositional alteration processes. Bull Volcanol
57:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298708/METRICS
Cashman KV, Giordano G (2014) Calderas and magma reservoirs.
J Volcanol Geoth Res 288:28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
JVOLGEORES.2014.09.007
Cashman KV, Sparks RSJ, Blundy JD (2017) Vertically extensive and
unstable magmatic systems: A unified view of igneous processes.
Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAG3055
Castellanos JC, Clayton RW, Pérez-Campos X (2018) Imaging the
Eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt With Ambient Seismic
Noise: Evidence for a Slab Tear. J Geophys Res Solid Earth
123:7741–7759. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB015783
Clemens JD, Bryan SE, Mayne MJ et al (2022) How are silicic volcanic
and plutonic systems related? Part 1: A review of geological
and geophysical observations, and insights from igneous rock
chemistry. Earth Sci Rev. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 016/J.E
ARSCI REV.
2022.104249
13
63 Page 22 of 24
Crovisier JL, Honnorez J, Fritz B, Petit JC (1992) Dissolution of subglacial volcanic glasses from Iceland: laboratory study and modelling. Appl Geochem 7:55–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-
2927(09)80064-4
Cruden AR, Weinberg RF (2018) Mechanisms of Magma Transport
and Storage in the Lower and Middle Crust—Magma Segregation, Ascent and Emplacement. In: Steffi Burchardt (ed) Volcanic
and igneous plumbing systems 13–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/
B978-0-12-809749-6.00002-9
Deer WA, Howie RA, Wise WS, Zussman J (2004) Framework silicates : silica minerals, feldspathoids and the zeolites. In: Rockforming minerals, vol 4B, 2nd edn. The Geological Society,
London, pp 493–523
Deering CD, Bachmann O, Vogel TA (2011) The Ammonia Tanks
Tuff: Erupting a melt-rich rhyolite cap and its remobilized crystal
cumulate. Earth Planet Sci Lett 310:518–525. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.EPSL.2011.08.032
Downs RT, Palmer DC (1994) The pressure behavior of c cristobalite.
American Mineralogisl 79:9–14
Eichelberger J (2020) Distribution and Transport of Thermal
Energy within Magma–Hydrothermal Systems. Geosciences
212(10):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/GEOSCIENCES10060212
Engvik AKP, Gerald AF, John D, Austrheim H (2008) Albitization
of granitic rocks: the mechanism of replacement of oligoclase
by albite. Can Mineral 46:1401–1415. https://doi.org/10.3749/
canmin.46.6.1401
Ferrari L, Orozco-Esquivel T, Manea V, Manea M (2012) The dynamic
history of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt and the Mexico subduction zone. Tectonophysics 522:122–149
Foley ML, Miller CF, Gualda GAR (2020) Architecture of a Supersized Magma Chamber and Remobilization of its Basal Cumulate (Peach Spring Tuff, USA) P E T R O L O G Y. J Petrol
61:20. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egaa020
Fritz J, Greshake A, Stöffler D (2005) Micro-Raman spectroscopy
of plagioclase and maskelynite in Martian meteorites: Evidence
of progressive shock metamorphism. Antarct Meteor Res 18:96
Furnes H (1978) Element mobility during palagonitization of a
subglacial hyaloclastite in Iceland. Chem Geol 22:249–264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(78)90034-7
García-Palomo A, Macías JL, Tolson G et al (2002) Volcanic stratigraphy and geological evolution of the Apan region, eastcentral sector of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Geofísica
Internacional 41:133–150
García-Palomo A, Macías JL, Jiménez A et al (2018) NW-SE Pliocene-Quaternary extension in the Apan-Acoculco region,
eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. J Volcanol Geoth Res
349:240–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOLGEORES.2017.
11.005
Giggenbach WF (1984) Mass transfer in hydrothermal alteration
systems—A conceptual approach. Geochim Cosmochim Acta
48:2693–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(84)90317-X
Giordano G, Caricchi L (2022) Determining the state of activity of
transcrustal magmatic systems and their volcanoes. Ann Rev
Earth Planet Sci 50:231-259. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUR
EV-EARTH-032320-084733
Glazner AF, Johnson BR (2013) Late crystallization of K-feldspar
and the paradox of megacrystic granites. Contrib Miner Petrol 166:777–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00410-013-0914-1/
FIGURES/16
Gómez-Alvarez F, Garduño-Monroy VH, Sosa-Ceballos G et al (2021)
New constraints on tectonism and magmatism from the eastern sector of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (Chignahuapan
Horst. J South Am Earth Sci, Puebla, México). https://doi.org/
10.1016/J.JSAMES.2021.103468
Gómez-Tuena A, Mori L, Straub SM (2018) Geochemical and petrological insights into the tectonic origin of the Transmexican
13
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Volcanic Belt. Earth Sci Rev 183:153–181. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.EARSCIREV.2016.12.006
Gottsmann J, Lavallée Y, Martí J, Aguirre-Díaz G (2009) Magma–
tectonic interaction and the eruption of silicic batholiths. Earth
Planet Sci Lett 284:426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSL.
2009.05.008
Gualda GAR, Ghiorso MS (2013) Geological note low-pressure origin of high-silica rhyolites and granites. J Geol 121:537–545.
https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 086/6 71395/A
SSET/I MAGES/L
ARGE/F
G4_
ONLINE.JPEG
Gualda GAR, Gravley DM, Deering CD, Ghiorso MS (2019) Magma
extraction pressures and the architecture of volcanic plumbing
systems. Earth Planet Sci Lett 522:118–124. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.EPSL.2019.06.020
Harlow GE (1982) The anorthoclase structures: the effects of temperature and composition. Am Miner 67:975–996
Hay RL, Iijima A (1968) Nature and Origin of Palagonite Tuffs of the
Honolulu Group on Oahu. Haw Mem Geol Soc Am 116:331–
376. https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM116-P331
Heaney PJ, Veblen DR, Post JE (1994) Structural disparities between
chalcedony and macrocrystalline quartz. Am Miner 79:452–460
Hildreth W (1981) Gradients in silicic magma chambers: Implications for lithospheric magmatism. J Geophys Res Solid Earth
86:10153–10192. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB086IB11P10153
Hildreth W, Wilson CJN (2007) Compositional Zoning of the Bishop
Tuff. J Petrol 48:951–999. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 093/P ETRO
LOGY/EGM007
Hirose T, Kihara K, Okuno M et al (2005) X-ray, DTA and Raman
studies of monoclinic tridymite and its higher temperature
orthorhombic modification with varying temperature. J Mineral
Petrol Sci 100:55
Huber C, Bachmann O, Manga M (2010) Two Competing Effects of
Volatiles on Heat Transfer in Crystal-rich Magmas: Thermal
Insulation vs Defrosting. J Petrol 51:847–867. https://doi.org/
10.1093/PETROLOGY/EGQ003
Ibrahim K, Hall A (1996) The authigenic zeolites of the Aritayn Volcaniclastic Formation, north-east Jordan. Miner Depos 31:514–
522. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196131/METRICS
Jiang YH, Jiang SY, Zhao KD, Ling HF (2006) Petrogenesis of Late
Jurassic Qianlishan granites and mafic dykes, Southeast China:
implications for a back-arc extension setting. Geol Mag 143:457–
474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756805001652
Jolles JSR, Lange RA (2021) Origin of Compositional Gradients with
Temperature in the High-SiO2 Rhyolite Portion of the Bishop
Tuff: Constraints on Mineral–Melt–Fluid Reactions in the Parental Mush. J Petrol 62:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/PETRO
LOGY/EGAB087
Karlstrom L, Rudolph ML, Manga M (2012) Caldera size modulated
by the yield stress within a crystal-rich magma reservoir. Nat
Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1453
Karsli O, Caran Ş, Dokuz A et al (2012) A-type granitoids from the
Eastern Pontides, NE Turkey: Records for generation of hybrid
A-type rocks in a subduction-related environment. Tectonophysics 530–531:208–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECTO.2011.
12.030
Kihara K, Matsumoto T, Imamura M (1986) Structural change of
orthorhombic-I tridymite with temperature: A study based on
second-order thermal-vibrational parameters. Z Kristallogr Cryst
Mater 177:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1524/ZKRI.1986.177.14.27
Kimball KL (1990) Effects of hydrothermal alteration on the compositions of chromian spinels. Contrib Miner Petrol 105:337–346.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00306543/METRICS
Kousehlar M, Weisenberger TB, Tutti F, Mirnejad H (2012) Fluid control on low-temperature mineral formation in volcanic rocks of
Kahrizak. Iran Geofluids 12:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/
GFL.12001
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
Lee S, Xu H (2019) Using powder XRD and pair distribution function to determine anisotropic atomic displacement parameters of
orthorhombic tridymite and tetragonal cristobalite. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater 75:160–167. https://doi.org/
10.1107/S2052520619000933/DK5075SUP4.PDF
Lejeune AM, Richet P (1995) Rheology of crystal-bearing silicate
melts: An experimental study at high viscosities. J Geophys Res
Solid Earth 100:4215–4229. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB02985
Levien L, Prewitt CT, Weidner DJ (1980) Structure and elastic properties of quartz at pressure. Am Mineral 65(9-10):920–930
López-Hernández A, García-Estrada G, Aguirre-Díaz G et al (2009)
Hydrothermal activity in the Tulancingo-Acoculco Caldera Complex, central Mexico: Exploratory studies. Geothermics 38:279–
293. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOTHERMICS.2009.05.001
Lopez-Hernandez A, Castillo-Hernandez D (1997) Exploratory drilling
at Acoculco, Puebla, Mexico: A hydrothermal system with only
nonthermal manifestations (Conference) | OSTI.GOV. https://
www.osti.gov/biblio/602731
Lubbers J, Deering C, Bachmann O (2020) Genesis of rhyolitic melts
in the upper crust: Fractionation and remobilization of an intermediate cumulate at Lake City caldera. J Volcanol Geother Res,
Colorado, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOLGEORES.2019.
106750
Macías JL, Sheridan MF, Espíndola JM (1997) Reappraisal of the 1982
eruptions of El Chichón Volcano, Chiapas, Mexico: New data
from proximal deposits. Bull Volcanol 58:459–471. https://doi.
org/10.1007/S004450050155/METRICS
Malfait WJ, Seifert R, Petitgirard S et al (2014) Supervolcano eruptions
driven by melt buoyancy in large silicic magma chambers. Nat
Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2042
Marsh BD (1981) On the crystallinity, probability of occurrence, and
rheology of lava and magma. Contrib Miner Petrol 78:85–98.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00371146/METRICS
Marsh BD (2000) Reservoirs of magma and magma chambers. In:
Sigurdsson H (ed) Encyclopedia of volcanoes. Academic, vol
1607. pp 191–206
Mathieu L (2018) Quantifying Hydrothermal Alteration: A Review
of Methods. Geosciences 245(8):245. https://doi.org/10.3390/
GEOSCIENCES8070245
Nadoll P, Mauk JL (2011) Wüstite in a hydrothermal silver-lead-zinc
vein, Lucky Friday mine, Coeur d’Alene mining district, U.S.A.
Am Miner 96:261–267. https://doi.org/10.2138/AM.2011.3553/
MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS
Pamukcu AS, Carley TL, Gualda GAR et al (2013) The Evolution of
the Peach Spring Giant Magma Body: Evidence from Accessory Mineral Textures and Compositions, Bulk Pumice and
Glass Geochemistry, and Rhyolite-MELTS Modeling. J Petrol
54:1109–1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/PETROLOGY/EGT007
Pandarinath K, García-Soto AY, Santoyo E et al (2020) Mineralogical
and geochemical changes due to hydrothermal alteration of the
volcanic rocks at Acoculco geothermal system, Mexico. Geol J
55:6508–6526. https://doi.org/10.1002/GJ.3817
Pardo M, Suarez G (1995) Shape of the subducted Rivera and Cocos
plates in southern Mexico: Seismic and tectonic implications. J
Geophys Res Solid Earth 100:12357–12373. https://doi.org/10.
1029/95JB00919
Parolari M, Gómez-Tuena A, Errázuriz-Henao C, Cavazos-Tovar JG
(2021) Orogenic andesites and their link to the continental rock
cycle. Lithos. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LITHOS.2020.105958
Pauly BD, Schiffman P, Zierenberg RA et al (2011) Environmental
and chemical controls on palagonitization. Geochem Geophys
Geosyst 12:12017. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003639
Peiffer L, Bernard-Romero R, Mazot A et al (2014) Fluid geochemistry and soil gas fluxes (CO2–CH4–H2S) at a promissory Hot
Dry Rock Geothermal System: The Acoculco caldera, Mexico.
Page 23 of 24 63
J Volcanol Geoth Res 284:122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
JVOLGEORES.2014.07.019
Pérez-Campos X, Kim YH, Husker A et al (2008) Horizontal subduction and truncation of the Cocos Plate beneath central Mexico.
Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035127
Pérez-Orozco JD, Sosa-Ceballos G, Macías JL (2021) Tectonic and
magmatic controls on the evolution of post-collapse volcanism.
Lithos, Insights from the Acoculco Caldera Complex, Puebla,
México. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LITHOS.2020.105878
Perton M, Maldonado Hernández LT, Figueroa-Soto A et al (2022)
The magmatic plumbing system of the Acoculco volcanic complex (Mexico) revealed by ambient noise tomography. J Volcanol
Geother Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOLGEORES.2022.
107704
Petford N, Lister JR, Kerr RC (1994) The ascent of felsic magmas
in dykes. Lithos 32:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-
4937(94)90028-0
Petford N (2003) Rheology of Granitic Magmas During Ascent and
Emplacement. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 31(1):399–427
Post JE, Bish DL (1989) Rietveld refinement of crystal structures using
powder X-ray diffraction data. Mod Powder Diffr 20:277–30
Repstock A, Breitkreuz C, Lapp M, Schulz B (2018) Voluminous
and crystal-rich igneous rocks of the Permian Wurzen volcanic
system, northern Saxony, Germany: physical volcanology and
geochemical characterization. Int J Earth Sci 107:1485–1513.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S00531-017-1554-X/FIGURES/14
Rollinson HR (2014) Using Geochemical Data: Evaluation. Using
Geochemical Data, Presentation, Interpretation. https://doi.org/
10.4324/9781315845548
Rowe MC, Ellis BS, Lindeberg A (2012) Quantifying crystallization
and devitrification of rhyolites by means of X-ray diffraction and
electron microprobe analysis. Am Miner 97:1685–1699. https://
doi.org/10.2138/AM.2012.4006
Sánchez-Córdova MM, Canet C, Rodríguez-Díaz A et al (2020) Waterrock interactions in the Acoculco geothermal system, eastern
Mexico: Insights from paragenesis and elemental mass-balance.
Geochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMER.2019.06.003
Sas M, Shane P, Kuritani T et al (2021) Mush, Melts and Metasediments: a History of Rhyolites from the Okataina Volcanic Centre, New Zealand, as Captured in Plagioclase. J Petrol 62:1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1093/PETROLOGY/EGAB038
Scaillet B, Holtz F, Pichavant M (2016) Experimental Constraints on
the Formation of Silicic Magmas. Elements 12:109–114. https://
doi.org/10.2113/GSELEMENTS.12.2.109
Schwartz GM (1959) Hydrothermal alteration. Econ Geol 54:161–183.
https://doi.org/10.2113/GSECONGEO.54.2.161
Seifert W, Thomas R, Rhede D et al (2010) Origin of coexisting
wüstite, Mg–Fe and REE phosphate minerals in graphite-bearing
fluorapatite from the Rumburk granite. Eur J Mineral 22:495–
507. https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2010/0022-2034
Sliwinski JT, Bachmann O, Dungan MA et al (2017) Rapid pre-eruptive thermal rejuvenation in a large silicic magma body: the case
of the Masonic Park Tuff, Southern Rocky Mountain volcanic
field, CO, USA. Contrib Miner Petrol 172:1–20. https://doi.org/
10.1007/S00410-017-1351-3/FIGURES/9
Sohn YK, Son M, Jeong JO, Jeon YM (2009) Eruption and emplacement of a laterally extensive, crystal-rich, and pumice-free ignimbrite (the Cretaceous Kusandong Tuff, Korea). Sediment Geol
220:190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEDGEO.2009.04.020
Sosa-Ceballos G, Macías JL, Avellán DR et al (2018) The Acoculco
Caldera Complex magmas: Genesis, evolution and relation with
the Acoculco geothermal system. J Volcanol Geoth Res 358:288–
306. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOLGEORES.2018.06.002
Sosa-Ceballos G, Boijseauneau-Lopez ME, Perez-Orozco JD et al
(2021) Silicic magmas in the Michoacan-Guanajuato volcanic
13
63 Page 24 of 24
field: An overview of plumbing systems, crustal storage, and
genetic processes. Rev Mex Cienc Geol 38:210–225
Stroncik NA, Schmincke HU (2001) Evolution of palagonite: Crystallization, chemical changes, and element budget. GeochemGeophy
Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GC000102
Sun SS, McDonough WF (1989) Chemical and isotopic systematics
of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol Soc Spec Publ 42:313–345. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 144/
GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19
Szymanowski D, Wotzlaw JF, Ellis BS et al (2017) Protracted nearsolidus storage and pre-eruptive rejuvenation of large magma
reservoirs. Nat Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3020
Tavazzani L, Peres S, Sinigoi S et al (2020) Timescales and Mechanisms of Crystal-mush Rejuvenation and Melt Extraction
Recorded in Permian Plutonic and Volcanic Rocks of the Sesia
Magmatic System (Southern Alps, Italy). J Petrol 61:49. https://
doi.org/10.1093/PETROLOGY/EGAA049
Toby BH, Von Dreele RB (2013) GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern
open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J
Appl Crystallogr 46(2):544–549. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021
889813003531
Townsend M, Huber C (2020) A critical magma chamber size for volcanic eruptions. Geology 48:431–435. https://doi.org/10.1130/
G47045.1
Troch J, Huber C, Bachmann O (2022) The physical and chemical
evolution of magmatic fluids in near-solidus silicic magma reservoirs: Implications for the formation of pegmatites. Am Miner
107:190–205. https://doi.org/10.2138/AM-2021-7915/ASSET/
GRAPHIC/J_AM-2021-7915_FIG_004.JPG
Vigneresse JL, Barbey P, Cuney M (1996) Rheological transitions during partial melting and crystallization with application to felsic
magma segregation and transfer. J Petrol 37:1579–1600. https://
doi.org/10.1093/PETROLOGY/37.6.1579
Walton AW, Schiffman P, Walton AW, Schiffman P (2003) Alteration
of hyaloclastites in the HSDP 2 Phase 1 Drill Core 1. Description
13
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 178:63
and paragenesis. Geochem Geophys Geosys. https://doi.org/10.
1029/2002GC000368
Watts KE, John DA, Colgan JP et al (2016) Probing the VolcanicPlutonic Connection and the Genesis of Crystal-rich Rhyolite
in a Deeply Dissected Supervolcano in the Nevada Great Basin:
Source of the Late Eocene Caetano Tuff. J Petrol 57:1599–1644.
https://doi.org/10.1093/PETROLOGY/EGW051
Weinberg RF (1996) Ascent mechanism of felsic magmas: news and
views. Earth Environ Sci Trans R Soc Edinb 87:95–103. https://
doi.org/10.1017/S0263593300006519
Whalen JB, Currie KL, Chappell BW (1987) A-type granites: geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis. Contrib Miner Petrol 95:407–419
Whitney JA, Naldrett AJ, Robertson JM (1989) Origin and Evolution
of Silicic Magmas. Ore Dep Ass Magmas. https://doi.org/10.
5382/REV.04.11.k,
Yáñez-García C (1980) Informe geológico del proyecto geotérmico
Los Humeros-Las Derrumbadas, estados de Puebla y Veracruz.
CFE-GPG Int Rep 01:80
Zhang JH, Yang JH, Chen JY et al (2018) Genesis of late Early Cretaceous high-silica rhyolites in eastern Zhejiang Province, southeast China: A crystal mush origin with mantle input. Lithos 296–
299:482–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LITHOS.2017.11.026
Zhou Z, Fyfe WS (1989) Palagonitiz tion of basaltic glass from DSDP
Site 335, Leg 37: Textures, chemical composition, and mechanism of formation. Am Miner 74:1045–1053
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.